November 20, 2014

ROLL CALL:                                                                         

                                            President:                                Cindy Wu

                                            Vice-President:                      Rodney Fong

                                            Commissioners:                    Michael J. Antonini; Rich Hillis; Christine Johnson

                                                                                                Kathrin Moore; Dennis Richards

 

A.            CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS PROPOSED FOR CONTINUANCE

 

The Commission will consider a request for continuance to a later date.  The Commission may choose to continue the item to the date proposed below, to continue the item to another date, or to hear the item on this calendar.

 

1.                   2014.0966T                                                                                           (K. DISCHINGER: (415) 558-6284)

2013 CITYWIDE NEXUS STUDY -  Planning Code Amendment to adopt the San Francisco Citywide Nexus Analysis supporting existing development fees, including fees in the Downtown and other Area Plans, to cover impacts of residential and commercial development in the areas of recreation and open space; pedestrian and streetscape improvements; childcare; and bicycle infrastructure; making findings related to all of the fees in Article IV generally and certain development fees supported by the Nexus Analysis specifically; and making environmental findings and findings of consistency with the General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1.  Preliminary Recommendation: Adoption

(Proposed for Continuance to December 11, 2014)

 

2.                   2013.1340D                                                                                                        (J. LOOK: (415) 575-6812)

1423 OCEAN AVENUE - south side between Granada Avenue and Miramar Avenue; Lot 063 in Assessor’s Block 6941 - Request for a Mandatory Discretionary Review, pursuant to Planning Code Section 737.84 and 790.141 in association with Building Permit Application No. 2013.04.23.5179, proposing to establish a Medical Cannabis Dispensary (d.b.a.  “Bay Area Compassionate Health Center”) on the ground floor of an existing building, this project lies within the Ocean Avenue NCT (Neighborhood Commercial Transit ) Zoning District and 45-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Preliminary Recommendation:  Take Discretionary Review and Approve the MCD with Conditions

                                (Continued from Regular Meeting of May 22, 2014)

                        NOTE: On May 22, 2014, following public testimony, the Commission continued the matter to July 17, 2014 by a vote of +6 -0 (Commissioner Antonini was recused).

                                (Continued from Regular Meeting of July 17, 2014)

(Proposed for Continuance to February 5, 2015)

 

B.         CONSENT CALENDAR

 

All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission, and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Commission.  There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the Commission, the public, or staff so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing

 

3.                   2014.1540Q                                                                                                     (A. PERRY: (415) 575-9017)

3330-3334 16TH STREET - north side of 16^th Street between Dolores Street and Landers Street on Assessor’s Block 3557, Lot 014 - Request for Condominium Conversion Subdivision to convert a three-story-over-garage, six-unit building within a RTO (Residential Transit Oriented) and 40-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.                   

Preliminary Recommendation:  Approve

 

4.                   2014.1146C                                                                                                (E. JARDINES: (415) 575-9144)

2575 3^RD STREET - east side between 22^nd and 23rd Streets; Lot 001 in Assessor’s Block 4173 - Request for Conditional Use Authorization, pursuant to Planning Code Sections 249.37, 843.45 and 303, to allow the expansion of an indoor rock climbing facility/gymnasium (d.b.a. Dogpatch Boulders), within a PDR-1-G (General) District and 68-X Height and Bulk District, and the Innovative Industries Special Use District. Planning Code Sections 249.37 and 843.45 require a Conditional Use authorization for retail businesses including personal service establishments, such as a health club, fitness, gymnasium or exercise facility, over 4,000 SF in area.  The project proposes a 5,000 SF expansion of the existing rock climbing facility/gymnasium from 17,500 SF to 22,500 SF. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Preliminary Recommendation:  Approve with Conditions

 

 C.        COMMISSION MATTERS

 

5.             Consideration of Adoption:

·         Draft Minutes for November 6, 2014

 

6.             Commission Comments/Questions

·         Inquiries/Announcements.  Without discussion, at this time Commissioners may make announcements or inquiries of staff regarding various matters of interest to the Commissioner(s).

·         Future Meetings/Agendas.  At this time, the Commission may discuss and take action to set the date of a Special Meeting and/or determine those items that could be placed on the agenda of the next meeting and other future meetings of the Planning Commission.

