August 22, 2007
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY AND COUNTY OF
SAN FRANCISCO
Notice of Hearing on Application
For Zoning Variance
CITY HALL - Room 408
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
Wednesday, AUGUST 22, 2007
Session Begins at 9:30 A.M.
Public Hearing
Lawrence Badiner, Zoning Administrator
Marge Gambelin, Recording Secretary
Notice is hereby given to the general public and to owners of the subject property and other property within 300 feet that an application for variance under the Planning Code as described below has been filed with the Zoning Administrator.
Any remaining questions concerning this application review process may be answered by the Planning Information Center at (415) 558-6377.
Variance Calendars are available on the Internet at http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/planning/variance.htm.
|
Accessible Meeting Policy
Hearings are held at City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 408, Fourth Floor, San Francisco, CA. The closest accessible BART Station is the Civic Center Station located at the intersection of Market, Hyde and Grove Streets. Accessible curb side parking has been designated at points along McAllister Street. Accessible MUNI Lines serving City Hall are the 42 Downtown Loop, 9 San Bruno and 71 Haight/Noriega and the F Line. Accessible MUNI Metro Lines are the J, K, L, M, and N. For more information regarding MUNI accessible services, call (415) 923-6142. American sign language interpreters and/or a sound enhancement system will be available upon request by contacting Lulu Hwang at (415) 558-6318 at least 72 hours prior to a hearing. Individuals with severe allergies, environmental illnesses, multiple chemical sensitivity or related disabilities should call our accessibility hotline at (415) 554-8925 to discuss meeting accessibility. In order to assist the City's efforts to accommodate such people, attendees at public meetings are reminded that other attendees may be sensitive to various chemical based products. Please help the City to accommodate these individuals.
Cell Phone and/or Sound-Producing Electronic Devices Usage at Hearings
Effective January 21, 2001, the Board of Supervisors amended the Sunshine Ordinance by adding the following provision: The ringing of and use of cell phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting. Please be advised that the Chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of a cell phone, pager, or other similar sound-producing electronic devices.
Know Your Rights Under the Sunshine Ordinance
Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decisions in full view of the public. Commissions, boards, councils and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's review.
For more information on your rights under the Sunshine ordinance (Chapter 67 of the San Francisco Administrative Code) or to report a violation of the ordinance, contact Donna Hall, Administrator, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 409, by phone at (415) 554-7724, by fax at (415) 554-7854 or by E-mail at Donna_Hall@ci.sf.ca.us.
Attention:Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance [SF Admin.. Code 16.520 - 16.534] to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the Ethics Commission at 1390 Market Street #701, San Francisco, CA 94102, telephone (415) 554-9510, fax (415) 703-0121 and web site http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/ethics/.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
NOTICE OF HEARING ON
APPLICATION FOR ZONING VARIANCE
Notice is hereby given to the general public and to owners of the subject property and other property within 300 feet that an application for variance under the City Planning Code as
described below has been filed with the Zoning Administrator and will be considered at a PUBLIC HEARING to be held on Wednesday, August 22, 2007, City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 408 as follows:
9:30 A.M.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed hereunder constitute a Consent Calendar and are considered to be routine by the Zoning Administrator. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the public so requests, in which case the matter shall be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered as a separate item at this time or at a future hearing.
(AARON STARR)
1. 2007.0253V: 2364-2366 FULTON STREET, north side between Willard and Parsons Streets; Lot 008 in Assessor's Block 1169, in an RH-3 (Residential, House, Three-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct a 3-story spiral staircase approximately 9' in diameter at the rear of the 3.5 story 2-unit building, and small decks at each level to access the proposed staircase. The proposed staircase will be located approximately 4.5' away from the rear of the building, 5' away from the east side property line and 11' away from the west side property line.
Section 134(a)(2) of the Planning Code requires the subject property to have a rear yard equal to approximately 33'. The proposed spiral staircase will be located entirely within the required rear yard setback.
(ADRIAN PUTRA)
REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct two new decks and a staircase at the rear of an existing, non-complying two-unit building. The new staircase shall act as a second means of egress.
Section 134 of the Planning Code requires that the subject property maintain a rear yard that measures 15 feet in depth by taking the average rear yard setback of the adjacent neighboring property. The existing two-unit building has a non-complying rear yard setback of approximately 14.5 feet. The addition to add two decks and a staircase would encroach an additional 10 feet into the required rear yard, thereby providing a rear yard that measures approximately 4.5 feet in depth.
