New Page 1
SAN FRANCISCO
PLANNING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes
Commission Chambers - Room 400
City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
Thursday,
November 4, 2010
1:30 PM
Regular Meeting
COMMISSIONERS
PRESENT: Miguel, Olague, Antonini, Moore and Sugaya
COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: Borden
THE MEETING WAS
CALLED TO ORDER BY PRESIDENT MIGUEL AT 1:44 P.M.
STAFF IN
ATTENDANCE: John Rahaim – Director of Planning, David Lindsay, Bill Wycko,
Aaron Hollister, Adrian Putra, Devyani Jain, Elizabeth Watty, AnMarie Rodgers,
Brett Bollinger, Kevin Guy, Dan Sider, Steve Wertheim, Tara Sullivan, Joshua
Switzky, Mary Woods, and Linda Avery – Commission Secretary.
A.
CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS PROPOSED FOR CONTINUANCE
The Commission
will consider a request for continuance to a later date. The Commission may
choose to continue the item to the date proposed below, to continue the item to
another date, or to hear the item on this calendar.
1.
2010.0716C (A.
HOLLISTER: (415) 575-9078)
1556 STOCKTON STREET
- east
side between Union and Green Streets, Lot 054 in Assessor’s Block 0116 -
Request for Conditional Use Authorization to legitimize a Self-Service
Specialty Food establishment (DBA Tony’s A Go Go) that would also offer
pizza-making classes as a Personal Service use. The proposed business would
occupy approximately 900 gross square feet. No physical expansion of the
existing building is proposed. This site is within the North Beach Neighborhood
Commercial Use District, the North Beach Special Use District and a 40-X Height
and Bulk District
Preliminary
Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
(Proposed for
Continuance to December 9, 2010)
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: Continued to December 16, 2010
AYES:
Antonini, Moore, Sugaya, Olague and Miguel
ABSENT: Borden
B.
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Calendar, are considered to be
routine by the Planning Commission, and will be acted upon by a single roll call
vote of the Commission. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a member of the Commission, the public, or staff so requests, in which
event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered as a
separate item at this or a future hearing
2.
2009.0770C
(A. PUTRA: (415) 575-9079)
678 PORTOLA DRIVE
- north side between Woodside Avenue and Sydney, Lot 004 in Assessor’s
Block 2892 - Request for Conditional Use
Authorization, pursuant to Planning Code
Sections 209.6(c) and 303 to establish a new wireless telecommunication services
(WTS) facility by replacing three omni antennas with nine panel antennas to be
mounted and concealed within a church steeple, as part of the AT&T wireless
telecommunications network in a RH-1(D) (One-family, Residential, Detached)
Zoning District, and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: Approved
AYES:
Antonini, Moore, Sugaya, Olague and Miguel
ABSENT: Borden
MOTION: 18214
C.
COMMISSIONERS’ QUESTIONS AND MATTERS
Commission Comments/Questions
·
Inquiries/Announcements.
Without discussion, at this time Commissioners may make announcements or
inquiries of staff regarding various matters of interest to the Commissioner(s).
·
Future Meetings/Agendas.
At this time, the Commission may discuss and take action to set the date of a
Special Meeting and/or determine those items that could be placed on the agenda
of the next meeting and other future meetings of the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Miguel:
Rather than comment earlier, I thought I would save it for here, as to the
possibility of
an offsite meeting in December regarding Park Merced, there was comment from
Commissioners here that was affirmative in that regard. I've spoken with a
number of people from that area and organizations, as well as with the Mayor's
Office of Economic, and Work Force Development. I am sure we will hear from
later this afternoon as well on Park Merced
and the concept is that doing such a truthfully massive and extremely involved
project on
which we are going to -- and we will hear more in detail later
this afternoon, a number of informational hearings, was the thought that those
particular
matters regarding the project that are of most interest to the
residents, the tenants, and the general neighborhood, would best be heard there.
And so I have, actually, been working with Director Rahaim and with the Mayor's
Office, the Economic Work Force Development to determine which items would be
heard there, which ones would normally be heard here, any actual votes would be
done here, I know it's an unusual situation. Not that totally difficult to
accomplish and we will get more details, as we go along.
Commissioner Moore:
I support what you said. It's a very large community and we need to be out there
doing what we do. I was extremely proud to hear national television label us as
the most beautiful City in the country which we obviously all know. We all try
to contribute to keeping it that way, but it was wonderful to hear. I want to
commend the City on how well they organized the thing, that not a speck of
anything, orange, black, or whatever, when you walk across the big plaza down
the streets. it's remarkable with so many present that they organized it as well
as they did. It was fabulous to watch and I am happy the City was able to pull
it off that well.
