November 9, 2006 special hearingFINAL ACTION MINUTES
OF THE
SAN FRANCISCO
LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING
SPECIAL HEARING
THE MISSION ARMORY
1800 Mission Street
November 9, 2006
2:15 P.M. ROLL CALL
FOR FULL LANDMARKS BOARD CONSIDERATION
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Cherny, Dearman, Hasz(arr. @ 2:20), Maley, Martinez, Street
BOARD MEMBER(S) ABSENT: Chan, Damkroger, Shatara
STAFF IN ATTENDANCE: Dan DiBartolo, Tim Frye, Rachel Force, Matt Weinstraub, Planning Staff Members, Sonya Banks, Commission Secretary
INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS
1. 2004.0547A (T. FRYE: 415/575-6822)
MISSION ARMORY, 1800 Mission Street – Assessor's Block 3547 Lot 001 Bounded by 14th and Julian Streets. Informational presentation at project site and tour of the property with Project Sponsor, Architect of Record, and Preservation Consultant to discuss the proposed project to convert the subject property into office and residential space. The proposed project includes new construction within the Drill Court, a vertical rooftop addition, exterior restoration, and limited interior restoration in the Administration Building.
Speaker(s):
Rick Disnakia
Rich Sucre
Andres Grechi
Chris VerPlanck
Winchell Hayward
Toby Levine
Tim Colen
Michael Levin
Phillip Lesser
Sarah Jones
Board Comments:
The Board Members questions included: whether the wood flooring would be retained, whether there is wooden flooring under the tile, if parking spaces will be located in the basement, if the bricks will be waterproofed, the floor to ceiling height for the penthouse, whether the elevator will go above the penthouse level, whether the entrance and exit gates will be locked, whether a security guard will be provided. A Board Member also asked if the metal frame of the drill court roof would be treated or could it be weatherproofed. A Board Member suggested that the proposed penthouses may be too large and that the proposed infill in the drill court may not be compatible because it appears to be a demolition due to the loss of the historic fabric. Will the brick wall around the drill court needs structural upgrading and if the project sponsors had looked into fiber reinforced polymers or structural wallpaper for the terracotta tile. A Board Member recommended displaying a historic plaque and artifacts on the history of the building. One Board member suggested that this may be an inappropriate project, an inappropriate solution, and unfriendly for residential use.
ADJOURNMENT: 3:44 pm
Respectfully Submitted,
Sonya Banks,
Recording Secretary
ADOPTED: December 6, 2006
N:\LPAB\MINUTES\m11.09.06.doc