New Page 1
SAN FRANCISCO
PLANNING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes
Commission Chambers - Room 400
City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
Thursday, March 3, 2011
1:30 PM
Regular Meeting
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY PRESIDENT OLAGUE AT 1:40 PM
STAFF IN ATTENDANCE: John Rahaim – Director Planning, Scott Sanchez – Zoning
Administrator, Erika Jackson, Tara Sullivan, Aaron Starr, Diego Sanchez, Glenn
Cabreros, Michael E. Smith, Kevin Guy, AnMarie Rodgers – Acting Commission
Secretary
A.
CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS PROPOSED FOR CONTINUANCE
The Commission
will consider a request for continuance to a later date. The Commission may
choose to continue the item to the date proposed below, to continue the item to
another date, or to hear the item on this calendar.
1a.
2010.0367DDV
(B. FU: (415) 558-6613)
54-62 Peralta Street
- Requests for Discretionary Review for Building Permit Application Nos.
2009.1231.4050 and 2009.1231.4052 proposing to construct two new three-story,
two-family dwellings on two adjacent down-sloping lots, in a RH-2 (Residential,
Two-Family House) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District, and within the
Bernal Heights Special Use District.
Staff Analysis: Full Discretionary Review
Preliminary Recommendation: Not Take Discretionary Review and approve as
proposed.
(Proposed for Continuance to March 17, 2011)
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION:
Continued as proposed
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
1b.
2010.0367DDV
54-62 Peralta Street
- Request for off-street parking Variance pursuant to Planning Code
Section 242(e)(4) for the proposed construction of two new three-story,
two-family dwellings on two adjacent down-sloping lots, in a RH-2 (Residential,
Two-Family House) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District, and within the
Bernal Heights Special Use District.
(Proposed for
Continuance to March 17, 2011)
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION:
Continued as proposed
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
2. 2011.0105T
(K. DISCHINGER: (415) 558-6284)
Amending Planning Code Inclusionary Housing controls to Add New Alternative in
Market and Octavia Plan Area [BOS FILE NO. 11-0085]
- Hearing of a proposed Ordinance that would amend the San Francisco Planning
Code by amending Section 415.5 to provide for a new land dedication alternative
in the Market and Octavia Plan Area in lieu of payment of the Affordable Housing
Fee; and adding Section 415.10 to provide for the requirements of such land
dedication; and making various findings including environmental findings,
Planning Code Section 101 and 302 findings, and General Plan consistency
findings. The Commission will consider the proposed Ordinance, introduced by
Supervisor Dufty, which would amend the Planning Code as described with
additional modifications as recommended by the Planning Department.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Approval with Modifications
(Proposed for
Continuance to May 5, 2011)
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION:
Continued as proposed
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
3.
(L. AVERY: (415) 558-6407)
COMMISSION’S RULES & REGULATIONS – The Planning Commission will hold a
public hearing to discuss and consider amending its Rules and Regulations that
could include, but is not limited to, establishing parameters for the length of
its public hearings; consider amendments to the public’s requests for blocks of
time; and consider possible amendments for the submitting of documents.
(Proposed for
Continuance to March 17, 2011)
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION:
Continued as proposed
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
B. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Calendar, are considered to be
routine by the Planning Commission, and will be acted upon by a single roll call
vote of the Commission. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a member of the Commission, the public, or staff so requests, in which
event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered as a
separate item at this or a future hearing
4. 2011.0010C
(E. JACKSON: (415) 558-6363)
1493 VALENCIA STREET
- east side between 25th and 26th Streets; Lot 043 in Assessor’s Block 6530 -
Request for Conditional Use Authorization, pursuant to Planning Code
Sections 303, 726.1, and 790.60, to convert the ground floor of an existing
building to a new massage establishment, within the Valencia Street Neighborhood
Commercial Transit District (Valencia NCT) and a 55-X Height and Bulk District.
The project proposes a new foot massage business (dba Relax Feet Massage) in a
1,000 square foot commercial space on the ground floor.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION:
Approved
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
MOTION: 12286
5.
