To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

December 13, 2012 - Closed Session

SAN FRANCISCO

PLANNING COMMISSION

Meeting Minutes

Commission Chambers - Room 400

City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place

Thursday, December 13, 2012

     10:30 AM

Special Meeting

 

A.        CLOSED SESSION: 10:34 AM

 

1.         Public Comments on Matters to be discussed in Closed Session.

 

            SPEAKERS: Linda Chapman, Joe Butler

 

2.        Consider Adoption of Motion on Whether to Assert the Attorney-Client Privilege Regarding the Matters Listed Below as Conference With Legal Counsel. (San Francisco Administrative Code Section 67.10(d).) 

 

ACTION:     Approved Motion to Assert the Attorney-Client Privilege

AYES:        Fong, Wu, Antonini, Borden, Hillis, Moore, Sugaya

 

THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL GO INTO CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS THE FOLLOWING:

 

3.         Conference with Legal Counsel - Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(a) and San Francisco Administrative Code Section 67.10(d) to discuss pending litigation and consideration of settlement proposals in Pacific Polk Properties, LLC, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al., California Court of Appeal Case No. A133691, which was filed on November 10, 2011, and California-Nevada Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church v. City and County of San Francisco, United States District Court (N.D. Cal.) Case No. CV-11-2338 CW, which was filed on May 11, 2011; both lawsuits challenge, among other things, the Planning Commission’s June 24, 2010 failure to certify a final environmental impact report and denial of a conditional use authorization for a proposed project at 1601 Larkin Street.   (Kate Stacy and Tom Lakritz)

 

4.         Conference with Legal Counsel - Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(c) and San Francisco Administrative Code Section 67.10(d) to discuss enforcement and whether to initiate litigation with respect to the Academy of Art University.  Anticipated Litigation:  As Plaintiff.  (Office of the City Attorney)

 

FOLLOWING THE CLOSED SESSION, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION.

 

5.         Following the Closed Session, the Planning Commission will report on any action taken during the Closed Session and will consider a motion regarding whether to disclose any part of the discussions during Closed Session.

 

ACTION:     The Commission Approved a motion to not disclose the discussions during the Closed Session.

AYES:        Fong, Wu, Antonini, Borden, Hillis, Moore, Sugaya

 

 

Adjournment: 1:46 PM

 

Adopted: January 10, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Last updated: 1/15/2013 2:08:25 PM