On another note, I attended a meeting last night at the Southeast Community
Center, Candlestick Point state recreation area, the parks service presented
the plan. It was a number of people that come here that showed up. What I was
concerned about, and I am not speaking about the design and how it's being done,
but there's a slight disconnect bringing the Candlestick Hunter Point forward to
open space connections. The design as presented last night does not seem to be
fully on top of the knowledge and the breadth of what was done in that plan. I
hope there will be a meeting of minds for those two groups that come together
and work out where the marches need to occur. The other thing I want to talk
about is there are two items which were settled and off our calendar today,
those are items 12 and 14. And I want to comment on the weakness and short
comings of the drawings which accompanied both of these projects. I am
continuously dismayed and have been for many years that we are not encouraging
more consistent sets being submitted to us, relative to what is depicted and how
it is depicted. I would probably call these two drawings remotely sophomoric.
Perhaps my first year of architecture school, that's about where this is. For
this Commission that is not consistent or appropriate to render the type of
decisions we need to make and I want to help and empower the Department that
generally we are raising the bar of what is being expected as a minimum for
visual depiction in these applications. Sometimes we see window sill details and
foundation details which don't really matter. But what we really want to see is
how does it fit the context of the neighborhood, to how does it meet the
Department's guidelines to determine them. Three dimensional or whatever, but
these sets are way short of what the Department should be able to expect. Just
want to put that into the discussion and see if we can help, perhaps, develop a
set of criteria to help the Department.
Commissioner Antonini:
Like all of us thrilled with the Giants World Series Victory, particularly it
happened on Monday so we aren't sitting here biting our nails for the possible
seventh game today. I might have been there, but in any case, it was a thrill to
walk up the same steps today
that the Giants walked down on the entrance to City Hall and this does rekindle
our image as a City which we used to be known as 80 years ago. That has fallen
by the wayside recently, but the way it was handled yesterday, between the City,
the Giants, and the Project Sponsors, how well it was done.
On a smaller scale, but also I think of equal importance, today was the first
round of golf tournament out at Harding Park, which was the champions, and some
of the names that my age is more familiar with, Tom Watson and Fred couples are
among the participants out there. It's the second major tournament in two years
there will be another, and I would like to acknowledge the former and present
supervisor who were instrumental in refurbishing Harding Park and making it
great for local golfers and world champions alike. I am optimistic we can do the
same thing in the future with our other capital assets, and improve them and
bring them back to their former greatness so a good step in the right direction,
thank you.
Commissioner Sugaya:
I am going to wear former Commissioner Bill Lee's hat for a moment. The Traveler
Magazine has named San Francisco the most favorite City for travel in the U.S.,
so -- and I just wanted to comment on Commissioner Moore's Candlestick Park. I
am sure they are going to have a lot of time to come to a meeting of the minds
given the State budget and the failure of prop 21.
D. DIRECTOR’S REPORT
Director’s Announcements
None
Review of Past Week’s Events at the Board of Supervisors, Board of Appeals, and
Historic Preservation Commission.
Land Use:
101229 Marina
Branch Library Landmark Designation
(Sullivan/Frye)
101230 North
Beach Library Landmark Designation
(Sullivan/Frye)
100992 222 2nd Street
General Plan Amendment
(Guy)
100993 222 2nd Street
Zoning Map Amendment
(Guy)
101057 Health
Care Services Master Plan
(Watty/Rodgers/Rahaim)
FULL BOARD:
100829
Planning Code - Car-Share Controls
(Rodgers)
100046
Amending Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
(Sullivan)
RESULTS OF BOARD HEARINGS LAST WEEK:
Land Use:
100829
Planning Code - Car-Share Controls
(Rec. Approval)
100495 CEQA
Procedures and Appeals Reform-
(Cont to 11/15)
FULL BOARD:
100881 Zoning
Map Amendment - 1717-17th Street
(passed Final Read)
100917 Impact
Fee / Jobs-Housing Linkage Program Mods
(passed Final Read)
101200 TDR ;
Zoning Map and General Plan Map Amendments - 680 California Street
(passed Final Read)
LEGISLATION INTRODUCED:
101350 Supervisor Daly
Ordinance
amending the San Francisco Planning Code by amending Sections 151, 151.1, 155,
161, 249.1, 249.23, and Part VII of Article 9 (1) to remove minimum parking
requirements and establish maximum parking limits in M-1, C-M, and South of
Market districts and the Folsom and Main Residential/Commercial and Fourth and
Freelon Streets Special Use Districts to make them consistent with those of
neighboring districts, (2) to require that non-residential and non-hotel parking
in C-3 in the South of Market Mixed Use districts adjacent to Downtown maintain
a fee structure which discourages long-term commuter parking, (3) to make
parking controls in the Mission Bay Districts that are subject to the Planning
Code consistent with requirements of neighboring districts; and (4) adopting
findings, including environmental findings, Section 302 findings, and findings
of consistency with the General Plan and the Priority Policies of Planning Code
Section 101.1.
