New Page 1
SAN FRANCISCO
PLANNING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes
Commission Chambers - Room 400
City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B.
Goodlett Place
Thursday, July 7, 2011
12:00 PM
Regular Meeting
COMMISSIOONERS PRESENT: Olague,
Antonini, Borden, Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Moore
STAFF IN ATTENDANCE: John
Rahaim – Director of Planning, Kevin Guy, David Alumbaugh, Joy Navarrete, Sophie
Hayward, Thomas Wang, Kimberly Durandet, Ben Fu, Rich Sucre, Sara Vellve, Glenn
Cabreros, Aaron Starr, Jonas Ionin – Acting Commission Secretary
THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER
BY PRESIDENT OLAGUE AT: 12:10 PM
A.
CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS PROPOSED FOR CONTINUANCE
The
Commission will consider a request for continuance to a later date. The
Commission may choose to continue the item to the date proposed below, to
continue the item to another date, or to hear the item on this calendar.
1.
2011.0415C (E.
JACKSON: (415) 558-6363)
234 9TH STREET
- southwest side of 9th Street, between
Tehama and Clementina Streets, Lot 004 of Assessor’s Block 3518 - Request for
Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Planning Code Sections 227(h),
303, and 816.73 to install a wireless telecommunications facility consisting of
9 new panel antennas to be located on the roof of an existing three story
commercial building and 5 new equipment cabinets to be located within the
existing building in a first floor storage area. The project site is within a
SLR (Service / Light Industrial / Residential Mixed Use) Zoning District and a
50-X Height and Bulk District. The proposal is part of a wireless transmission
network operated by AT&T on a Location Preference 4 (Preferred Location –
Industrial or Commercial Structures) according to the Wireless
Telecommunications Services (WTS) Siting Guidelines.
Preliminary Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for Continuance to September 15, 2011)
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: Continued as proposed
AYES: Olague, Antonini, Borden,
Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
B. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed hereunder
constitute a Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine by the Planning
Commission, and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the
Commission. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member
of the Commission, the public, or staff so requests, in which event the matter
shall be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered as a separate item at
this or a future hearing
2.
2011.0451C
(K. Guy: (415) 558-6163)
1407 BUSH STREET
- south side between Polk Street and Van Ness Avenue; Lot 002A in Assessor’s
Block 0670 - Request for Conditional Use Authorization, pursuant to
Planning Code Sections 303 and 723.42, to establish a full-service restaurant
(dba "Fina Estampa") within the Polk Street Neighborhood Commercial District and
the 65-A Height and Bulk District. The size of the existing tenant space would
not change.
Preliminary Recommendation:
Approval with Conditions
SPEAKERS: John Nolte, Linda Chapman, Michael
Nulty
ACTION: Taken off consent calendar.
Approved with conditions
AYES: Olague, Antonini, Borden,
Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
MOTION: 18394
C.
COMMISSIONERS’ QUESTIONS AND MATTERS
Adoption of Commission
Minutes – Charter
Section 4.104 requires all commissioners to vote yes or no on all matters unless
that commissioner is excused by a vote of the Commission. Commissioners may not
be automatically excluded from a vote on the minutes because they did not attend
the meeting.
3. Consideration of
Adoption:
·
Draft Minutes
of Regular Meeting of May 5, 2011
·
Draft Minutes
of Regular Meeting of May 12, 2011
·
Draft Minutes
of Regular Meeting of May 19, 2011
·
Draft Minutes
of Regular Meeting of May 26, 2011
·
Draft Minutes
of Regular Meeting of June 16, 2011
·
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Olague, Antonini,
Borden, Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
4. Commission
Comments/Questions
·
Inquiries/Announcements.
Without discussion, at this time Commissioners may make announcements or
inquiries of staff regarding various matters of interest to the Commissioner(s).
·
Future
Meetings/Agendas.
At this time, the Commission may discuss and take action to set the date of a
Special Meeting and/or determine those items that could be placed on the agenda
of the next meeting and other future meetings of the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Antonini:
There was a really good article by Ken Garcia this Sunday in
the "Examiner," and it analyzes some of the reasons why many families are
leaving San Francisco. So, Ken Garcia should know he is a San Francisco Native
and attended St.Gabriel, when it was the largest school west of the Mississippi,
and what we found were people with families are not far away in the San Mateo
County and Marin County. The Pacifica has a lot of previous residents from the
Sunset. What is interesting is he talks about many of these same issues we talk
about here all the time -- difficulty with condo conversions for your own use,
difficulty getting unit mergers. Of course, the school system, it is not a
planning issue or has a relationship to it. So, very interesting that you have
hit upon these things. I think there are a lot of reasons, although we always
talk about cost. Cost is a factor, these residents in San Mateo County are
paying just as much. They can get housing with conditions that are more
acceptable to their families. We have to look at the process, what we're doing
to drive families away.
