May 07, 2008 FINAL ACTION MINUTES
OF THE
SAN FRANCISCO
LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING
CITY HALL
1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE, ROOM 400
May 7, 2008
12:04 P.M. ROLL CALL
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
Committee Members Present: Karl Hasz, Bridget Maley (Ex-Officio), Alan Martinez
Committee Member Absent: Johanna Street
1. (S. PERDUE: 415/558-6625)
3800 WASHINGTON STREET, Koshland House, north side between Cherry and Maple Streets. Assessor's Block 0989, Lot 028 - Request for Review and Comment before the Architectural Review Committee regarding proposed alterations to the rear façade, penthouse, roof, and landscaping features. The Koshland House is San Francisco Landmark No. 95. The site is zoned RH-1 (Residential, Single-Family) District and is in a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Speaker(s):
Aleck Wilson
Jay Turnbull
Halsey Minor
Board Comments
The Architectural Review Committee members had the following comments:
- Some level of change is acceptable at the rear façade of the building but the current proposal will remove an unacceptable amount of historic fabric and will create an overly formal and ornate façade.
- Removal of the existing rear stair and construction of a terrace at the rear façade would be appropriate if the ornamentation is sufficiently subdued so as to be clearly differentiated from the historic elements of the building and to be subordinate in character.
- The window openings and window surround details should be retained at the first floor level of the rear façade, but that the opening may be modified to accommodate doors leading onto the proposed terrace.
- Some level of change in the pattern of openings at the second floor would be appropriate, such as the introduction of new windows openings and infill of the open porch, but the existing window openings should remain unchanged in terms of scale and detailing. The openings at this level should remain uniform in height and the addition of falconets would be inappropriate.
- The projection of the center bays would be an inappropriate and unnecessary change to the façade.
- The use of historicized detailing at the rear façade was in keeping with the false historicity of the original design and is appropriate so long as the new architectural features employ some subtle differentiation of color, material, or design that would identify them to an architectural historian as later alterations.
- The basement level's access to light and air should be examined more closely.
- Extreme care should be taken in the removal of the ivy from the facades in order to minimize damage to the stone surface.
- The alterations to the penthouse and the introduction of new fencing at the site are appropriate changes, however the proposed fence should be of quality materials and design.
- The light standards and room uses should be indicated on the elevations and plans.
12:58 P.M. ROLL CALL
FOR FULL LANDMARKS BOARD CONSIDERATION
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chan Cherny, Damkroger, Dearman, Hasz, Maley, Martinez, Samaha
BOARD MEMBER(S) ABSENT: Street
STAFF IN ATTENDANCE: Mark Luellen, Preservation Coordinator; M. Corrette; A. Heitter; P. LaValley; S. Middlebrook; S. Perdue; Andrea Green, Commission Secretary; Marlena Byrne, Deputy City Attorney
PUBLIC COMMENT
None at this time.
REPORTS
- STAFF REPORT AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mark Luellen, Preservation Coordinator:
i Commissioner Sue Lee has resigned and Ron Miguel has been appointed to the Planning Commission, there is still one vacancy left.
On April 29th, the ordinance to designate 900 Innes Avenue was approved by the Board of Supervisors.
i On April 22nd, the Planning Code Amendments to implement the Market and Octavia Area Plan was approved by the Board of Supervisors. He will keep the Board posted on the proposed procedures for the review of historic resources that will involve the Landmarks Board.
- On May 22nd, the 1st adoption hearing for the Eastern Neighborhoods will be heard by the Planning Commission.
- On May 1st, the Planning Commission approved the landmark designation for 1969 California Street.
i On June 18th, Tim Brandt from the Office of Historic Preservation will provide a presentation to the Landmarks Board on the Secretary of the Interior Standards.
i The Landmarks Board hearing scheduled for July 2nd will be cancelled.
President Maley
She asked if there has been any update on the proposed site visit to the Metro Theater.
Mark Luellen
There has been no update.
2. PRESIDENT'S REPORT AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
None at this time.
3. MATTERS OF THE BOARD
Maley
She asked if the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board had jurisdiction over the Golden Gate Bridge. She asked if the Landmarks Board members comment on the Golden Gate Bridge as individuals or as a Board.
Cherny
He asked when the Presidio Trust will come back before the Landmarks Board. He asked whether the Presidio Trust will come back before the Landmarks Board so the Landmarks Board could comment as a whole whether Board members should comment as individuals on the proposed project.