2011.0021U
(T. Sullivan: (415) 558-6257)
2011 Large Tourist Hotel Annual Inventory
- Section 41F.3(g) of the Administrative Code requires that an annual
inventory of the number of rooms commercially available for rent as of March 1,
2011 in Large Tourist Hotels (hotels with over 100 rooms) be adopted by the
Planning Commission. The Commission adopted a Baseline Inventory in Resolution
No. 17822 on February 5, 2009. The Administrative Code further requires that an
annual inventory of the number of Tourist Hotel Rooms commercially available for
rent be updated each year thereafter. This hearing is for the Commission to
consider adoption of the 2011 Annual Inventory to update the Baseline
Inventory. More information is available at
http://www.sfgov.org/site/planning_index.asp?id=81515.
Preliminary Recommendation: Adoption of Baseline Inventory.
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION:
Although this item was pulled off the Consent Calendar by staff to update, the
Commission approved the Adoption of Baseline Inventory
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
MOTION: 18925
C. COMMISSIONERS’ QUESTIONS AND MATTERS
6. Commission Comments/Questions
·
Inquiries/Announcements. Without discussion, at this time Commissioners may
make announcements or inquiries of staff regarding various matters of interest
to the Commissioner(s).
·
Future Meetings/Agendas. At this time, the Commission may discuss and take
action to set the date of a Special Meeting and/or determine those items that
could be placed on the agenda of the next meeting and other future meetings of
the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Moore:
Following up our discussion on the Housing Plan the other week, in an
international survey, the statistics say that Australian homes are the most [the
rest of the comment was not clear.] It goes on to say that the United States in
general is seen as the cheapest country given the amount of mass production we
have in housing. However, when it comes to looking at the prices in the United
States, the most expensive communities in the country are San Francisco and San
Jose, which toped the survey list as the least affordable housing market with
home prices 5.1 times the household income, which is considered severely
unaffordable. I that that was very interesting because it puts another level
of complexity in how we discuss affordable housing, and how we discuss housing
per say. I just wanted to bring that to your attention and I would be happy to
email that to you.
Commissioner Miguel:
This week I’ve met with some of the Bartlet Street neighbors regarding an item
that is on today’s calendar. On Monday and Tuesday, I had the pleasure of being
a speaker at an international conference here in San Francisco on Electric
Vehicle Infrastructure. It has implications to an extent for Planning and to an
extent for DBI because of our very old infrastructure in San Francisco of trying
to shoehorn in what is going to be necessary to the roll out of electric
vehicles. It’s interesting that they are presuming that the electric vehicles
will be picked up by what they term early responders in the public. But what
they are looking at are the figures on Prius sales and other hybrid sales. 25%
of all hybrid sales in the United States are in California. We are dubbed the
“early adapters.” Therefore, it is less of a problem in an area where it is ¾
single-family homes and you charge in your garage at night, but when you get
into San Francisco where the majority of our population lives in rental housing
and the majority of the rental housing is in multi-family buildings, we run into
a very different situation. It was a very interesting conference and something
I’m sure will come before us in the near future.
Commissioner Sugaya:
This last week I attended two meetings in Japantown. One had to do with a
community meeting on the issue of historic landmarks in the Japantown area. It
was informational to get input. There was no consensus or decisions made at
that point. That will be fed into the Japantown Better Neighborhoods Plan that
will be forth coming at the end of this year I think. Secondly, it was more of
a tour put on by Supervisor Mirkarimi to acquaint Mayor Lee with the issues in
Japantown. We had a walking tour of the area followed by a lunch at which
different issues were discussed. It was quite interesting because at the end of
the lunch, the Mayor had taken notes on each of the issues and surprisingly
committed himself to working on four of those issues and said that he would be
following up with the community.
Commissioner Antonini:
Yesterday, Commissioner Sugaya and I were able to participate in one of the
Design Review team’s sessions. It was very impressive. They went through three
projects very quickly and I think, very efficiently. I got some idea about what
kind of changes they will recommend on these. Afterward we met with David
Alumbaugh and other staff members regarding the public safety building on 3rd
and Mission Rock. Because it is a public building, it will not be before us for
design review unlike other Mission Bay properties which are private. But having
seen some sketches in the Chronicle I thought it was important to weigh in if
possible and the involved parties were very receptive to our comments. I’ve
already met with one of the architects that is involved. If the public is
interested, it is going to be before the Design Team of the Arts Commission. It
would be good to get in early on this; take a look at it; see if you like the
way it looks; and comment accordingly so they can help to build something
because it will stand out. It will be something that will be very visible
there. It will include the Southern Station of the Police headquarters; a new
fire station; the historic fire station will be renovated there.
