November 13, 2014

ROLL CALL:                                                                         

                                            President:                                Cindy Wu

                                            Vice-President:                      Rodney Fong

                                            Commissioners:                    Michael J. Antonini; Rich Hillis; Christine Johnson

                                                                                                Kathrin Moore; Dennis Richards

 

A.            CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS PROPOSED FOR CONTINUANCE

 

The Commission will consider a request for continuance to a later date.  The Commission may choose to continue the item to the date proposed below, to continue the item to another date, or to hear the item on this calendar.

 

B.         CONSENT CALENDAR

 

All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission, and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Commission.  There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the Commission, the public, or staff so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing

 

1.                   2014.0977C                                                                                         (M. BOUDREAUX: (415) 575-9140)

2312 MARKET STREET - southwest corner 16^th Street; Lot 001 in Assessor’s Block 3562 - Request for Conditional Use Authorization, pursuant to Planning Code Section 303 to modify existing conditions of Motion No. 14434 (case no. 1997.366C) to remove conditions #2 and #4, to operate during the same business hours as the rest of the zoning district and to serve any cuisine type. No other work is proposed. The site is within the Upper Market Neighborhood Commercial Transit (NCT) Zoning District, and 50-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Preliminary Recommendation:  Approve

                        (Continued from Regular Meeting of October 23, 2014)

 

2.                   2014.1038Q                                                                                                  (A. PERRY: (415) 575-9017) 3322 16^TH STREET - north side of 16^th Street between Dolores Street and Landers Street on Assessor’s Block 3557, Lot 013 - Request for Condominium Conversion Subdivision to convert a three-story-over-garage, six-unit building within a RTO (Residential Transit Oriented), 40-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.                

Preliminary Recommendation:  Approve

 

3.                   2014.0165C                                                                                                            (S. LAI:  (415) 575-9087)

1661 PINE STREET - south side of Pine Street and north side of Austin Street, between Van Ness Avenue and Franklin Street; Lot 030 in Assessor’s Block 0666 - Request for Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Planning Code Sections 243, 253, 303 and 304 to modify the existing residential care facility (San Francisco Towers) and Planned Unit Development (PUD) including addition of habitable area, reduction of parking, change of use, resulting in the  modification of the conditions of approval under Case No. 1989.037C, within the RC-4 (Residential-Commercial Combined, High Density) and NC-3 Zoning Districts, the Van Ness Special Use District, the Van Ness Automotive Special Use District and the 130-E Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Preliminary Recommendation:   Approve with Conditions

 

C.         COMMISSION MATTERS

 

4.             Consideration of Adoption:

·         Draft Minutes for October 23, 2014

 

5.             Commission Comments/Questions

·         Inquiries/Announcements.  Without discussion, at this time Commissioners may make announcements or inquiries of staff regarding various matters of interest to the Commissioner(s).

·         Future Meetings/Agendas.  At this time, the Commission may discuss and take action to set the date of a Special Meeting and/or determine those items that could be placed on the agenda of the next meeting and other future meetings of the Planning Commission.

 

6.             Commission Action Prioritization

 

D.         DEPARTMENT MATTERS

 

7.             Director’s Announcements

               

8.             Review of Past Events at the Board of Supervisors, Board of Appeals and Historic Preservation Commission

               

E.         GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT – 15 MINUTES

 

At this time, members of the public may address the Commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda items.  With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting.  Each member of the public may address the Commission for up to three minutes.

 

F.            REGULAR CALENDAR 

 

The Commission Hearing Procedures provide for presentations by staff; followed by the project sponsor team; followed by public comment for and against the proposal.  Please be advised that the project sponsor team includes: the sponsor(s) or their designee, lawyers, architects, engineers, expediters, and/or other advisors.

 

9.                                                                                                                                (D. SOKOLOVE: (415) 575-9112)

FOOD AND BEVERAGE CLUSTER REPORT – Informational presentation on the City’s food and beverage manufacturing and distribution sectors, “Makers & Movers Economic Cluster Strategy.”