 

D.         DEPARTMENT MATTERS

 

7.             Director’s Announcements

               

8.             Review of Past Events at the Board of Supervisors, Board of Appeals and Historic Preservation Commission

               

E.         GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT – 15 MINUTES

 

At this time, members of the public may address the Commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda items.  With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting.  Each member of the public may address the Commission for up to three minutes.

 

F.            REGULAR CALENDAR 

 

The Commission Hearing Procedures provide for presentations by staff; followed by the project sponsor team; followed by public comment for and against the proposal.  Please be advised that the project sponsor team includes: the sponsor(s) or their designee, lawyers, architects, engineers, expediters, and/or other advisors.

 

9.                                                                                                                                           (K. CONNER: (415) 575-6914)

MAYOR’S HOUSING WORKING GROUP UPDATE – Informational Item.

Preliminary Recommendation:  None - Informational

 

10.          2011.0409B                                                                                                          (K. GUY: (415) 558-6163)

925 MISSION STREET – (“5M Project”) Informational Item – (Assessor Block 3725/Lots: 005, 006, 008, 009, 012, 042, 043, 044, 045, 046, 047, 076, 077, 086, 089, 090, 091, 093, 097, 098; air rights parcels 094, 099, and 100). The 5M project entails construction of four new buildings ranging in height from approximately 180 feet up to approximately 470 feet on a four-acre site at 925 Street (et.al) in the South of Market (SoMa) neighborhood. The project also proposes an elevated, multi-story connector between two of the buildings that would span a portion of Natoma Street. In total, the project would entail construction of 1.8 million square feet of office, retail, residential, cultural, educational, and open space uses.

Preliminary Recommendation:  None - Informational

 

11.          2011.0409E                                                                                                (M. Jacinto: (415) 575-9033)

925 MISSION STREET – (“5M Project”) - Public Hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report – (Assessor Block 3725/Lots: 005, 006, 008, 009, 012, 042, 043, 044, 045, 046, 047, 076, 077, 086, 089, 090, 091, 093, 097, 098; air rights parcels 094, 099, and 100). The 5M project entails construction of four new buildings ranging in height from approximately 180 feet up to approximately 470 feet on a four-acre site at 925 Street (et.al) in the South of Market (SoMa) neighborhood. The project also proposes an elevated, multi-story connector between two of the buildings that would span a portion of Natoma Street. In total, the project would entail construction of 1.8 million square feet of office, retail, residential, cultural, educational, and open space uses. The project would result in retention and renovation/rehabilitation of the Chronicle Building (901-933 Mission St.) and 447-449 Minna St.; would entail demolition of a building at 430 Natoma St. (an historic resource); as well as five existing buildings found through EIR evaluation as ineligible for listing on the California Register: 910 Howard, 912 Howard, 924–926 Howard St.; 110 Fifth and 190 Fifth St. The project site is located in the C-3-S [Downtown Support] and RSD [Residential Service] zoning districts and 90-X and 40-X height and bulk districts. The project requires General Plan, Planning Code, and Zoning Map text amendments as well as adoption of a Special Use District (SUD) to permit the project’s uses at the heights and land use intensities proposed.

NOTE: Written comments on the DEIR will be accepted at the Planning Department until 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2014.

 

 

12.          2013.0647T                                                                                                      (A. STARR: (415) 558-6362)

PLANNING CODE AMENDMENTS RELATED TO Consolidating Definitions, Reorganize Article 2, and Make Other Nonsubstantive Changes to Update, Clarify, and Simplify Code Language - Planning Code Amendment to consolidate definitions into Section 102, reorganize Article 2 to create Zoning Control Tables, and make non-substantive changes to various sections in Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 in order to update, clarify, and simplify Code language; affirming the Planning Department’s California Environmental Quality Act determination and making findings of consistency with the General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1.

Preliminary Recommendation: Adopt a Recommendation for Approval with Modifications

(Continued from Regular Meeting of October 23, 2014)

NOTE: On October 23, 2014, after Hearing and Closing Public Comment, the Commission Continued the item to November 20, 2014 by a vote of +4 -2 (Johnson, Fong against; Moore absent).