Commissioner Borden:
I was just in Washington D.C. and I saw that they have installed their
bike-sharing stations. I know that the city had talked about bike sharing, and
I just wondered if maybe we can have someone from MTA talk about their plans
there.
Commissioner Moore:
I had to cancel the meeting with the Design Review team yesterday, but will
reschedule. This will allow other commissioners that haven’t had the
opportunity to also attend or participate with me. She will come back with
other dates for those who are interested.
D. DIRECTOR’S REPORT
7.
Director’s Announcements
Director Rahaim:
I just want to remind you that if you have any final comments on the Housing
Element to try to get those to staff in the next few days if possible. We would
like to get you the final edited version about two weeks in advance of the
hearing, which would be next Thursday. Also, I’d like to remind you that there
is a special morning meeting on March 17th – two weeks from today –
as an informational hearing on Executive Park. Last, I believe there was no
Board of Appeals meeting this week so there is no report.
8. Review of Past Week’s Events at the Board of Supervisors, Board of
Appeals, and Historic Preservation Commission.
LAND USE COMMITTEE of the BOARD OF SUPPERVISORS:
·
Area Plan Waiver Criteria for Affordable Housing-.
This proposed
Ordinance would amend the existing waiver of certain Area Plan fees under
certain conditions including if a project has affordable housing. The proposed
changes contained in this Ordinance were considered by the Planning Commission
on December 9, 2010, as part of a proposed Ordinance to amend to the Visitacion
Valley Community Facilities and Infrastructure Fee and Fund (Board File No.
101247). At that time, the Planning Department recommended that the legislation
be approved as proposed but the Commission did not pass a recommendation other
than a respectful recommendation that Supervisor Maxwell continue working with
all parties on the issue of fees. This week the Committee recommended
approval of the Ordinance to the Full Board.
FULL BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS:
·
136 Ord Street Cat Ex Appeal.
This item was before the Planning Commission as a Discretionary Review. The
Commission approved the project on DR. At the Full Board, the Corbett Heights
Neighborhood Association and a neighbor were the appellants. They made three
primary charges against the issuance of the Cat Ex. I will summarize those
charges and the Department’s response:
1.
The Planning Department failed to
conduct proper historic review of the subject property and the proposed project.
The Department conducted an historic resource evaluation of 136 Ord Street in
2008. At that time, Preservation staff conducted a thorough analysis based upon
research and historic records and concluded that the existing cottage is NOT a
historic resource nor is the subject property located in a potential historic
district. In 2009, when the project sponsor submitted his building permit
application, he changed the scope of work from altering the existing cottage at
the rear to constructing a new dwelling structure near the front of the
property. Since the Department had already conducted an historic resource
evaluation in 2008 and already concluded there is no historic resource or a
potential historic district present, there was no need to conduct another
historic resource evaluation.
2.
136 Ord Street is a historic resource.
In order to qualify as a historic resource, the building must be significant
under the California Register. With the inability to meet any of the four
criteria set forth under the California Register, 136 Ord Street is NOT a
historic resource or that there would be a significant impact to off-site
resources.
3.
The proposed project will have a
negative and “cumulative” impact to off-site historic resources. There is no substantial
and/or credible evidence provided by the Appellant or in the record to support
the conclusion that 136 Ord Street is located in a potential historic district.
Conclusion:
The item had a lot of public comment, many in opposition as well as in support
of the project. The Board stated that the review process conducted by Planning
could have been better but in the end the Board believed that Planning performed
adequate analysis of the site and the neighborhood before arriving to their
conclusion that the subject property is not a historic resource. The Board
upheld the Cat Ex 11-0.
INTRODUCTIONS:
·
Mayor Lee introduced Various Ordinances to Implement the Treasure Island Yerba
Buena Redevelopment –
Included among
the legislation introduced is the Planning Code Amendment, the General Plan
Amendment, and Zoning Map Amendment as well as the Development Agreement and the
Redevelopment Plan Amendment. These items are currently planed to be before
this Commission in April.