Luellen
He informed the Board that the Planning Department would not be commenting on the Presidio project officially. It's not the Planning Department's intent to bring the Presidio Trust item back before the Landmarks Board.
He requested to agendize another review of the Presidio Trust item.
- LANDMARKS WORK PROGRAM 2005-2007 UPDATE
Maley
She believes there is enough information to move forward with the Park Merced designation.
Luellen
The designation report for the Congregational Emmanuel Religious School will be reviewed by the Landmarks Board in early June.
PUBLIC COMMENT WAS OPENED AND HEARD FOR ITEM #11
Speaker(s):
Archie Green
Tape No: 1a
ACTION ITEM(S)
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine by the Planning Department, and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Landmarks Board. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the Board, the public, or staff so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing.
5. 2008.0421A (A. HEITTER: 415/558-6602)
267-271 FILBERT STREET, south side between Montgomery and Sansome Streets, Assessor's Block 0106, Lot 33 - Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a new window opening on the east side facade, measuring 76" wide by 42" high to accommodate a new fixed window. The four-story Modern-style residential building is a contributor to the Telegraph Hill Historic District; it is in an RH-3 (Residential, House, Three-Family) Zoning District and is in a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval
Speaker(s):
None
Board Action
It was moved by Board Member Damkroger (seconded by Dearman) to approve the Consent Calendar. The vote was unanimous.
AYES: Chan, Cherny, Damkroger, Dearman, Hasz, Maley, Martinez, Samaha
NOES: None
ABSENT: Street
6. APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 16, 2008 DRAFT ACTION MINUTES.
Speaker(s):
None
Board Action
It was moved by Board Member Damkroger (seconded by Dearman) to approve the draft action minutes. The vote was unanimous.
AYES: Chan, Cherny, Damkroger, Dearman, Hasz, Maley, Martinez, Samaha
NOES: None
ABSENT: Street
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
7. 2008.0383A (P. LaVALLEY: 415/575-9084)
101 Townsend Street, is located in Assessor's Block 3794, Lot 015. Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove non-historic canopy and metal security gate, remove and replace non-historic storefront, install one new window opening, and install one new tenant sign on Townsend façade. The subject property, formerly known as Warehouse Investment Company building, is a contributing structure to the South End Historic District and is located within a M-2 (Heavy Industrial) District with a 105-F Height and Bulk limit.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval
Speaker(s):
Al Burrell
Board Action
It was moved by Board Member Hasz (seconded by Chan) to approve the Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness. Project sponsor will work with staff to determine if a transom on the new window is appropriate. The vote was unanimous.
AYES: Chan, Cherny, Damkroger, Dearman, Hasz, Maley, Martinez, Samaha
NOES: None
ABSENT: Street
Tape No: 1b
8. 2008.0416A (S. PERDUE: 415/558-6625)
851 BEACH STREET, (aka 900 North Point), Ghirardelli Square, on block bound by Beach, North Point, Larkin, and Polk Streets. Assessor's Block 0086, Lot 012 - Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for converting the ground floor space of the Mustard Building into a new restaurant space, involving façade and site alterations. Ghiradelli Square is designated San Francisco Landmark No. 30 and is listed on the National and California Registers of Historic Places. The site is zoned C-2 (Commercial) District and is in a 40-X Height and Bulk District, and is also within the Northern Waterfront Special Use District No. 2.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
Speaker(s):
Nancy Coldepole
Board Action
It was moved by Board Member Cherny (seconded by Samaha) to accept the recusal of Board Member Damkroger from this item. The vote was unanimous.
AYES: Chan, Cherny, Damkroger, Dearman, Hasz, Maley, Martinez, Samaha
NOES: None
ABSENT: Street
It was moved by Board Member Hasz (seconded by Samaha) to approve the Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness. The vote was unanimous.
AYES: Chan, Cherny, Dearman, Hasz, Maley, Martinez, Samaha
NOES: None
ABSENT: Street
RECUSED: Damkroger
Tape No: 1b
REVIEW AND COMMENT
9. 2007.1106A (S. MIDDLEBROOK: 415/558-6372)
236 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, SUNNYSIDE CONSERVATORY, Assessor's Block 6770; Lot 057. The subject property is local San Francisco Landmark Number 78, and is located within an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-family) District with a 40-X Height and Bulk limit. Request for Review and Comment on the rehabilitation project's 95% complete construction drawings. This hearing is being held in accordance with the Conditions of Approval associated with the Certificate of Appropriateness that was approved in October 2007.