 

13.          2013.1517ME                                                                                                    (J. SWAE: (415) 575-9069)

URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN (PHASE 1: STREET TREES) - Consideration of adoption of General Plan Amendment.  Staff will request the Commission to consider approving a Resolution amending the San Francisco General Plan (Recreation & Open Space Element), pursuant to San Francisco Charter Section 4.105, Planning Code § 340(c) and § 306.3,  to adopt the San Francisco Urban Forest Plan Master Plan (Phase 1: Street Trees) by reference. The Urban Forest Plan (Phase 1: Street Trees) includes policies and strategies to proactively manage and grow the city’s street tree population.

Preliminary Recommendation:  Adopt

(Continued from Regular Meeting of November 6, 2014)

NOTE: On November 6, 2014, after Hearing and Closing Public Comment, the Commission Continued the item to November 20, 2014 by a vote of +5 -2 (Hillis, Fong against).

 

14.          2014.0156T                                                                                                  (M. MOHAN: (415) 575-9141)

REASONABLE MODIFICATION LEGISLATION - REASONABLE MODIFICATION TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES SEEKING FAIR ACCESS TO HOUSING - Planning Code Amendment to establish a process for making and acting upon requests for reasonable modifications for Persons with Disabilities to seek fair housing - The process will be established under Planning Code Section 305 under two procedures. The first procedure will be considered under an administrative variance procedure for ramps, parking without a structure, elevators, and habitable space within the permitted building envelope. All other requests will proceed under the standard variance procedure. Applicants will be required to provide grounds for the modification as well as documentation describing why the modification is necessary.

Preliminary Recommendation: Adopt a Recommendation for Approval

(Continued from Regular Meeting of November 6, 2014)

 

15a.        2013.0986CX                                                                                                   (R. SUCRE: (415) 575-9108)

1140 FOLSOM STREET - located at the northeast corner of Folsom and Rausch Streets, Lots 015, 075, 077, 078  and 080 in Assessor’s Block 3730 - Request for a Conditional Use Authorization and Planned Unit Development (PUD), pursuant to Planning Code Sections 121.1, 121.7, 303 and 304, for the new construction of a four-to-six-story, mixed-use building (approximately 153,675 gsf) with 112 dwelling units, ground floor corner retail (approximately 5,600 sq ft), 88 off-street parking spaces, 104 Class 1 bicycle parking spaces, 8 Class 2 bicycle parking spaces, and private and common open space. Per Planning Code Sections 121.1 and 121.7, the project is required to obtain Conditional Use Authorization for development on a lot greater than 10,000 square feet within the Folsom Street NCT Zoning District, and for the merger of lots, which would create more than 50-ft of street frontage within the RED Zoning District. Under the PUD, the project is seeking modification to certain Planning Code requirements, including: 1) rear yard (Planning Code Section 134); 2) open space (Planning Code Section 135); 3) dwelling unit exposure (Planning Code Section 140); 4) off-street parking (Planning Code Section 151.1); and, 5) off-street loading (Planning Code Section 152.1). The subject property is located within the Folsom St NCT (Neighborhood Commercial Transit) and Residential Enclave (RED) Zoning Districts, and 40-X/65-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Preliminary Recommendation: Approve with Conditions

 

15b.        2013.0986CX                                                                                                      (R. SUCRE: 415/575-9108)

1140 FOLSOM STREET -  located at the northeast corner of Folsom and Rausch Streets, Lots 015, 075, 077, 078 and 080 in Assessor’s Block 3730 - Request for a Large Project Authorization, pursuant to Planning Code Section 329, for the new construction of a four-to-six-story, mixed-use building (approximately 153,675 gsf) with 112 dwelling units, ground floor corner retail (approximately 5,600 sq ft), 88 off-street parking spaces, 104 Class 1 bicycle parking spaces, 8 Class 2 bicycle parking spaces, and private and common open space. Under the LPA, the project is seeking a modification to certain Planning Code requirements, including: 1) rear yard (Planning Code Section 134); 2) open space (Planning Code Section 135); 3) dwelling unit exposure (Planning Code Section 140); 4) off-street parking (Planning Code Section 151.1); 5) off-street loading (Planning Code Section 152.1); and, 6) horizontal mass reduction (Planning Code Section 270.1). These modifications are similar to the modifications sought under the PUD. The subject property is located within the Folsom St NCT (Neighborhood Commercial Transit) and Residential Enclave (RED) Zoning Districts, and 40-X/65-X Height and Bulk District.

