June 18, 2003FINAL ACTION MINUTES
OF THE
SAN FRANCISCO
LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING
CITY HALL
1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE, ROOM 400
JUNE 18, 2003
12:32 P.M. ROLL CALL
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
MEMBERS PRESENT: FINWALL, KELLEY and SHATARA
MEMBER(S) ABSENT: KOTAS
333 DOLORES STREET, Notre Dame Plaza, is on the east side between 16th and 17th Streets. Assessor's Block 3567, Lot 57, a portion of City Landmark 137. The entire 2.6 acre site formerly identified as Assessor's block 3567, Lot 31 was designated a landmark site in 1981. In 1995, the sisters of the Notre Dame subdivided the property into two irregular lots to allow for the sale of the former Notre Dame School Building to Mercy Charities Housing and the Saint Joseph's Hall Building and playground to the Children's Day School. The subdivision of the property did not affect the landmark status of the site. The Children's Day School is located in the Saint Joseph's Hall Building, a three-story reinforced concrete building with stucco exterior and associated playground/open space. The structure is situated behind the Notre Dame Plaza Senior Housing Complex which fronts on Dolores Street. The property is located in a RM-1 (Mixed, Residential, Low Density) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District. Request for the Architectural Review Committee to review and comment on a proposal to construct three temporary classroom buildings for the Children Day School.
ARC comments and recommendations:
Speaker(s): Patrick McGrew
- It was suggested that the school use an Airstream trailers.
- Some conditions should be put on the project in terms of timeline.
- Creating more planting around the portable classrooms was suggested.
Tape No(s).: 1a
ADJOURNMENT
1:10 P.M. ROLL CALL
FOR FULL BOARD CONSIDERATION
MEMBERS PRESENT: FINWALL, HO-BELLI, KELLEY, SHATARA and SKRONDAL
MEMBER(S) ABSENT: CHERNY, DEARMAN, KOTAS and SAMUELS
PUBLIC COMMENT
David Armillie re: A house at 151 Beaver Street and its historic significance
REPORTS
1. STAFF REPORT AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Tape No(s).: 1a
REGULAR CALENDAR ITEMS
Discussion
Certificate(s) of Appropriateness
Speaker(s): Dan Weaver
Charles Chase
John Funghi (sp.)
Charlie Duncan
Action: It was moved by Member Skrondal (seconded by Finwall) to recommend approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness based on Staff Findings. The vote was unanimous.
Ayes: Finwall, Ho-Belli, Kelley, Shatara and Skrondal
Noes: None
Absent: Cherny, Dearman, Kotas and Samuels
Tape No(s).: 1a & b
34 HILL STREET, north side between Guerrero Street and Valencia Street. Assessor's Block 3617, Lot 57. A contributory structure to the Liberty Hill Historic District, this Italianate style house was also included in Here Today and the Planning Department's 1976 architectural survey. The house was constructed as a single-family house and is currently used as a single-family house. The house is within an RH-3 (House, Three-family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District. Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter a portion of the rear of the house to change an enclosed sitting room to an open porch.
Speaker(s): Clint Mitchell
Action: It was moved by Member Finwall (seconded by Skrondal) to recommend approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness based on Staff Findings. The vote was unanimous.
Ayes: Finwall, Ho-Belli, Kelley, Shatara and Skrondal
Noes: None
Absent: Cherny, Dearman, Kotas and Samuels
Tape No(s).: 1b
Review and Comment
Speaker(s): Larry Mock
Board
Comments:
- The Landmarks Board believed that removing the brick portion of the left side of the façade to provide a new entry recess and storefront and enclosing the existing recess on the right side of the building could be deemed appropriate and consistent with Article 10 of the Planning Code, as well as the Secretary of the Interior's Standards.
- Commented that they understood the programmatic and circulation constrains of the interior that were forcing the reestablishment of the entry to the left side of the building. However, the Landmarks Board felt that instead of simply using plate glass for the storefronts, the project sponsor should consider a heavier timber sash window system to provide more visual eight. Such a design modification would mitigate the removal of the brick surface, which provides the building with a sense of solid, heavy mass, typical of warehouse structures in the South End Historic District.
- The Landmarks Board also suggested moving the reception desk further away from the window to provide a stronger sense of transparency.
Tape No(s).: 1b
ADJOURNMENT: 2:55 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION COMMITTEE
ROLL CALL: Chair: Jeremy Kotas
Ex-Officio: Tim Kelley
REPORT
CHAIR'S REPORT AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
N/A
PUBLIC COMMENT
ADJOURNMENT
Adopted: August 20, 2003
N:\LPAB\MINUTES\ JUNE 18 2003 FIN.MIN