President Olague:
I just wanted to welcome Jose Campos. I do not know if you
have a few words for us at this time?
Go ahead, please. Tell us a little bit more about yourself.
Jose Campos:
President Olague, my name is Jose Campos. I am new to staff.
I am coming from Spain where I was the last six years, but prior to that, I was
a member of the San Francisco Planning Redevelopment Agency for eight years.
President Olague:
Welcome. I also want to acknowledge that we will have some of
the Chinatown Urban Institute with us today, so, if you have any questions, feel
free to contact us through the director on this, if you want to elaborate more,
understanding more about the workings of City Planning. Thank you.
We will spend the time with that. I wanted to acknowledge former Commissioner
Sue Lee is here.
Sadly, three members of San Francisco Planning family have passed away this
week, in the past two weeks actually. One being Secretary Linda Avery's sister,
and Anthony Urbina, he used to help us set up the meetings here, and finally
Roberts Pender, who was very active in the Parkmerced organization.
Finally, it yes, I think that sometimes -- the articles I
have read on the exodus of families tend not to be very cost conscious,
actually. They do not focus enough on the working class families, the challenges
they face, to certain pressures, especially the Mission and other neighborhoods
where you have seen an exodus of Latino families. It is important that we're not
just limited to a certain sector of those who are leaving. I think it is
important that we keep all families here, middle-class, above and below, and I
think it is important that we have a conversation that covers all of the above.
Commissioner Sugaya:
The conversation around families leaving the City is
complicated. There was a recent "New Yorker" article, actually a long book
review, talking about people leaving cities. For decades people are leaving
cities. Not just San Francisco, but all around the Country, and moving to the
suburbs. There are people moving back to San Francisco. They are different
population. That kind of thing is universally happening, so it is not just here
alone. I have not read the book that was given to us a couple weeks ago, but
that was one of the books that was mentioned, along with a few others. In
context, it is really not an isolated problem at all.
President Olague:
I think the same thing goes for manufacturing families and a
lot of other issues. It is not simply -- you know, it is not that simple.
Commissioner sugaya: I am not saying we shouldn't do something about it. It is
just more complicated.
D. DIRECTOR’S REPORT
5. Director’s
Announcements
John Rahaim:
I want to pass my condolences on to Linda Avery for the loss
of her sister, and also the Department felt condolences for the family of
Anthony Urbina, Anthony was a member of the City family for a very long time. He
passed away two weeks ago. Several members of the staff were able to attend the
funeral. Last week. I also wanted to welcome back President Miguel. It is good
to have you back, looking good and healthy as always. I also want to welcome
Jose Campos. Thank you and welcome.
A couple of things I wanted to report to you. The Governor
did indeed sign two bills last week related to Redevelopment Agencies, Senate
Bill 26 and 27. Those bills did take effect immediately upon his signature. In
summary, just where we are today, AB26 essentially prohibits redevelopment
agencies from taking on new actions, including incurring new debt or making new
loans or making new contracts or amending or adopting new redevelopment areas.
They are subject to a number of new responsibilities under this particular bill.
If the agencies do not comply with that provision they will dissolve as of
October 1st of this year, -- AB27 provides an exception to that.
Actions primarily require them to -- for the City to adopt an ordinance saying
it will volunteer to participate in the program, and that will require the City
to make payments to the County for distribution to schools, fire protection
agencies and transit agencies. I previously thought it was just schools, but it
was three different entities that would normally be the recipients of the funds.
That ordinance, if the City chooses to take this path has to be adopted by
November 1 of this year. So the City and the Redevelopment Agency are looking at
that right now. The cost is to be around $25 million. Whether the Agency would
be able to do that and move forward. That would have to occur before November 1st
of this year. Also, as you know, there have been a lot of discussions the past
few months. Agency is considering legal action. The League of California Cities
and the California Redevelopment Association, both of whom have claimed the Bill
is in conflict with Prop. 22, which the voters passed last year, it prohibits
the State from diverting funds from local development. There's an interesting
discussion to have over the coming months about the impact going forward. The
Governor did sign that Legislation on June 29th it is effective
immediately. The City has until November 1st to make a decision
about the alternative measure The next thing I wanted to mention -- as you
know, there are couple of ballot measures the Board has placed on the ballot. I
sent a memo to staff, just reminding all of us the measure is on the ballot.