Preliminary Recommendation: Approve with Conditions

 

16.          2014.0799C                                                                                                  (L. AJELLO:  (415) 575-9142)

3600 GEARY BLVD - northwest corner of Palm Avenue; Lot 018 in Assessor’s Block 1061 - Request for Conditional Use Authorization, pursuant to Planning Code Sections 303(c), 303(i), 307(i), 703.4 and 712.40 to establish a Formula Retail pharmacy store (d.b.a CVS Pharmacy) within a NC-3 (Moderate-Scale Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District and 80-A Height and Bulk District.  This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Preliminary Recommendation:  Approve with Conditions

                                (Continued from Regular Meeting of November 6, 2014)

 

G.            DISCRETIONARY REVIEW CALENDAR 

 

The Commission Discretionary Review Hearing Procedures provide for presentations by staff; followed by the DR requestor team; followed by public comment opposed to the project; followed by the project sponsor team; followed by public comment in support of the project.  Please be advised that the DR requestor and project sponsor teams include: the DR requestor and sponsor or their designee, lawyers, architects, engineers, expediters, and/or other advisors.

 

17.          2014.1379D                                                                                                    (L. AJELLO: (415) 575-9142)

2985 LAKE STREET - west side between El Camino Del Mar and 30^th Avenue; Lot 002 in Assessor’s Block 1327 - Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2014.04.01.2150 proposing to construct a 2^nd story addition above the existing attached garage and a 2-story addition on the south side of the building located within a RH-1(D) (Residential House, One-Family, Detached) District and 40-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Staff Analysis: Abbreviated Discretionary Review

Preliminary Recommendation: Do Not Take Discretionary Review and Approve

 

18.          2014.0177D                                                                                                    (T. CHANG: (415) 575-9197)

53 STATES STREET - south side of States Street between Castro and Douglass Streets; Lot 074 in Assessor’s Block 6623 - Mandatory Discretionary Review, pursuant to Planning Code Section 317, to demolish an existing single-family dwelling unit to construct a new four-story, two-family dwelling within a RH-2 (Residential, Home, Two-Family) Zoning District and 40-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Preliminary Recommendation:  Do Not Take Discretionary Review and Approve

(Continued from Regular Meeting of October 2, 2014)

 

H.            PUBLIC COMMENT

 

At this time, members of the public may address the Commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda items.  With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception.  When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Commission has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Commission must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the Calendar.  Each member of the public may address the Commission for up to three minutes.

 

The Brown Act forbids a commission from taking action or discussing any item not appearing on the posted agenda, including those items raised at public comment.  In response to public comment, the commission is limited to:

 

(1)  responding to statements made or questions posed by members of the public; or

(2)  requesting staff to report back on a matter at a subsequent meeting; or

(3)  directing staff to place the item on a future agenda.  (Government Code Section 54954.2(a))

 

Adjournment

Hearing Procedures

The Planning Commission holds public hearings regularly, on most Thursdays. The full hearing schedule for the calendar year and the Commission Rules & Regulations may be found online at: www.sfplanning.org.

 

Public Comments: Persons attending a hearing may comment on any scheduled item.

v  When speaking before the Commission in City Hall, Room 400, please note the timer indicating how much time remains.  Speakers will hear two alarms.  The first soft sound indicates the speaker has 30 seconds remaining.  The second louder sound indicates that the speaker’s opportunity to address the Commission has ended.

 

Sound-Producing Devices Prohibited: The ringing of and use of mobile phones and other sound-producing electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting. Please be advised that the Chair may order the removal of any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of a mobile phone, pager, or other similar sound-producing electronic devices (67A.1 Sunshine Ordinance: Prohibiting the use of cell phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices at and during public meetings).