BOARD OF APPEALS:
·
The Board of Appeals heard a rehearing request for a variance at 1269 Lombard
Street
(note this is across the street from an item on your calendar for later today at
1268 Lombard). The case at the B of A, 1269 Lombard, was subject to a joint DR
and variance hearing on June 24, 2010 - the Commission approved the project and
Acting Zoning Administrator Rahaim granted the variance.
On December 15, 2010, the Board of Appeals upheld the subject variance (4-1).
The rehearing request was filed on December 27, 2010 and initially scheduled for
January 12, 2011. The Appellant subsequently appealed the CEQA determination
for the project, which was unanimously upheld by the Board of Supervisors.
Last night, the Board of Appeals denied the jurisdiction request (3-1-1).
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION:
No report
E. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT – 15 MINUTES
At this time, members of the public may address the Commission on items of
interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the
Commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity
to address the Commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the
meeting. Each member of the public may address the Commission for up to three
minutes.
SPEAKERS: Kathleen
Courtney
Re: 1945 Hyde Street – EIR
F. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS WHERE THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN
CLOSED
At
this time, members of the public who wish to address the Commission on agenda
items that have already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of
the public were allowed to testify and the public hearing has been closed, must
do so at this time. Each member of the public may address the Commission for up
to three minutes.
None
G.
CONSIDERATION OF FINDINGS AND FINAL ACTION – PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
9a.
2009.0175C
(A. Starr: (415) 558-6362)
5495 CALIFORNIA STREET & 214-216 17th AVENUE
- southeast corner of California
Street and 17th Avenue; Lot 031 in Assessor’s Block 1417 - Request for
Conditional Use Authorization, pursuant to Planning Code Sections 303, 317,
710.11 and 710.39 to allow the demolition of a 2-story, 2-unit building and the
construction of a 4-story, 3-unit building and to allow the development of a lot
greater than 4,999 sq. ft. in area within the Neighborhood Commercial – Cluster
District (NC-1) and 40-X Height and Bulk District. The project also includes
demolishing a rear portion of the commercial buildings on the corner of
California Street and 17th Avenue, subdividing the 5,088 sq. ft. subject lot
into two lots, and constructing a vertical addition (that will contain one
residential unit) above the existing commercial building.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
(Continued from Regular Meeting of
January 27, 2011)
NOTE: On January 27, 2011, following public testimony, the Commission continued
the matter to 3/3/11 by a vote of (+5 -0), directing the project sponsor to work
with Department staff to refine the project's design. Fong was absent; Antonini
was recused.
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Miguel,
Olague, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
RECUSED Antonini
MOTION: 18287
9b. 2009.0175CV
(A.
Starr: (415) 558-6362)
5495 CALIFORNIA STREET & 214-216 – 17th AVENUE
- southeast corner of California Street and 17th Avenue; Lot 031 in Assessor’s
Block 1417 - Request for Rear Yard and Active Street Frontage Variances
pursuant to Section 134, 710.12 and 145.1 of the Planning Code for the
construction of a 4-story, 3-unit building and constructing a vertical addition
(that will contain one residential unit) above the existing commercial building
within the Neighborhood Commercial – Cluster District (NC-1) and 40-X Height and
Bulk District. The project also includes the demolition of a 2-story, 2-unit
building, the demolition of a rear portion of the commercial buildings on the
corner of California Street and 17th Avenue, and subdividing the 5,088 sq. ft.
subject lot into two lots.
(Continued from Regular Meeting of January 27, 2011)
NOTE: On January 27, 2011, The Zoning Administrator closed the public hearing on
the related Variance request and continued the item to March 3, 2011.
SPEAKERS: Same
as those listed for item 9a
ACTION:
The Zoning Administrator closed the public hearing and granted the variance
request
H.
REGULAR CALENDAR
10.