Staff is not allowed to use office resources or spend City time to provide our
analysis of the ballot measure, as long is it is impartial and does not advocate
one way or another. One measure that is of interest to you, the proposal to
prohibit demolition of 15 or more units on a single property, except under
certain conditions that ballot measure is one of three. One of those more
pertinent to our work. The one exception to our taking the position is we are
allowed to attend the hearing next week at the Board to talk about what the
Department believes, an analysis about the ballot measure. The Board has asked
us to attend that hearing next week which is the same time as this hearing. I
will probably be attending that meeting next week, next Thursday afternoon. The
way the timing works at the Board -- there were four sponsors. If one of the
sponsors -- and I cannot remember the date, within a couple of weeks – If a
sponsor pulls from being a sponsor, they pull their name from the ballot. But it
cannot be changed, it can only be removed from the ballot. And finally, I just
want to say that next Wednesday, there is a ribbon cutting on Powell Street for
another one of our Pavement to Parks projects that staff has worked very heavily
on. It is where the cable car turns, effectively extends that first block
through the street and creates some much more pedestrian-oriented area. Found a
private sponsor to provide funds. Staff has worked on this for a long time.
That ribbon cutting is next Wednesday at 10:00 A.M., on Powell Street. That
concludes my presentation.
6. Review of Past
Week’s Events at the Board of Supervisors, Board of Appeals, and Historic
Preservation Commission.
BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS:
No meeting
BOARD OF
APPEALS:
No meeting
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION:
There were just
a couple of Certificate of Appropriateness.
E. GENERAL
PUBLIC COMMENT – 15 MINUTES
At this time, members of the
public may address the Commission on items of interest to the public that are
within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda items.
With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Commission will be
afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each member of the public may
address the Commission for up to three minutes.
SPEAKERS: Paul
Werner, Ernestine Weiss, Tim Foley, Linda Chapman
F. REGULAR CALENDAR
7.
(D. ALUMBAUGH: (415) 558-6601)
COMMUNITY VISION FOR SAN FRANCISCO’S NORTHEAST WATERFRONT
- On July 8, 2010, the Commission acknowledged the work of Department staff in
completing the Northeast Embarcadero Study and recognized the design principles
and recommendations of the study for public realm improvements and new
development in the area. At that same hearing, the Commission also urged the
Port of San Francisco to consider the principles and recommendations of the
Northeast Embarcadero Study when considering public infrastructure improvements
in the study area. Separately, a citizens group prepared its own study entitled
“A Community Vision for San Francisco’s Northeast Waterfront” and has requested
that they be given the opportunity to present their work to the Commission. It
is this group’s study that is the subject of this informational presentation.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Informational presentation only. No action required
SPEAKERS: Sue Lee, Keith Saggars, Lee
Radner, Bill Hannon, Unknown, Bill Banbovich, Nancy Shanahan, Bill Sarrow,
Cristina Weiss, John Ballanger, Katheleen Duley, Anne Roth, Jennifer Clay, Tim
Foley, Brad Paul, Sue Hestor
ACTION: Informational only – No action
required
8.
(J. NAVARRETE:
(415) 575-9040)
THE 34TH
AMERICA’S CUP AND JAMES R. HERMAN CRUISE TERMINAL AND NORTHEAST WHARF PLAZA
BRIEFING -
Informational Hearing
- 34th
America’s Cup Project Description: The 34th America’s Cup project
sponsors—the City and County of San Francisco (CCSF) and the America’s Cup Event
Authority—propose to host the 34th America’s Cup (AC34) sailing races in San
Francisco Bay. A series of AC34 yacht races would be held in San Francisco Bay
in 2012 (America’s Cup World Series) and in 2013 (Louis Vuitton Cup, America’s
Cup Challenger Series; potential America’s Cup Defender Selection Series; and
the Match). Several of the venues proposed for the AC34 events are piers, water
areas, and facilities managed by the Port of San Francisco (Port) including:
Piers (Piers 19, 19½, 23, 27-29½, 26, 28, 30-32, and 80), water basins/water
areas (Piers 9, 9-15, 17-19, 19-23, 23-27, 29‑31, 14-22½, 26‑28, 28-30, and
32-36), and Seawall Lot 330. Various other venues are proposed for
spectator‑related activities, some of which are under the jurisdiction of other
city, state or federal agencies, including Crissy Field, Marina Green, Fort
Mason, Aquatic Park, Alcatraz Island, Fort Baker Pier at Cavallo Point (near
Sausalito), San Francisco Civic Center, Union Square, and Justin Herman Plaza.