 

For most cases (CU’s, PUD’s, 309’s, etc…) that are considered by the Planning Commission, after being introduced by the Commission Secretary, shall be considered by the Commission in the following order:

 

1. A thorough description of the issue(s) by the Director or a member of the staff.
2. A presentation of the proposal by the Project Sponsor(s) team (includes sponsor or their designee, lawyers, architects, engineers, expediters, and/or other advisors) would be for a period not to exceed 10 minutes, unless a written request for extension not to exceed a total presentation time of 15 minutes is received at least 72 hours in advance of the hearing, through the Commission Secretary, and granted by the President or Chair.
3. A presentation of opposition to the proposal by organized opposition for a period not to exceed 10 minutes (or a period equal to that provided to the project sponsor team) with a minimum of three (3) speakers.  The intent of the 10 min block of time provided to organized opposition is to reduce the number of overall speakers who are part of the organized opposition.  The requestor should advise the group that the Commission would expect the organized presentation to represent their testimony, if granted.  Organized opposition will be recognized only upon written application at least 72 hours in advance of the hearing, through the Commission Secretary, the President or Chair.  Such application should identify the organization(s) and speakers.
4. Public testimony from proponents of the proposal:  An individual may speak for a period not to exceed three (3) minutes.
5. Public testimony from opponents of the proposal:  An individual may speak for a period not to exceed three (3) minutes.
6. Director’s preliminary recommendation must be prepared in writing.
7. Action by the Commission on the matter before it.
8. In public hearings on Draft Environmental Impact Reports, all speakers will be limited to a period not to exceed three (3) minutes.

9.        The President (or Acting Chair) may impose time limits on appearances by members of the public and may otherwise exercise his or her discretion on procedures for the conduct of public hearings.

10.     Public comment portion of the hearing shall be closed and deliberation amongst the Commissioners shall be opened by the Chair;

11.     A motion to approve; approve with conditions; approve with amendments and/or modifications; disapprove; or continue to another hearing date, if seconded, shall be voted on by the Commission.

 

Every Official Act taken by the Commission must be adopted by a majority vote of all members of the Commission, a minimum of four (4) votes.  A failed motion results in the disapproval of the requested action, unless a subsequent motion is adopted. Any Procedural Matter, such as a continuance, may be adopted by a majority vote of members present, as long as the members present constitute a quorum (four (4) members of the Commission).

 

For Discretionary Review cases that are considered by the Planning Commission, after being introduced by the Commission Secretary, shall be considered by the Commission in the following order:

 

1.        A thorough description of the issue by the Director or a member of the staff.

2.        A presentation by the DR Requestor(s) team (includes Requestor(s) or their designee, lawyers, architects, engineers, expediters, and/or other advisors) would be for a period not to exceed five (5) minutes for each requestor.

3.        Testimony by members of the public in support of the DR would be up to three (3) minutes each.

4.        A presentation by the Project Sponsor(s) team (includes Sponsor(s) or their designee, lawyers, architects, engineers, expediters, and/or other advisors) would be for a period up to five (5) minutes, but could be extended for a period not to exceed 10 minutes if there are multiple DR requestors.

5.        Testimony by members of the public in support of the project would be up to three (3) minutes each.

6. DR requestor(s) or their designees are given two (2) minutes for rebuttal.

7.        Project sponsor(s) or their designees are given two (2) minutes for rebuttal.

8.        The President (or Acting Chair) may impose time limits on appearances by members of the public and may otherwise exercise his or her discretion on procedures for the conduct of public hearings.

 

The Commission must Take DR in order to disapprove or modify a building permit application that is before them under Discretionary Review.  A failed motion to Take DR results in a Project that is approved as proposed.

 

Hearing Materials

Advance Submissions: To allow Commissioners the opportunity to review material in advance of a hearing, materials must be received by the Planning Department eight (8) days prior to the scheduled public hearing.  All submission packages must be delivered to1650 Mission Street, Suite 400, by 5:00 p.m. and should include fifteen (15) hardcopies and a .pdf copy must be provided to the staff planner. Correspondence submitted to the Planning Commission after eight days in advance of a hearing must be received by the Commission Secretary no later than the close of business the day before a hearing for it to become a part of the public record for any public hearing.

 

Correspondence submitted to the Planning Commission on the same day, must be submitted at the hearing directly to the Planning Commission Secretary. Please provide ten (10) copies for distribution. Correspondence submitted in any other fashion on the same day may not become a part of the public record until the following hearing.

 

Correspondence sent directly to all members of the Commission, must include a copy to the Commission Secretary (commissions.secretary@sfgov.org) for it to become a part of the public record.

 

These submittal rules and deadlines shall be strictly enforced and no exceptions shall be made without a vote of the Commission.