Preliminary Recommendation:  None - Informational

 

10.          2014.1167T                                                                                                      (K. BURNS: (415) 575-9112)

PLANNING CODE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW EXEMPTIONS ABOVE THE HEIGHT LIMIT FOR HOSPITAL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT – Planning Code Amendment to allow exemptions above the height limit in Code Section 260 for hospital mechanical equipment so long as it is 1) not higher than the highest point of the existing rooftop enclosure; 2) has minimal visual impact and maximum architectural integration; 3) is necessary for the function of the building; and 4) no other feasible alternatives exist; making environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1.

Preliminary Recommendation:  Adopt a Recommendation for Approval

 

11a.        2013.1601XV                                                                                                  (K. BURNS: (415) 575-9112)

690 MARKET STREET - Northeast corner of the intersection of Market Street, Geary Street and Kearny Street; Lots 016-019 in Assessor’s Block 0311 - Request for Downtown Project Authorization to amend the conditions of approval for a previously-approved project to construct an eight-story vertical addition and change the use from office to residential and time-share hotel units to provide 106 residential and hotel units (Case No. 2004.0584EKXCMTZLU). Pursuant to the requirements of Section 134, the minimum required rear yard depth shall be equal to 25% of the total lot depth at the lowest story containing a dwelling unit and at each succeeding level or story of the building. The Project Sponsor proposes to amend the conditions of approval for the previous Downtown Project Authorization to convert 24 vacant timeshare hotel units into dwelling units within a building with full lot coverage that is unable to provide the 25% required rear yard. The project site is located within a C-3-O (Downtown Office) Zoning District and 285-S Height and Bulk District.  This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Preliminary Recommendation: Approve with Conditions

 

11b.        2013.1601XV                                                                                                    (K. BURNS: (415) 575-9112)

690 MARKET STREET - northeast corner of the intersection of Market Street, Geary Street and Kearny Street; Lots 016-019 in Assessor’s Block 0311 - Request for Variances pursuant to Planning Code Section 305, 135 and 140 to provide less residential open space than is required by the Planning Code and provide one dwelling unit in the subject building that does not meet the exposure requirements. The proposed project is to amend conditions of approval for the previous Downtown Project Authorization to convert 24 vacant timeshare hotel units into dwelling unit with a building with full lot coverage (Previous Case No. 2004.0584EKXCMTZLU). The project site is located within a C-3-O (Downtown Office) Zoning District and 285-S Height and Bulk District.

 

12.          2011.1388X                                                                                               (P. LAVALLEY: (415) 575-9084)

110 THE EMBARCADERO/115 STEUART STREET - midblock between Mission and Howard Streets; Lot 002 in Assessor’s Block 3715 - Request for Downtown Project Authorization Hearing of a proposed Administrative approval of Building Permit Application No. 2013.12.17.4360 pursuant to Planning Code Sections 309(d) and (g). The proposed project consists of: 1) vertical addition of a third story, roof deck, and circulation penthouse to the existing two-story-over basement building; 2) replacement of the Embarcadero façade and restoration of the Steuart Street facade; and 3) rehabilitation of the building for office and assembly use for the Commonwealth Club of California. The proposed project is not seeking any Planning Code exceptions and the Department is not recommending any modifications to the project design. The project site is located within the C-3-O (Downtown Office) Zoning District and 84-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Preliminary Recommendation:   Approve with Conditions

 

G.            DISCRETIONARY REVIEW CALENDAR 

 

The Commission Discretionary Review Hearing Procedures provide for presentations by staff; followed by the DR requestor team; followed by public comment opposed to the project; followed by the project sponsor team; followed by public comment in support of the project.  Please be advised that the DR requestor and project sponsor teams include: the DR requestor and sponsor or their designee, lawyers, architects, engineers, expediters, and/or other advisors.