LEGISLATION NEARING EFFECTIVE DATE / NEWLY EFFECTIVE:
BF 100434 Castro NCD Restaurant Changes—Oct 15
BF 100851 Old St. Mary’s Part I—Nov 14
BF
100188 1800 Market St LGBT SUD—Nov 23
INTERIM CONTROLS:
Inclusionary
Housing Interim Controls—Resolution imposing interim zoning controls establishing a
requirement for conditional use authorization for a change in use or reduction
in size of any child care facility that serves more than 13 children, for an 18
month period. Expires 8/12/11 or Until Perm. Controls Est.
091209
Interim Zoning Controls for the Bayshore Corridor. CU for projects that involve: (1) formula retail; (2) new retail
25,000+ sf ; and/or (3) a lot merger of 25,000 sf+ in the Bayshore Corridor
vicinity. Expires 10/2/11.
100804
Interim Zoning - Requiring Conditional Use Authorization for Change in Use or
Reduction of Child Care Facilities
Effective 8/5/10. EXPIRES 2/5/12
3.
ERO Response to Questions Raised During Fairmont Tower FEIR
Certification Hearing – Informational
only.
SPEAKERS: Susan
Brant-Holly, Emil Lawrence, and Sue Hestor
ACTION: Following conflicting opinions of the action the Commission
took when it continued the item at its October 21, 2010 meeting, it was
determined that the Commission Secretary would transcribe the hearing and
determine the action of the Commission.
E.
GENERAL
PUBLIC COMMENT – 15 MINUTES
At this time,
members of the public may address the Commission on items of interest to the
public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission except
agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the
Commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each
member of the public may address the Commission for up to three minutes.
SPEAKERS: Sue Hestor regarding the DR on Lloyd
Street – the item was continued to 12.2.10, but she feels it will not be ready
on that date and the Commission might want to consider continuing it further
out.
F.
PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS WHERE THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED
At
this time, members of the public who wish to address the Commission on agenda
items that have already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of
the public were allowed to testify and the public hearing has been closed, must
do so at this time. Each member of the public may address the Commission for up
to three minutes.
SPEAKERS: Sam Montoya regarding item 4, 1645
Pacific Avenue – in opposition to certification of the Final EIR
G.
CONSIDERATION OF FINDINGS AND FINAL ACTION – PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
4.
2007.0519CEK
(B. BOLLINGER: (415)
575-9024)
1645 PACIFIC AVENUE - assessor’s
Block 0595 Lot 013 – Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report.
The project site is a 15,959-square-foot parcel located on a block bounded by
Pacific Ave., Polk St., Jackson St., and Van Ness Ave. in the Russian Hill
neighborhood. The proposed project would demolish the existing commercial
building and replace it with a new 65-foot high building with 48 residential
units, ground-level retail uses, and 49 parking spaces. The project site is
within the Polk Street Neighborhood Commercial District (Polk NCD) and 65-A
Height and Bulk District.
NOTE: The
public hearing on the Draft EIR is closed. The public comment period for the
Draft EIR ended on January 19, 2010. The Planning Commission does not conduct
public review of Final EIRs. Public comments on the certification may be
presented to the Planning Commission during the Public Comment portion of the
Commission calendar.
Preliminary Recommendation: Certify the Final EIR
(continued
from Regular Meeting of October 28, 2010)
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: Approved certification of the Final EIR
AYES:
Antonini, Moore, Sugaya, Olague and Miguel
ABSENT: Borden
RESOLUTION: 18215
H.
REGULAR CALENDAR
5.