 

Persons unable to attend a hearing may submit written comments regarding a scheduled item to: Planning Commission, 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA  94103-2414.  Written comments received by the close of the business day prior to the hearing will be brought to the attention of the Planning Commission and made part of the official record. 

 

Appeals

The following is a summary of appeal rights associated with the various actions that may be taken at a Planning Commission hearing.

 

Case Type	Case Suffix	Appeal Period*	Appeal Body
Office Allocation	B	15 calendar days	Board of Appeals**
Conditional Use Authorization and Planned Unit Development	C	30 calendar days	Board of Supervisors
Building Permit Application (Discretionary Review)	D	15 calendar days	Board of Appeals
EIR Certification	E	30 calendar days	Board of Supervisors
Coastal Zone Permit	P	15 calendar days	Board of Appeals
Planning Code Amendments by Application	T	30 calendar days	Board of Supervisors
Variance (Zoning Administrator action)	V	10 calendar days	Board of Appeals
Permit Review in C-3 Districts, Downtown Residential Districts and Large Project Authorization in Eastern Neighborhoods	X	15 calendar days	Board of Appeals
Zoning Map Change by Application	Z	30 calendar days	Board of Supervisors

 

* Appeals of Planning Commission decisions on Building Permit Applications (Discretionary Review) must be made within 15 days of the date the building permit is issued/denied by the Department of Building Inspection (not from the date of the Planning Commission hearing).  Appeals of Zoning Administrator decisions on Variances must be made within 10 days from the issuance of the decision letter.

 

**An appeal of a Certificate of Appropriateness or Permit to Alter/Demolish may be made to the Board of Supervisors if the project requires Board of Supervisors approval or if the project is associated with a Conditional Use Authorization appeal.  An appeal of an Office Allocation may be made to the Board of Supervisors if the project requires a Conditional Use Authorization.

 

For more information regarding the Board of Appeals process, please contact the Board of Appeals at (415) 575-6880.  For more information regarding the Board of Supervisors process, please contact the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at (415) 554-5184 or board.of.supervisors@sfgov.org.

 

Challenges

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, if you challenge, in court, (1) the adoption or amendment of a general plan, (2) the adoption or amendment of a zoning ordinance, (3) the adoption or amendment of any regulation attached to a specific plan, (4) the adoption, amendment or modification of a development agreement, or (5) the approval of a variance, conditional-use authorization, or any permit, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at, or prior to, the public hearing.

 

CEQA Appeal Rights under Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code

If the Commission’s action on a project constitutes the Approval Action for that project (as defined in S.F. Administrative Code Chapter 31, as amended, Board of Supervisors Ordinance Number 161-13), then the CEQA determination prepared in support of that Approval Action is thereafter subject to appeal within the time frame specified in S.F. Administrative Code Section 31.16.  This appeal is separate from and in addition to an appeal of an action on a project.  Typically, an appeal must be filed within 30 calendar days of the Approval Action for a project that has received an exemption or negative declaration pursuant to CEQA.  For information on filing an appeal under Chapter 31, contact the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco, CA 94102, or call (415) 554-5184.  If the Department’s Environmental Review Officer has deemed a project to be exempt from further environmental review, an exemption determination has been prepared and can be obtained on-line at http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=3447. Under CEQA, in a later court challenge, a litigant may be limited to raising only those issues previously raised at a hearing on the project or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission, Planning Department or other City board, commission or department at, or prior to, such hearing, or as part of the appeal hearing process on the CEQA decision.

 

Protest of Fee or Exaction

You may protest any fee or exaction subject to Government Code Section 66000 imposed as a condition of approval in accordance with Government Code Section 66020.  The protest must satisfy the requirements of Government Code Section 66020(a) and must be filed within 90 days of the date of the first approval or conditional approval of the development referencing the challenged fee or exaction.  For purposes of Government Code Section 66020, the date of imposition of the fee shall be the date of the earliest discretionary approval by the City of the subject development.  

 

The Planning Commission’s approval or conditional approval of the development subject to the challenged fee or exaction as expressed in its Motion, Resolution, or Discretionary Review Action or the Zoning Administrator’s Variance Decision Letter will serve as Notice that the 90-day protest period under Government Code Section 66020 has begun.