 

13.          2014.0676D                                                                                                    (S. VELLVE: (415) 558-6263)

228 17^TH AVENUE – east side between California and Clement Streets; Lot 029 in Assessor’s Block 1417 -  Mandatory Discretionary Review, pursuant to Planning Code Section 317(d), of Demolition Permit Application No. 2014.05.06.5004 and New Construction Permit Application No. 2014.05.06.5011 proposing to demolish a one-story, one-unit building with detached one-car garage and construct a four-story, two-unit building with four off-street parking spaces within a RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) Zoning District and 40-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Staff Analysis: Full Discretionary Review

Preliminary Recommendation: Do Not Take Discretionary Review and Approve

 

14.          2012.0909D                                                                                           (C. LAMORENA: (415) 575-9085)

690 PAGE STREET - northeast corner at Steiner and Page Streets; Lot 016 in Assessor’s Block 0843 - Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application Nos. 2013.05.21.7455, 2013.05.21.7457, 2013.05.21.7462, 2013.05.21.7463, and 013.05.217464, proposing to demolish an existing one-story building and surface parking lot and construct four residential buildings with three dwelling units each, totaling 12 dwelling units within a RM-1 (Residential, Mixed, Low-Density) Zoning District and 40-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Staff Analysis:  Full Discretionary Review

Preliminary Recommendation:  Do Not Take Discretionary Review and Approve

 

15.          2014.0553DD                                                                                                (L. AJELLO: (415) 575-9142)

3768-3770 FILLMORE STREET - east side between Marina Boulevard and Jefferson Street; Lot 038 in Assessor’s Block 0436C - Requests for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2014.03.19.1107 proposing to construct a fourth floor addition and two third-story roof decks above a three-story three-unit building located within a RH-2 (Residential House, Two-Family) District and 40-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Staff Analysis: Abbreviated Discretionary Review

Preliminary Recommendation: Do Not Take Discretionary Review and Approve

 

16.          2013.1590D                                                                                                      (E.TUFFY: (415) 575-9191)

461 27^th STREET - south side between Noe and Sanchez streets; Lot 033 in Assessor’s Block 6591 - Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2013.11.21.2535 proposing expansion of the existing single family residence. The project involves raising the existing building 18 inches to add a garage and a full-height lower level, constructing a new dormer on the west roof slope, repairs and replacement-in-kind of exterior wood elements on the cottage, and construction of a new, 3-story addition with a roof deck at the rear of the existing structure. The subject property is located within a RH-2 (Residential House, Two-Family) District and 40-X Height and Bulk District. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code.

Staff Analysis: Abbreviated Discretionary Review

Preliminary Recommendation: Do Not Take Discretionary Review and Approve

 

H.            PUBLIC COMMENT

 

At this time, members of the public may address the Commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda items.  With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception.  When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Commission has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Commission must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the Calendar.  Each member of the public may address the Commission for up to three minutes.

 

The Brown Act forbids a commission from taking action or discussing any item not appearing on the posted agenda, including those items raised at public comment.  In response to public comment, the commission is limited to:

 

(1)  responding to statements made or questions posed by members of the public; or

(2)  requesting staff to report back on a matter at a subsequent meeting; or

(3)  directing staff to place the item on a future agenda.  (Government Code Section 54954.2(a))

 

Adjournment

Hearing Procedures

The Planning Commission holds public hearings regularly, on most Thursdays. The full hearing schedule for the calendar year and the Commission Rules & Regulations may be found online at: www.sfplanning.org.

 

Public Comments: Persons attending a hearing may comment on any scheduled item.

v  When speaking before the Commission in City Hall, Room 400, please note the timer indicating how much time remains.  Speakers will hear two alarms.  The first soft sound indicates the speaker has 30 seconds remaining.  The second louder sound indicates that the speaker’s opportunity to address the Commission has ended.

 

Sound-Producing Devices Prohibited: The ringing of and use of mobile phones and other sound-producing electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting. Please be advised that the Chair may order the removal of any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of a mobile phone, pager, or other similar sound-producing electronic devices (67A.1 Sunshine Ordinance: Prohibiting the use of cell phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices at and during public meetings).