2007.0519CEK
(K. GUY:
(415) 558-6163)
1645 PACIFIC
AVENUE
- south side between Polk Street and Van Ness Avenue; Lot 013 in Assessor’s
Block 0595 - Request for Conditional Use Authorization, pursuant to
Planning Code Sections 121.1, 271, and 303 to grant exceptions to bulk
requirements and to allow development of a lot larger than 10,000 square feet,
within the Polk Street Neighborhood Commercial District, and the 65-A Height and
Bulk District,
and the adoption of findings under the California Environmental Quality Act.
The proposed project is to demolish an existing building containing automotive
repair and parking uses and a portion of another automotive repair building, and
to construct a new six-story over basement building containing approximately 39
dwelling units, 40 off-street parking spaces, and approximately 3,200 square
feet of ground-floor commercial uses.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
(continued
from Regular Meeting of October 28, 2010)
SPEAKERS: In support: Steve Vettel – representing the Project
Sponsor, Dawn Trennart – Neighborhood Association, James Shu, Joel Koppel,
Michael Tornabene – SPUR, and Tim Colen – HAC; In opposition: Sally
Rosenman, Anne Thilges, Karen Dold, Sam Montoya, Linda Chapman, and Brad Thilges
ACTION: Approved per neighborhood agreement
AYES:
Antonini, Moore, Sugaya, Olague and Miguel
ABSENT: Borden
MOTION: 18216
6.
2010.0908T
(D.
Sider: (415) 558-6697)
Consideration of an Ordinance related to Mobile Food Facilities and Temporary
Uses
- Initiated by Supervisor Bevan Dufty under Board File Number 101351, this
Ordinance would make amendments to the Planning Code including adding Section
102.31 to define a Mobile Food Facility, amending Section 205 and adding Section
205.4 to establish a new category of temporary uses, and amending Sections 212,
790.91, 790.93 and 890.90 to clarify that Mobile Food Facilities need not be
conducted within enclosed buildings.
Preliminary Recommendation:
Approval
SPEAKERS: In
support: Hugh Schick, Matt Cohen – Off the Grid, and Brad Paul
ACTION: Approved as modified to extend to 300 square feet
AYES:
Antonini, Moore, Sugaya, Olague and Miguel
ABSENT: Borden
RESOLUTION: 18217
7.
2010.0837T
(S. WERTHEIM: (415) 558-6612)
AMENDMENTS TO THE
SOUTH OF MARKET YOUTH AND FAMILY SPECIAL USE DISTRICT
- The Planning Commission will consider a Planning
Code Amendment to Section 249.40A, as proposed by an Ordinance introduced at the
Board of Supervisors (Board of Supervisors File No. 101093 (Daly)). The
proposed Ordinance would increase affordable housing requirements in the SoMa
Youth and Family Special Use District, bounded generally by Natoma Street on the
north, Harrison Street on the south, 4th Street on the east, and 7th Street on
the west. The increase would be from the City’s baseline affordable housing
requirements (15% on-site or 20% off-site/in-lieu) to the Eastern Neighborhoods
“Tier C” affordable housing requirements (22% on-site or 27% off-site/in-lieu)
for projects tangent to the following streets within the Special Use District:
4th St., 5th St., 6th St., 7th St., Howard St., Folsom St., and Harrison St.
Preliminary Recommendation: Recommend disapproval of the proposed
Ordinance.
SPEAKERS: April –
Supervisor Daily’s Office and Angelica Carbande - SOMCAN
ACTION: Approved the intent of the proposed ordinance moving forward
with the continued interaction of the Supervisor’s office, the community, the
Planning Department, and other city agencies
AYES: Moore,
Sugaya, Olague and Miguel
NAYES: Antonini
ABSENT: Borden
RESOLUTION: 18219
8.
2010.0833T
(A. RODGERS: (415) 558-6395)
PROPOSED COMMISSION-SPONSORED PLANNING CODE AMENDMENTS RELATED
to the Upper Market Street Neighborhood Commercial District
- The
Planning Commission will consider a Resolution to recommend adoption of
amendments to the Planning Code. The amendments are intended to apply new
development impact fees and design controls to the existing neighborhood
commercial district. The draft ordinance would amend the San Francisco Planning
Code including amendments to Sections 134, 145.4, 151.1, 155, 207.7, 207.8,
263.20, 401, 416 et seq., 421.1, 421.3, 421.5, 721, and 721.1 as the sections
relate to the Upper Market Street Neighborhood Commercial District (Upper Market
NCD) and to extend the Market and Octavia Community Infrastructure Fee area to
include the Upper Market Street Neighborhood Commercial District lying outside
the Market and Octavia Plan area. The controls will amend the parking and
loading requirements; require ground floor commercial on this portion of Market
Street; amend certain design requirements; and make other amendments; adopting
findings, including environmental findings, Section 302 findings, and findings
of consistency with the General Plan and the Priority Policies of Planning Code
Section 101.1.