2011.0046T
(A. RODGERS: (415) 558-6395)
Amending Planning Code CONTROLS for the NC-3 District of Fillmore Street between
Bush and McAllister Streets [BOS FILE NO. 11-0010]
- Hearing of a proposed Ordinance that would amend the San Francisco Planning
Code by amending Section 145.4 of the Code to require active ground-floor
commercial uses in properties fronting on Fillmore Street between Bush and
McAllister Streets in the NC-3 District; and making various findings including
environmental findings, Planning Code Section 101 and 302 findings, and General
Plan consistency findings. The Commission will consider the proposed Ordinance,
introduced by Supervisor Mirkarimi, which would amend the Planning Code as
described with additional modifications as recommended by the Planning
Department.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Modifications
SPEAKERS: Tom
Radulovich
ACTION:
Approved
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
MOTION: 18288
11.
2010.0628C
(D. Sánchez: (415) 575-9082)
2740 Mission Street -
west side between 23rd and 24th
streets - Lot 005 in Assessor’s Block 3643 - Request for Conditional Use
Authorization under Planning Code Sections 703.4, 736.24 and 303 to
establish a full service restaurant (dba Pollo Campero) identified as a formula
retail use with an outdoor activity area not contiguous to the front property
line within the Mission Street Neighborhood Commercial Transit District with a
80-B Height and Bulk designation.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
(Continued from Regular Meeting of February 17, 2011)
SPEAKERS: Timmy
Lai, Mark Quinlan, Jeremy Decker, George Rodgers, Casey Holtz, Katherine Dans,
Luis Aguilar, Yishi Lerner, Beth Burkhart, Paul Knudsen, Sean Flanagan, J.
Carlos Zorrilla, Dennis Thoele, Tami Jew, Tim Ehertide, Wendy Weiden, Zahavah
Levine, Nancy Adams, Nina Hollman, Craig Powers, Ben Calderon, Debra Jue, Jorge
Garcia Linares, Philip Lesser, Jeffrey Cluett, Drane Robbins, Dennis Marzan,
Ramiro Torrico, Theodore Ordon-Kanssi, David Blattess, Matilde Tellez, Jose
Canseco, Melquis Naveo, Oscar M. Grande, Alicia Briceno
ACTION:
1) entertained motion to modify conditions – motion failed; 2) motion to
cont. to 5/19/11 passed (+4 -3)
AYES:
Miguel, Borden, Moore and Sugaya
NAYES: Antonini, Olague, Fong
12.
2010.0802D
(G. CABREROS: (415) 558-6169)
2774-2776 Filbert Street
- north side between Baker and Broderick Streets; Lot 014A in Assessor's Block
0942 - Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application
No. 2009.09.09.6467 proposing to construct a one-story vertical addition to the
existing three-story, two-unit building resulting in a four-story, two-unit
building in an RH-2 (Residential House, Two-Family) District and a 40-X Height
and Bulk District.
Staff Analysis: Abbreviated Discretionary Review
Preliminary Recommendation: Take Discretionary Review
and Approve with modifications
(Continued from Regular Meeting of December 16, 2010)
SPEAKERS:
Patricia Vaughey, David Thompson, Patricia Houden,
ACTION:
Take Discretionary Review and approve with modifications
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Moore and Sugaya
RECUSED
Fong
DRA: 0200
13.
2011.0100D
(M. SMITH: (415) 558-6322)
422 DAY STREET - north side between
Castro and Noe Streets; Lot 009 in Assessor's Block 6630 - Staff Initiated
Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No.
2010.09.14.0807 proposing to construct a one-story vertical addition to the
existing two-story, single-family dwelling resulting in a three-story,
single-family dwelling in an RH-1 (Residential House, One-Family) District and a
40-X Height and Bulk District.
Staff Analysis: Full Discretionary Review
Preliminary Recommendation: Take Discretionary Review and approve with
modifications.
SPEAKERS:
Jennifer Hwang. Mary Ellen O’Connor, David Davidovic, John Teerlink, Jean
Craig-Teerlink, Erica Davidovic, Mary Macy
ACTION:
Take Discretionary Review and approve with Department’s modifications.
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Fong, and Moore
NAYES: Antonini, Borden, and Sugaya
DRA: 0201
5:00 P.M
14a.
2007.0903
(K. GUY: (415) 558-6163)
TREASURE ISLAND/YERBA BUENA ISLAND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - INFORMATIONAL ONLY;
Lots 001 and 002 in Assessor's Block 1939 - Informational presentation to
provide an overview regarding the Treasure Island/Yerba Buena Island
Redevelopment Project and associated components including: (1) Parks and Open
Space Plan, (2) Sustainability Plan, (3) Infrastructure Plan, and (4) Financing
Plan. The project proposes approximately 8,000 dwelling units, 140,000 square
feet of retail uses, 100,000 square feet on commercial office space, 500 hotel
rooms, 300 acres of open space, and various public services, civic, and
institutional uses.