 

For most cases (CU’s, PUD’s, 309’s, etc…) that are considered by the Planning Commission, after being introduced by the Commission Secretary, shall be considered by the Commission in the following order:

 

1. A thorough description of the issue(s) by the Director or a member of the staff.
2. A presentation of the proposal by the Project Sponsor(s) team (includes sponsor or their designee, lawyers, architects, engineers, expediters, and/or other advisors) would be for a period not to exceed 10 minutes, unless a written request for extension not to exceed a total presentation time of 15 minutes is received at least 72 hours in advance of the hearing, through the Commission Secretary, and granted by the President or Chair.
3. A presentation of opposition to the proposal by organized opposition for a period not to exceed 10 minutes (or a period equal to that provided to the project sponsor team) with a minimum of three (3) speakers.  The intent of the 10 min block of time provided to organized opposition is to reduce the number of overall speakers who are part of the organized opposition.  The requestor should advise the group that the Commission would expect the organized presentation to represent their testimony, if granted.  Organized opposition will be recognized only upon written application at least 72 hours in advance of the hearing, through the Commission Secretary, the President or Chair.  Such application should identify the organization(s) and speakers.
4. Public testimony from proponents of the proposal:  An individual may speak for a period not to exceed three (3) minutes.
5. Public testimony from opponents of the proposal:  An individual may speak for a period not to exceed three (3) minutes.
6. Director’s preliminary recommendation must be prepared in writing.
7. Action by the Commission on the matter before it.
8. In public hearings on Draft Environmental Impact Reports, all speakers will be limited to a period not to exceed three (3) minutes.

9.        The President (or Acting Chair) may impose time limits on appearances by members of the public and may otherwise exercise his or her discretion on procedures for the conduct of public hearings.

10.     Public comment portion of the hearing shall be closed and deliberation amongst the Commissioners shall be opened by the Chair;

11.     A motion to approve; approve with conditions; approve with amendments and/or modifications; disapprove; or continue to another hearing date, if seconded, shall be voted on by the Commission.

 

Every Official Act taken by the Commission must be adopted by a majority vote of all members of the Commission, a minimum of four (4) votes.  A failed motion results in the disapproval of the requested action, unless a subsequent motion is adopted. Any Procedural Matter, such as a continuance, may be adopted by a majority vote of members present, as long as the members present constitute a quorum (four (4) members of the Commission).

 

For Discretionary Review cases that are considered by the Planning Commission, after being introduced by the Commission Secretary, shall be considered by the Commission in the following order:

 

1.        A thorough description of the issue by the Director or a member of the staff.

2.        A presentation by the DR Requestor(s) team (includes Requestor(s) or their designee, lawyers, architects, engineers, expediters, and/or other advisors) would be for a period not to exceed five (5) minutes for each requestor.

3.        Testimony by members of the public in support of the DR would be up to three (3) minutes each.

4.        A presentation by the Project Sponsor(s) team (includes Sponsor(s) or their designee, lawyers, architects, engineers, expediters, and/or other advisors) would be for a period up to five (5) minutes, but could be extended for a period not to exceed 10 minutes if there are multiple DR requestors.

5.        Testimony by members of the public in support of the project would be up to three (3) minutes each.

6. DR requestor(s) or their designees are given two (2) minutes for rebuttal.

7.        Project sponsor(s) or their designees are given two (2) minutes for rebuttal.

8.        The President (or Acting Chair) may impose time limits on appearances by members of the public and may otherwise exercise his or her discretion on procedures for the conduct of public hearings.

 

The Commission must Take DR in order to disapprove or modify a building permit application that is before them under Discretionary Review.  A failed motion to Take DR results in a Project that is approved as proposed.

 

Hearing Materials

Advance Submissions: To allow Commissioners the opportunity to review material in advance of a hearing, materials must be received by the Planning Department eight (8) days prior to the scheduled public hearing.  All submission packages must be delivered to1650 Mission Street, Suite 400, by 5:00 p.m. and should include fifteen (15) hardcopies and a .pdf copy must be provided to the staff planner. Correspondence submitted to the Planning Commission after eight days in advance of a hearing must be received by the Commission Secretary no later than the close of business the day before a hearing for it to become a part of the public record for any public hearing.

 

Correspondence submitted to the Planning Commission on the same day, must be submitted at the hearing directly to the Planning Commission Secretary. Please provide ten (10) copies for distribution. Correspondence submitted in any other fashion on the same day may not become a part of the public record until the following hearing.

 

Correspondence sent directly to all members of the Commission, must include a copy to the Commission Secretary (commissions.secretary@sfgov.org) for it to become a part of the public record.

 

These submittal rules and deadlines shall be strictly enforced and no exceptions shall be made without a vote of the Commission.