Recommend: Approval with Modification
SPEAKERS: In support: Andrea Aiello – Castro/Upper Market Community
Benefit District, Lee Moulton – TSAO Design Group, David Troup – Duboce Triangle
Neighborhood Association, Joe Curtin – Castro Area Planning & Action, Dennis
Richards – Duboce Triangle Neighborhood Association, Judith Hoyem –
Castro/Eureka Valley Neighborhood Association, Redmond Land, John McConnel, and
Gavin Buckly; In opposition: Mitchell Benjamin – Sternberg Benjamin
Architects, Gregory Clark, and Jeff Rocca
ACTION: Approved per staff recommendations
AYES:
Antonini, Moore, Sugaya, Olague and Miguel
ABSENT: Borden
RESOLUTION: 18220
9.
2010.0839T
(T. SULLIVAN: (415) 558-6257)
Amendments to the Planning Code Residential Inclusionary Affordable Housing
Program.
[BOS FILE NO. 10-1095]
- Hearing of a proposed Ordinance that would amend amending the Residential
Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program, Planning Code Sections 415 et seq. to
exempt certain Qualified Student Housing Projects, as defined, if the project
meets certain requirements; and making findings including environmental
findings. The Commission will consider an Ordinance introduced by Supervisor
Dufty that would amend the Planning Code as described with additional
modifications as recommended by the Planning Department and making various
findings including environmental findings, Planning Code Section 101 and 302
findings, and General Plan consistency findings.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Modifications
SPEAKERS: In support: Tim Colen – SF Housing Action Coalition, James
Haas – Civic Center Stakeholders Group, David Meckel – California college of
Arts, David Sewark – UC Hastings College of Law, Jason Smith – SF Conservatory
of Music, Brad Paul, Henry Kernilowicz, Glenn Lewis, USF, Clark Damus
ACTION: Approved as modified
AYES: Moore,
Sugaya, Olague and Miguel
NAYES: Antonini
ABSENT: Borden
RESOLUTION: 18218
10. (J. SWITZKY:
(415) 575-6815/M. YARNE: 554-6512)
PARK MERCED MIXED-USE PROJECT OVERVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT –
INFORMATIONAL ONLY
– Parkmerced is generally bounded by 19th Avenue to the east, Lake
Merced Boulevard to the west, Holloway Avenue to the north, and Stanley
Boulevard to the south. The proposed project includes those lots owned by
Parkmerced Investors, LLC, and includes Assessor’s Blocks 7303, 7303A, 7308-311,
7314, 7316, 7319-26, 7330-45, 7333 A-B, 7333E & 7353-7373. Parkmerced is a
rental housing complex constructed between 1941-1951 consisting of approxmiately
3,200 existing residential units and owned by Parkmerced Investors, LLC.
Informational Hearing to provide an overview of the proposed project components
and draft Development Agreement. The project, which would be implemented
over 20-30 years in multiple phases, includes the addition of approximately
5,700 net new residential units, the demolition and replacement of approximately
1,800 existing units which would remain subject to the San Francisco Rent
Stabilization Ordinance, rent-protections and relocation rights for existing
tenants, re-alignment and re-design of streets and blocks, re-alignment and
improvement of the M Ocean View light rail line, the addition of new
neighborhood serving retail and office space, new and re-configured public open
spaces including neighborhood parks, pedestrian and bike paths, athletic fields,
a new organic farm, and community gardens, overall transportation improvements,
ecological hydrology improvements, and provision of renewable energy and water
infrastructure. The draft Development Agreement would become the binding legal
contract between the City and the Developer and would memorialize all of the
public benefits and obligations of the Developer and associated agreements
between both parties toward implementation of the Project.
Preliminary Recommendation: No Action Requested. Informational Discussion Only.
SPEAKERS: In support: Daniel Phillips, Seth – Project Sponsor, Julie
Brook, Jim Cook, Dearman McPill, and Tom Rocca; In opposition: Maria
Elena Querrero Enqbes, Lora Traveler, Healani Ting, Cathy Lentz, Eric Brooks,
Mitchelle Omniburg, and Jeff Rocca
ACTION: Informational hearing – although no action was taken by the
Commission, it was decided that the Commission would hold one of these
informational meetings in the community (December 9, 2010).