Preliminary Recommendation: Informational Presentation Only
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: INFORMATIONAL – NO ACTION REQUIRED
14b.
2007.0903MTZ
(K.
GUY: (415) 558-6163)
TREASURE ISLAND/YERBA BUENA ISLAND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - Lots 001 and 002 in
Assessor's Block 1939; Request to Initiate Amendments to the General Plan,
in order to incorporate into the General Plan policies and figures that
facilitate the development of the Treasure Island/Yerba Buena Island
Redevelopment Project, including the Commerce and Industry Element, Community
Facilities Element, Community Safety Element, Housing Element, Recreation and
Open Space Element, Transportation Element, Urban Design Element, and Land Use
Index, and maps and figures in various elements. The Treasure Island/Yerba Buena
Island Redevelopment Project proposes approximately 8,000 dwelling units,
140,000 square feet of retail uses, 100,000 square feet on commercial office
space, 500 hotel rooms, 300 acres of open space, and various public services,
civic, and institutional uses.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approve Resolution to Initiate
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION:
Approved
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
RESOLUTION: 18291
14c.
2007.0903MTZ
(K.
GUY: (415) 558-6163)
TREASURE ISLAND/YERBA BUENA ISLAND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - Lots 001 and 002 in
Assessor's Block 1939; Request to Initiate Amendments to the Planning Code,
to amend Section 105 relating to height and bulk limits for Treasure Island
and Yerba Buena Island, establish the Treasure Island/Yerba Buena Island Special
Use District, establish the "TI" Height and Bulk District, including special
height provisions for the Treasure Island/Yerba Buena Island Special Use
District and the "TI" Height and Bulk District, and amend the bulk limits table
associated with Section 270 to recognize this district. These amendments are
related to the Treasure Island/Yerba Buena Island Redevelopment Project, which
proposes approximately 8,000 dwelling units, 140,000 square feet of retail uses,
100,000 square feet on commercial office space, 500 hotel rooms, 300 acres of
open space, and various public services, civic, and institutional uses.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approve Resolution to Initiate
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION:
Approved
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
RESOLUTION: 18292
14d.
2007.0903MTZ
(K.
GUY: (415) 558-6163)
TREASURE ISLAND/YERBA BUENA ISLAND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - Lots 001 and 002 in
Assessor's Block 1939; Request to Initiate Amendments to the Zoning Map,
to show the zoning designations of Treasure Island and Yerba Buena Island,
establish the "TI" Height and Bulk District for Treasure Island and Yerba Buena
Island, and establish the Treasure Island/Yerba Buena Island Special Use
District add new Sectional Map SU14 to establish the Treasure Island/Yerba Buena
Island Special Use District. These amendments are related to the Treasure
Island/Yerba Buena Island Redevelopment Project, which proposes approximately
8,000 dwelling units, 140,000 square feet of retail uses, 100,000 square feet on
commercial office space, 500 hotel rooms, 300 acres of open space, and various
public services, civic, and institutional uses.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approve Resolution to Initiate
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION:
Approved
AYES:
Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Borden, Fong, Moore and Sugaya
RESOLUTION: 18293
I. PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of
the public may address the Commission on items of interest to the public that
are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda
items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Commission
will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception.
When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which
members of the public were allowed to testify and the Commission has closed the
public hearing, your opportunity to address the Commission must be exercised
during the Public Comment portion of the Calendar. Each member of the public
may address the Commission for up to three minutes.
The Brown Act forbids a
commission from taking action or discussing any item not appearing on the posted
agenda, including those items raised at public comment. In response to public
comment, the commission is limited to:
(1) responding to statements made or questions posed by members of the public;
or
(2) requesting staff to report back on a matter at a subsequent meeting; or
(3)
directing staff to place the item on a future agenda. (Government Code Section
54954.2(a))
SPEAKERS: None
Adjournment: 8:25 PM
Adopted:
April 21, 2011