The event venues would include team bases and operations, support space, media
operations, hospitality services, sponsored commercial space, entertainment and
spectator areas, and temporary berthing and mooring facilities for race-related
and spectator vessels. Most of the facilities would be temporary and removed at
the conclusions of the events, although certain permanent infrastructure
improvements would be required at some of the proposed venue sites within the
Port's jurisdiction. The proposed project also includes a number of
implementation plans that address transportation management, waste management,
parks coordination and management, sustainability, water and air traffic, public
safety, youth involvement, and workforce development. The project would also
require amendments to the Special Area Plan (SAP) adopted by the Bay
Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC).
- Cruise
Terminal Project Description:
The Port of San Francisco proposes
the development of Pier 27 as the James R. Herman Cruise Terminal and Northeast
Wharf Plaza, which is proposed to be phased to allow proposed America’s Cup
Village uses at Piers 27-29, including an initial phase of the cruise terminal
building, for the 2013 America’s Cup races. The Cruise Terminal project would
involve demolition of the existing Pier 27 shed, a portion of the Pier 29 shed,
and Pier 27 Annex Building. The remainder of the Pier 29 shed would be retained
and rehabilitated, and the Belt Line office building would be retained. Proposed
improvements to complete the cruise terminal and wharf plaza would be built out
after the AC34 races are concluded. The proposed two-story cruise terminal
building would be approximately 91,200 square feet in size and would occupy a
footprint of approximately 46,100 square feet along Pier 27. The Pier 27 cruise
terminal would be designed to handle vessels carrying 2,600 to up to
4,000 passengers. The cruise terminal would include an approximately a 3-acre
ground transportation area, which would be located in the center of Piers 27-29,
to support access, drop-off, and exiting by trucks, taxis, buses, and passenger
vehicles to meet both ship provisioning and passenger loading needs of the
cruise terminal. The cruise terminal would also accommodate other uses between
ship calls, such as public or private gatherings, and maritime-oriented events.
The Northeast Wharf Plaza would provide an approximately 2½-acre open space at
the south end of Pier 27, fronting along The Embarcadero promenade and would
include a multi-use recreational space containing natural turf; pavers, concrete
seating/steps and planters; and ancillary structures for commercial and
recreational services. The cruise terminal and wharf plaza project would also
require amendments to the SAP adopted by BCDC.
Preliminary Recommendation: Informational only; no Commission action.
SPEAKERS: Michael Martin, Diane Oshima, Dan
Ohloff, Jennifer Chang, Teri Shore, Ernestine Weiss
ACTION: Informational only – No action
required
9.
2011.0526T
(S. Hayward: (415) 558-6372)
Creation of a Limited Live Performance Permit for indoor locales
- The Commission
will consider an Ordinance [Board File No. 11-0506] introduced by
Supervisors Mirkarimi, Wiener, Mar, and Campos amending Planning Code Sections
102.17 (Nighttime Entertainment Uses), 703.2 (Zoning Control Table), 790.38
(Entertainment, Other), 803.2 (Uses Permitted in Chinatown Mixed Use Districts),
803.3 (Uses Permitted in Eastern Neighborhoods Mixed Use Districts and South of
Market Use Mixed Use Districts), and 890.37 (Entertainment, Other) to create a
Limited Live Performance Permit for indoor locales whose primary function is not
presentation of live performances. The proposed permit would include noise and
hours restrictions, but not necessarily security plan requirements; specifying
application and license fees and hearing requirements for said permit; and
making findings, adopting findings, including environmental findings, Planning
Code Section 302 findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan and
the priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Modifications
SPEAKERS: Sup. Mirkarimi, Regina
Dick-Endrezzi, Paul Werner, Michael Wagner, Alex Walsh, Scott Kniper, Stephano
Costello
ACTION: Approved with Modifications,
as amended to lift window visibility restrictions
AYES: Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Miguel,
Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
RESOLUTION: 18395
10a.