11.
2010.0583C
(M. WOODS: (415) 558-6315)
3575 GEARY BOULEVARD (THE INSTITUTE ON AGING)
– south side between Arguello Boulevard and Stanyan Street; Lots 010 and 011 in
Assessor’s Block 1084 (formerly Block 1083, Lot 2 and Block 1084, Lot 4) -
Request for Conditional Use Authorization under Sections 174 and 303 of the
Planning Code to modify a Condition of Approval (#D(3)) as previously imposed
under Planning Commission Motion No. 17219 relating to a Conditional Use
authorization for Case No. 2003.0410CEK! approved on April 6, 2006, and
modified by the Board of Supervisors in its Motion No. M06-55 on May 23, 2006,
which approved the demolition of the Coronet Theater and the construction of a
six-story mixed use project that includes 120 affordable dwelling units for
seniors, 30 supportive housing units for seniors with special needs, office,
meeting and senior health services space and 95 off-street parking spaces in an
NC-3 (Moderate-Scale Neighborhood Commercial) District and an 80-A Height and
Bulk District. The current proposal is to modify the previously-imposed
condition to eliminate the requirement for 28 valet parking spaces, for a total
of 67 spaces. Valet parking will be provided for large meetings/conferences with
50 or more attendees.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
SPEAKERS: In support: Steve Vettel – representing the Project
Sponsor, and Ken Donnally – Institute on Aging; In opposition: Rick
Wermer
ACTION: Following two failed motions to approve (1) with valet parking
for any event; or (2) per staff recommendation, the item was continued to
November 18, 2010 to allow the absent commissioner the opportunity to
participate in the final action. The public hearing will remain closed.
AYES:
Antonini, Moore, Sugaya, Olague and Miguel
ABSENT: Borden
12.
2010.0768D
(S. CALTAGIRONE: (415) 558-6625)
2220 BEACH STREET
- north side between Broderick and Baker Streets; Lot
007 in Assessor’s Block 0915 - Request for Discretionary Review of
Building Permit Application No. 2008.0905.0930, proposing to construct a
one-story vertical addition at the roof of the existing two-story, single-family
house and to install decks on the roofs of the second and third floors at the
rear of the building located within an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family)
Zoning District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Staff Analysis: Abbreviated Discretionary Review
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and
approve.
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: DR was withdrawn prior to the hearing
13.
2010.0802D
(G. CABREROS: (415) 558-6169)
2774-2776 Filbert Street
-
north side between Baker and Broderick Streets; Lot 014A in Assessor's Block
0942 - Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application
No. 2009.09.09.6467 proposing to construct a one-story vertical addition to the
existing three-story, two-unit building resulting in a four-story, two-unit
building in an RH-2 (Residential House, Two-Family) District and a 40-X Height
and Bulk District.
Staff Analysis: Abbreviated Discretionary Review
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve.
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: Without hearing, Continued to December 16, 2010
AYES:
Antonini, Moore, Sugaya, Olague and Miguel
ABSENT: Borden
14.
2009.0828D
(G. CABREROS: (415) 558-6169)
335 Marina Boulevard
- south side between Casa Way and Fillmore Street; Lot 027 in Assessor's Block
0419A - Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application
No. 2009.02.17.2166 proposing to construct three-story front and side horizontal
additions and a two-story rear addition to the existing three-story,
single-family residence in an RH-1 (Residential House, Single-Family) District
and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Staff Analysis: Abbreviated Discretionary Review
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary
Review and approve.
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: DR was withdrawn prior to the hearing
I.
PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of
the public may address the Commission on items of interest to the public that
are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda
items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Commission
will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception.
When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which
members of the public were allowed to testify and the Commission has closed the
public hearing, your opportunity to address the Commission must be exercised
during the Public Comment portion of the Calendar. Each member of the public
may address the Commission for up to three minutes.
The Brown Act forbids a
commission from taking action or discussing any item not appearing on the posted
agenda, including those items raised at public comment. In response to public
comment, the commission is limited to:
(1) responding
to statements made or questions posed by members of the public; or
(2) requesting
staff to report back on a matter at a subsequent meeting; or
(3)
directing staff to place the item on a future agenda. (Government Code
Section 54954.2(a))
SPEAKERS: None
Adjournment:
10:53 p.m.
Adopted: December 2, 2010