Section 188 of the Planning Code allows a non-complying structure to be altered, providing that there is no new or increased discrepancy at any level between existing conditions on the lot and the required standards of the Planning Code. The existing two-unit building constitutes a non-complying structure within the required rear yard with an existing rear yard setback of approximately 14.5 feet, where 15 feet is required. The addition to add two decks and a staircase would increase the discrepancy between the existing building and the standards of the Planning Code by 10 feet.
(KATE CONNER)
REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct a one-story rear horizontal addition with a roof deck to an existing single family dwelling within the required rear yard.
Section 134 of the Planning Code requires that the subject property maintain a rear yard that measures 41 feet in length. The proposed new horizontal rear addition encroaches approximately 16 feet into the required rear yard, thereby providing a rear yard that measures approximately 25 feet in length.
(MICHAEL SMITH)
REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct egress stairs that would infill the light well in the rear yard along the north side property line.
Section 134 of the Planning Code requires that the subject property maintain a rear yard that measures approximately 20' in length. The proposed new stairs encroach approximately 20' into the required rear yard, thereby providing no rear yard.
Section 188 of the Planning Code prohibits the expansion of a noncomplying structure. Because the rear portion of the existing building already encroaches approximately 20' into the required rear yard, it is considered a legal noncomplying structure. Therefore expansion as proposed would be contrary to Section 188.
(AARON HOLLISTER)
MINIMUM LOT SIZE, REAR YARD AND OPEN SPACE VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to subdivide the subject through lot into two lots. Both structures on the subject property would be completely contained within each of the proposed lots. No construction or physical expansions of the structures on the project site are proposed under this application.
Section 121 of the Planning Code requires a minimum lot size of 1750 square feet. The proposed lot fronting Rose Street will be 1375 square feet.
Section 134 of the Planning Code requires that the Page Street lot maintain a 17.5' rear yard setback and that the Rose Street lot maintain a 15' rear yard setback. The proposed property line would create non-complying yards of 11' and 0' for the Page and Rose Street lots respectively.
Section 135 of the Planning Code requires that the proposed lots contain 100 square feet of usable open space per dwelling unit with a minimum horizontal dimension of 10 feet. The Rose Street lot will have a maximum horizontal measurement of 8'.
(BEN FU)
B. REGULAR CALENDAR
(MARY WOODS)
9. 2007.0398V: 2250 JACKSON STREET, north side between Webster and Buchanan Streets; Lot 008 in Assessor's Block 0589, in an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District. The lot is a through lot, with the front of its single building facing Jackson Street while the rear faces Bromley Place.
REAR YARD AND NON-COMPLYING STRUCTURE VARIANCES SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct a one-story side infill with a roof deck at the rear of the building.
Section 134 of the Planning Code requires the minimum rear yard depth to be 45 percent of the total depth of the lot or the average depth of the rear walls of adjacent buildings to a minimum of 25 percent of the lot depth or 15 feet, whichever is greater. The required rear yard for the subject property would be approximately 29 feet. A portion of the existing one-story extension at the rear of the building already encroaches approximately 11.5 feet into the required rear yard. A small portion (approximately 5 feet wide by 11.5 feet long) of the proposed side addition (measuring approximately 5 feet wide by 22 feet long) would be located entirely within the required rear yard, thereby providing a rear yard that measures approximately 18 feet in length.
Section 188 of the Planning Code prohibits the expansion, intensification or change in use of a non-complying structure. Because the existing building already encroaches into the required rear yard setback, it is considered a legal, non-complying structure. The proposed side addition at the rear of the building is considered an expansion of a non-complying structure and therefore the project as proposed would be contrary to Section 188.
(SHELLEY PERDUE)
SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD VARIANCES SOUGHT: The proposal is to create a single parking space in the west side yard of the subject property, to remove the existing rear yard detached garage structure, and to construct a new garden shed in the rear yard.
Section 133 of the Planning Code requires three-foot wide side yards along each side of the subject property. The project includes the creation of a parking space that occupies a portion of the western required side yard.
Section 134 of the Planning Code requires a minimum rear yard equal to 25 percent of the total depth of lot. The required rear yard for the subject property is 25 feet. The proposed garden shed (117 square feet and 9'-4 high) exceeds the 100 square foot area and 8' height maximum allowed for garden structures within the required rear yard.
(AARON STARR)
11. 2006.0570V: 1629-1635 GREEN STREET, south side between Franklin and Gough Streets; Lot 023 in Assessor's Block 0552, in an RH- 2 (Residential House 2- Family) District with a 40-X Height and Bulk Designation.