 

Persons unable to attend a hearing may submit written comments regarding a scheduled item to: Planning Commission, 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA  94103-2414.  Written comments received by the close of the business day prior to the hearing will be brought to the attention of the Planning Commission and made part of the official record. 

 

Appeals

The following is a summary of appeal rights associated with the various actions that may be taken at a Planning Commission hearing.

 

Case Type	Case Suffix	Appeal Period*	Appeal Body
Office Allocation	B	15 calendar days	Board of Appeals**
Conditional Use Authorization and Planned Unit Development	C	30 calendar days	Board of Supervisors
Building Permit Application (Discretionary Review)	D	15 calendar days	Board of Appeals
EIR Certification	E	30 calendar days	Board of Supervisors
Coastal Zone Permit	P	15 calendar days	Board of Appeals
Planning Code Amendments by Application	T	30 calendar days	Board of Supervisors
Variance (Zoning Administrator action)	V	10 calendar days	Board of Appeals
Permit Review in C-3 Districts, Downtown Residential Districts and Large Project Authorization in Eastern Neighborhoods	X	15 calendar days	Board of Appeals
Zoning Map Change by Application	Z	30 calendar days	Board of Supervisors

 

* Appeals of Planning Commission decisions on Building Permit Applications (Discretionary Review) must be made within 15 days of the date the building permit is issued/denied by the Department of Building Inspection (not from the date of the Planning Commission hearing).  Appeals of Zoning Administrator decisions on Variances must be made within 10 days from the issuance of the decision letter.

 

**An appeal of a Certificate of Appropriateness or Permit to Alter/Demolish may be made to the Board of Supervisors if the project requires Board of Supervisors approval or if the project is associated with a Conditional Use Authorization appeal.  An appeal of an Office Allocation may be made to the Board of Supervisors if the project requires a Conditional Use Authorization.

 

For more information regarding the Board of Appeals process, please contact the Board of Appeals at (415) 575-6880.  For more information regarding the Board of Supervisors process, please contact the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at (415) 554-5184 or board.of.supervisors@sfgov.org.

 

Challenges

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, if you challenge, in court, (1) the adoption or amendment of a general plan, (2) the adoption or amendment of a zoning ordinance, (3) the adoption or amendment of any regulation attached to a specific plan, (4) the adoption, amendment or modification of a development agreement, or (5) the approval of a variance, conditional-use authorization, or any permit, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at, or prior to, the public hearing.

 

CEQA Appeal Rights under Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code

If the Commission’s action on a project constitutes the Approval Action for that project (as defined in S.F. Administrative Code Chapter 31, as amended, Board of Supervisors Ordinance Number 161-13), then the CEQA determination prepared in support of that Approval Action is thereafter subject to appeal within the time frame specified in S.F. Administrative Code Section 31.16.  This appeal is separate from and in addition to an appeal of an action on a project.  Typically, an appeal must be filed within 30 calendar days of the Approval Action for a project that has received an exemption or negative declaration pursuant to CEQA.  For information on filing an appeal under Chapter 31, contact the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco, CA 94102, or call (415) 554-5184.  If the Department’s Environmental Review Officer has deemed a project to be exempt from further environmental review, an exemption determination has been prepared and can be obtained on-line at http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=3447. Under CEQA, in a later court challenge, a litigant may be limited to raising only those issues previously raised at a hearing on the project or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission, Planning Department or other City board, commission or department at, or prior to, such hearing, or as part of the appeal hearing process on the CEQA decision.

 

Protest of Fee or Exaction

You may protest any fee or exaction subject to Government Code Section 66000 imposed as a condition of approval in accordance with Government Code Section 66020.  The protest must satisfy the requirements of Government Code Section 66020(a) and must be filed within 90 days of the date of the first approval or conditional approval of the development referencing the challenged fee or exaction.  For purposes of Government Code Section 66020, the date of imposition of the fee shall be the date of the earliest discretionary approval by the City of the subject development.  

 

The Planning Commission’s approval or conditional approval of the development subject to the challenged fee or exaction as expressed in its Motion, Resolution, or Discretionary Review Action or the Zoning Administrator’s Variance Decision Letter will serve as Notice that the 90-day protest period under Government Code Section 66020 has begun.