Speaker(s):
Paulina Araica
Board Comments
The Landmarks Board members had the following comments:
- Questioned who will be preparing the history and interpretative panel and requested that a final draft of the interpretive display be reviewed by the LPAB prior to installation.
- Questioned if there was a budget for relocating the historic tree.
- Suggested providing options to the Zoning Administrator with suggestion if there isn't a budget for the tree removal.
- Recommended doing an evaluation of the historic landscape.
- Suggested that a photo of the tree and the original interior be included in the exhibit.
- Suggested protecting copper elements from thieves.
- Suggested using synthetic wood shingles (fire proof) for the roof.
- Recommended that the windows remain operable for ventilation.
- Encouraged the Department of Recreation and Park to revise the landmark designation to include the significant trees that are located on the site.
- Recommended hiring a qualified contractor who has experience working on historic buildings.
- Recommended calling the contractor's references.
- Requested the Department of Recreation and Park to return to the Landmarks Board with interim reports/update on how construction of the project is proceeding.
Tape No: 1b and 2a
10. 2008.0362F (P. LaVALLEY: 415/575-9084)
121 Golden Gate Avenue, the St. Anthony Foundation Dining Room, is located on the southwest corner of Golden Gate Avenue and Jones Street, in Assessor's Block 0394, Lot 001. Request for Review and Comment on the documentation and draft Memorandum of Agreement prepared by the Mayor's Office of Housing (MOH) for Section 106 review of the proposed demolition of existing structure and construction of a new building. Consistent with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, MOH has requested comments on the effects the proposed undertaking could have upon historic properties. The site is zoned RC-4 (Residential-Commercial-Combined, High-Density) and is in an 80-120-T Height and Bulk District.
Speaker(s):
Sharon Christen
Board Comment
The Landmarks Board members had the following comments:
- Feels that this is a failure of review as the report provides no analysis and contains a lengthy quote on history of Tenderloin without any context.. In the report, there is no analysis/discussion as to the potential effect of the proposed project on the Hibernia Bank (a significant building).
- The report is inadequate and suggested starting over. Embarrassed to send on the SHPO with current report.
- Suggested reviewing the guidelines for writing historic reports.
- Suggested that if additional research is performed that the Landmarks Board should review any additional research.
- Suggested that documentation requirement should be more specific about the facades of the building (not just photo documentation of the exterior).
- Recommended that Planning staff determine what interior elements should be photographed.
- Recommended that copy of HABS documentation be submitted to the Landmarks Board for review in addition to submittal to the Planning Department.
- Suggested a more descriptive description of what should be included in reviewing the new construction materials.
- Questioned if SHPO had the opportunity to comment on the APE.
- Suggested that the APE should cross Market Street. Feels that the building would be visible.
- Suggested providing the new construction drawings in color before returning to the Landmarks Board.
- Provide better visual simulation of new construction as it relates to other surrounding buildings.