REAR YARD AND NON-COMPLYING STRUCTURE VARIANCES SOUGHT: The proposal is to construct an approximately 9' wide by 12.5' deep, 2-story rear addition and an approximately 11.5' tall shade trellis structure at the rear of the rear building. The subject property has two buildings on the lot, a two-story single-family building at the front of the lot and a two-story single-family building at the back of the lot.
Section 134 of the Planning Code requires the subject property to have a rear yard equal to 45% of the lot depth or approximately 62'. The proposed rear addition and trellis are located entirely within the required rear yard setback.
Section 188(a) of the Planning Code prohibits the expansion of a legal non-complying structure. The existing building is considered a legal non-complying structure because it is located entirely within the required rear yard setback. Therefore, the proposed expansion would be contrary to Section 188 of the Planning Code.
(SHARON YOUNG)
OFF-STREET PARKING VARIANCE: The proposal is to legalize the addition of one dwelling unit on the ground floor of the one-story over garage, single-family dwelling. A single off-street parking space will continue to be provided in the existing garage.
Section 151 of the Planning Code of the Planning Code requires one full-size, independently accessible parking space for each newly created dwelling unit. No parking space is proposed for the second dwelling unit.
(MICHAEL SMITH)
REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT: The proposal is to legalize the as built addition to the structure at the rear of the lot and convert the area to habitable space that is accessory to the single-family dwelling located at the front of the lot.
Section 134 of the Planning Code requires that the subject property maintain a rear yard that measures approximately 25' in length. The as built addition encroaches approximately 25' into the required rear yard, thereby providing no rear yard.
Section 188 of the Planning Code prohibits the expansion or intensification of a noncomplying structure. Because there was an existing detached garage structure at the rear of the lot that already encroached approximately 25' into the required rear yard, it is considered a legal noncomplying structure. Therefore expansion and conversion of the structure to habitable area as constructed is contrary to Section 188.
(ELIZABETH WATTY)
REAR YARD AND NONCOMPLYING STRUCTURE VARIANCES SOUGHT: The proposal is to modify the roofline over the rear portion of the existing single-family dwelling from a shed roof to a hipped roof. The rear portion of the dwelling extends into the required rear yard and is considered a legal noncomplying structure. This proposal will increase the height of the existing noncomplying structure. Alterations including a deck enclosure at the second floor, the addition of a bay window at the first floor, and the addition of a new dormer are included in the project but do not require a variance. These alterations will be included under a separate neighborhood notification.
Section 134 of the Planning Code requires that the subject property maintain a rear yard that measures 20-feet in length, parallel to the rear property line. The existing dwelling encroaches into this required rear yard by approximately 7-feet, 6-inches, and is considered a noncomplying structure. The proposal is to modify the roofline at this rear portion of the house, by replacing the low shed-roof with a new hipped-roof. This change to the roofline will increase the discrepancy of the noncomplying structure, because it will increase the volume located within the required rear yard. This volumetric expansion is contrary to Planning Code Section 134 and requires a rear yard variance.
Section 188 of the Planning Code does not permit the expansion or modification of a noncomplying structure. The proposal seeks to modify the roofline on a noncomplying building in order to increase the floor-to-ceiling height in the Master Bedroom, and to provide a more uniform roofline. The proposed modification to the existing noncomplying structure is contrary to Section 188 and requires a noncomplying structure variance.
(MAT SNYDER)
REAR YARD VARIANCE SOUGHT. The proposal is restore the existing historical cottage and move it forward by seven-feet on the lot and to construct two new units to the rear of the cottage in a forty-foot tall addition.
Section 134(c) of the Planning Code requires a rear yard measured 39-feet from the rear property-line. The proposal is to construct an addition that would extend approximately 23-feet from the rear property-line.
(TIM FRYE)
(TIM FRYE)
(MICHELLE GLUECKERT)
(MICHELLE GLUECKERT)
(MICHELLE GLUECKERT)
Public Comment:
At this time, members of the public may address the Zoning Administrator on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Zoning Administrator except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Zoning Administrator will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each member of the public may address the Zoning Administrator for up to three minutes.
The Zoning Administrator will not take action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, including those items raised at public comment. In response to public comment, the Zoning Administrator may:
- respond to statements made or questions posed by members of the public; or
- request staff to report back on a matter at a subsequent meeting; or
- direct staff to place the item on a future agenda. (Government Code Section 54954.2(a))
ADJOURNMENT