2006.0974D
(S. HAYWARD: (415) 558-6372)
1710 DIAMOND STREET - west side between Valley Street and Diamond
Heights Boulevard; Lot 102 in Assessor’s Block 7535 - Mandatory Discretionary
Review, pursuant to Planning Code Section 317(d), of Demolition Permit
Application No. 2007.02.06.3541, proposing to demolish a one-story single-family
residential building within the RM-1 (Residential Mixed, Low-Density) Zoning
District and 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Staff Analysis: Full Discretionary Review
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take
Discretionary Review and approve
SPEAKERS: Victor Quan, Gabriel Ng
ACTION: Did not take DR and approved
AYES: Olague, Antonini,
Borden, Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
DRA: 0221
10b.
2011.0632D
(S.
HAYWARD: (415) 558-6372)
1710 DIAMOND STREET
- west side between Valley Street and Diamond Heights Boulevard; Lot 102 in
Assessor’s Block 7535 - Mandatory Discretionary Review, pursuant to
Planning Code Section 317(d), of Building Permit Application Nos.
2007.02.06.3543, 2007.02.06.3548, 2007.02.06.3550, and 2007.02.06.3551 proposing
to construct four new single-family residential buildings within the RM-1
(Residential Mixed, Low-Density) Zoning District and 40-X Height and Bulk
District.
Staff Analysis: Full Discretionary Review
Preliminary Recommendation: Take Discretionary
Review and approve with modifications
SPEAKERS: Victor Quan, Gabriel Ng
ACTION: Did not take DR and approved
with conditions to continue working with staff on exterior details
AYES: Olague, Antonini,
Borden, Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
11.
2010.1028C
(T. Wang: (415) 558-6335)
4124 MISSION STREET
- northwest side between Admiral Avenue and Trumbull Street; Lot 001 in
Assessor’s Block 6804 - Request for Conditional Use Authorization,
pursuant to Planning Code Sections 303, 711.54 and 790.60 to convert a vacant
ground floor commercial space into a massage establishment (dba Miracle Chi Gone
Massage) within the NC-2 (Small-Scale Neighborhood Commercial) District and a
40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation:
Approval with Conditions, to provide a Community Liaison
(Continued from Regular
Meeting of May 19, 2011)
NOTE: On May 19, 2011, following public testimony,
the Commission continued it to 7/7/11 to allow continued conversations with the
community; PH remains open.
SPEAKERS: Steven Currier
ACTION: Approved with conditions to
provide a Community Liaison
AYES: Olague, Antonini,
Borden, Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
MOTION:
18396
12.
2011.0208C
(K. DURANDET: (415) 575-6816)
2730 21ST STREET - northeast corner at Bryant Street, Lot 024 of
Assessor’s Block 4087 - Request for Conditional Use Authorization,
pursuant to Planning Code Sections 178 and 186 to add DJ music to an existing
Limited Commercial Use authorized as a bar per Motion No. 9074 (d.b.a. Asiento)
within the RM-1 (Residential Mixed-Low Density) Zoning District, and a 40-X
Height and Bulk District. If granted, the Conditional Use Authorization would
allow the applicant to seek an Entertainment License for Other Entertainment as
defined is Planning Code Section 790.38.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with
Conditions
SPEAKERS: Ian Chang, Christopher Moskolonek,
Steve Wasserman
ACTION: Approved with conditions as
amended, lifting music restriction to 2:00 a.m.
AYES: Olague, Antonini,
Borden, Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
MOTION: 18398
13.
2010.1042C
(E. JACKSON: (415) 558-6363)
660-670 4TH STREET – corner of 4th and Bluxome
Streets, Lots 104-160 of Assessor’s Block 3786 - Request for Conditional Use
Authorization pursuant to Planning Code Sections 227(h), 303, and 842.93 to
install a wireless telecommunications facility consisting of 10 new antennas and
6 new cabinets on the rooftop on an existing 7 story mixed use building. The
project site is within a MUO (Mixed Use Office) Zoning District and a 85-X
Height and Bulk District. The proposal is part of a wireless transmission
network operated by AT&T on a Location Preference 5 (Preferred Location – Mixed
Use Buildings in High Density Districts) according to the Wireless
Telecommunications Services (WTS) Siting Guidelines.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
(Continued from
Regular Meeting of June 2, 2011)
SPEAKERS: Tedi Virnais
ACTION: Approved with conditions
AYES: Olague, Antonini,
Borden, Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
MOTION: 18399
14.