Tape No: 2a
11. (M. CORRETTE: 415/558-6295)
Central Waterfront Cultural Resource Survey Update, Adopt a resolution endorsing and recommending to the Planning Commission, the Central Waterfront Cultural Resource Survey Update (# 41 California Department of Parks and Recreation Survey Forms – DPR 523L Update forms to previously endorsed DPR 523A and 523B forms) and the new Central Waterfront draft Potrero Point Historic District / Context Statement. The Central Waterfront Survey Area is bound by Pennsylvania Street to the west, San Francisco Bay to the east, 16th Street to the north and Islais Creek to the south. This Update includes the following properties:
20th and Illinois Streets Paving; 3rd St. Light Standards; 651 Illinois St. (Pier 66, Boat Repair Storage ); Block 3942 Lots 002 & 003 420 17th St.; Block 3943 Lot 003 1830 3rd St.; Block 3994 Lot 002 2085 3rd St. Gilmore Oil Co. Office Bldg; Block 3994 Lot 003 550 18th St.; Block 3994 Lot 003 2075 3rd St.; Block 3994 Lot 004 701 16th St.; Block 3995 Lot 007 2092 3rd St.; Block 3996 Lots 015 & 018 501 555 Minnesota St.; Block 3998 Lot s017 & 018 580 598 Indiana St. Block 4043 Lot 013 725 18th St. Block 4044 Lot 002 721 Tennessee St. Block 4044 Lot 002a 2130 3rd St.; Block 4044 Lot 003 2146 2148 3rd St.; Block 4044 Lot 004 2150 2152 3rd St.; Block 4058 Lot 005 2289 2295 3rd St.; Block 4058 Lot 009 2201 2203 3rd St.; Block 4058 Lot 010 2225 3rd St.; Block 4058 Lot 010 2255 3rd St.; Block 4059 Lot 001A-001B 815 825 Tennessee St.; Block 4059 Lot 009 2290 2298 3rd St.; Block 4108 Lot 003 2350 3rd St.; Block 4108 Lot 003A 2342 2344 3rd St.; Block 4108 Lot 003D 2476 2478 3rd St.; Block 4108 Lot 003F 2420 3rd St.; Block 4108 Lot 003J 2440 3rd St.; Block 4108 Lot 003R 2360 2364 3rd St.; Block 4108 Lot 030 2400 3rd St.; Block 4172 Lot 016 2620 3rd St.; Block 4172 Lot 018 2624 2626 3rd St.; Block 4172 Lot 019 2628 2632 3rd St.; Block 4173 Lot 001 2501 3rd St. American Can Co. Southern Ext.; Block 4229 Lot 004 1275 Minnesota St.; Block 4231 Lot 002 1300 Illinois St.; Block 4247 Lot 002 1000 25th Street; Block 4314 Lot 001a 3003 3095 3rd St.; Block 4377 Lot 001 3201 3rd St.; Block 4378 Lot 006 3240 3rd St.; Block 9900 Lot 084 Pier 84 & Copra Crane;
The Central Waterfront survey was conducted by the Planning Department in 2000, and endorsed by the Landmarks Board and Planning Commission in 2001. In 2003, the State Office of Historic Preservation changed California Historic Resource Status Codes, eliminating several codes. This update addresses that change and updates the Central Waterfront Survey to current Status Codes.
The Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board will consider the following three actions:
1. Evaluate any owner's objection (should there be any) to the proposed California Historic Resources Status Code (CHRSC) assigned, and either endorse the proposed CHRSC, or determine based on historical evidence and evaluation criteria, an alternate status code;
2. Adopt a resolution recommending to the Planning Commission, endorsement of the updated Central Waterfront Survey (California Department of Parks and Recreation Survey Forms (DPR 523L Update forms to previously endorsed DPR 523A and 523B forms) and;
3. Endorse the document entitled – Potrero Point Historic District DPR 523D record.
(Continued from 4/2/08)
Speaker(s):
Archie Green (Hearing tape 1a)
Mark Paez
Joe Boss
Greg Markoulis
Tim Kelley
Board Action
It was moved by Board member Cherny (seconded by Martinez) to approve the proposed resolution as amended. The vote was unanimous.
- (Requested that staff double check for accuracy the forms against the list) and;
- 2. to remove from the resolution #5 the following statement: is adopted by the San Francisco Landmarks Board , and to change #7 to state: The Planning department staff will further refine the documents and make factual edits as needed and will work with all property owners within the survey area to refine information as it comes forth.
AYES: Chan, Cherny, Damkroger, Dearman, Hasz, Maley, Martinez, Samaha
NOES: None
ABSENT: Street
It was moved by Board member Martinez (seconded by Cherny) to approve of endorsing the district records. The vote was unanimous.
AYES: Chan, Cherny, Damkroger, Dearman, Hasz, Maley, Martinez, Samaha
NOES: None
ABSENT: Street
Tape No: 2a and b
Board Member Cherny left the hearing at 4:00 p.m.
Board Member Chan left the hearing at 4:20 p.m.
NON-ACTION ITEM
INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION
12.
(David Beaupre: 415-274-0539 and Mark Paez: 415-705-8674)
- Asked if there would be legislation to create a new Transfer Development Rights district.
- Suggested looking into the new Market and Historic tax credits for funding alternatives.
- Requested the Project Sponsor return to the Landmarks Board so that the Board can make comment on the Context Statement and the National Register nomination.
ADJOURN: 4:30 P.M.
ADOPTED: June 4, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
Sonya Banks
Recording Secretary
I:\LPAB\MINUTES\5.7.08.doc