2009.0651C
(B.
Fu: (415) 558-6613)
2045-2121 EVANS STREET
- west side between Cesar Chavez and Napoleon Streets, Lots 001B & 002 in
Assessor’s Block 4343 - Request for Conditional Use Authorization under
Planning Code Sections 157 and 303 to allow parking in excess of accessory
amounts for the proposed Restaurant Depot building expansion, within the PDR-2
(Core Production, Distribution, and Repair) Zoning District and a 65-J Height
and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
(Continued from Regular Meeting of June 16, 2011)
SPEAKERS: Andrew Junius, Michael Kniyaie,
Pat Buskovich
ACTION: Approved with conditions
AYES: Olague, Antonini,
Borden, Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
MOTION: 18400
TAKEN OUT OF ORDER AFTER ITEM NO. 11
15.
2011.0326C
(R. SUCRE: (415) 575-9108)
50 OTIS
STREET -
northeast corner of Otis and Brady Streets, Lot 021 in Assessor’s Block 3505 -
Request for Conditional Use Authorization under Planning Code Sections
731.59 and 303 to convert an existing contractor’s shop and warehouse (trade
shop use category) into a motorcycle repair shop (automotive repair use
category; d.b.a. Tokyo Moto) within the NCT-3 (Moderate Scale Neighborhood
Commercial Transit) Zoning District and a 50-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with
Conditions
SPEAKERS: Gary Bell, Jeremy Paul
ACTION: Approved with conditions
AYES: Olague, Antonini,
Borden, Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
MOTION: 18397
16.
2011.0443C
(S.
Vellve: (415) 558-6263)
3111 FILLMORE STREET
- west side between Filbert and Pixley Streets; Lot 009 in Assessor’s Block 0515
- Request for Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Planning Code
Section 303, to modify conditions of approval placed on the existing “Other
Entertainment” use (d.b.a. The Comet Club) in Motion 18180, Case No. 2010.0255C,
to extend the hours of amplified and acoustical live entertainment on the
premises until 2 AM on Thursday nights within the Union Street Neighborhood
Commercial and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation:
Approval with Conditions
SPEAKERS: Jeremy Paul
ACTION: Approved with conditions
AYES: Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Miguel,
Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
MOTION: 18401
17.
2011.0454D
(G. Cabreros: (415) 558-6169)
610 EL CAMINO DEL MAR - west side between Seacliff and McLaren Avenues, Lot 001X
in Assessor’s Block 1307 - Request for Discretionary Review of Building
Permit Application No. 2010.09.20.1192, proposing to construct a roof deck on
the main roof, a rear terrace and facade alterations to the
two-story-over-basement, single-family house within the RH-1(D) (Residential,
House, One-Family, Detached) Zoning District and 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Staff Analysis: Abbreviated Discretionary Review
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review
and approve
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW APPLICATION WITHDRAWN
18.
2011.0389DDD
(A. STARR: (415) 558-6362)
2040 JACKSON STREET
- north side between Laguna and Octavia Streets; Lot 004A in Assessor's Block
0591 - Requests for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application
No. 2010.11.03.4269 proposing to construct a three-story rear horizontal
addition, a stair and elevator penthouse, and a roof deck on a three-story
single-family house within the RH-1 (Residential, House, One-Family) Zoning
District and 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Staff Analysis: Abbreviated
Discretionary Review
Preliminary Recommendation: Do
not take Discretionary Review and approve as revised
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: Continued to 9/29/11
AYES: Olague, Antonini,
Borden, Fong, Miguel, Sugaya
ABSENT: Moore
G.
PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of
the public may address the Commission on items of interest to the public that
are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda
items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Commission
will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception.
When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which
members of the public were allowed to testify and the Commission has closed the
public hearing, your opportunity to address the Commission must be exercised
during the Public Comment portion of the Calendar. Each member of the public
may address the Commission for up to three minutes.
The Brown Act forbids a
commission from taking action or discussing any item not appearing on the posted
agenda, including those items raised at public comment. In response to public
comment, the commission is limited to:
(1) responding to statements
made or questions posed by members of the public; or
(2) requesting staff to report
back on a matter at a subsequent meeting; or
(3)
directing staff
to place the item on a future agenda. (Government Code Section 54954.2(a))
Adjournment: 6:30 PM
Adopted: October 6, 2011
