April 16, 2003FINAL ACTION MINUTES
OF THE
SAN FRANCISCO
LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING
CITY HALL
1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE, ROOM 400
APRIL 16, 2003
12:05 P.M. ROLL CALL
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
MEMBERS PRESENT: FINWALL, KELLEY and SHATARA
MEMBER(S) ABSENT: KOTAS
893 WISCONSIN STREET, The Kerrigan House-Ruth Cravath Stoneyard, Landmark No. 148, east side between 22nd and 23rd Streets. Assessor's Block 162, Lot 57. This single-family house was built in 1905 in the Bay Area Craftsman Bungalow domestic architecture style and was the home and studio of renowned sculptor, Ruth Cravath, between the years of 1958 to 1981. The house is also listed in the Planning Department's 1976 Architectural Survey. The subject property is zoned within an RH-2 (House, Two-family) District and is in a 40-X Height and Bulk District. Request for the Architectural Review Committee comment on a proposal to remove a rear second story addition constructed in 1988 and construction of a new larger rear second story addition.
ARC comments and recommendations:
Speaker(s): Arnie Lerner
- In a photo that was displayed, it was asked, what is the original fabric in the rear elevation?
- Asked about the dimensional change in the shingles.
- Commented that the scale of the addition is troubling.
- Suggested varying the pattern of shingles.
- Suggested placing a panel (or water table) on the bottom below the windows to break up the mass of the dormer.
- Work with Staff on suggested changes.
Tape No(s).: 1a
ADJOURNMENT
12:32 P.M. ROLL CALL
FOR FULL BOARD CONSIDERATION
MEMBERS PRESENT: CHERNY, FINWALL, HO-BELLI, KELLEY and SHATARA
MEMBER(S) ABSENT: DEARMAN, KOTAS, SAMUELS and SKRONDAL
PUBLIC COMMENT
Alan Martinez re: AIA of San Francisco Chapter, support for potential landmark buildings (the Music Concourse, the Church of Jesus Christ on Sutter Street, the Conservatory of Music and the Samuel Gompers School)
Christopher Duderstadt, speaking on behalf of the Alliance for Golden Gate Park and San Francisco Tomorrow re: Thanks to the Landmarks Board for their comments on the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority Projects (garage) Draft EIR
REPORTS
1. STAFF REPORT AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Tape No(s).: 1a
REGULAR CALENDAR ITEMS
Informational Presentation
Tape No(s).: 1a & b
Review and Comment - EIR
CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES PROJECT, Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). The California Academy of Sciences (CAS) is in Golden Gate Park, Assessor's Block 1700, Lot 1, along the easterly edge of the Music Concourse within a P (Public Use) District and an OS (Open Space) Height and Bulk District. The project would be to build a new CAS (Academy) on the site of the existing facilities. The project would include demolition of 11 of the existing 12 buildings, and the removal of approximately 73 existing parking spaces. The project would retain and rehabilitate Simson African Hall in place. The Academy would retain its general location and orientation. The new facility would include three main levels above grade, two levels below grade, and a loading area at the southwestern portion of the project site. The new Academy building would be approximately 460 feet long and 280 feet wide, with the edges of the roof extending to approximately 520 feet long by 335 feet wide. The building would feature a landscaped roof, the base height of which would be less than 40 feet. Above the base, the landscaped roof would undulate to accommodate the Academy's major programmatic components beneath, with the two peak elements over the planetarium and rainforest exhibits reaching a height of about 67 feet, or approximately 13 feet beyond the highest existing point (Morrison Planetarium). These two peaks would be set back approximately 150 feet from the roof's edge along Academy Drive. Trellised portions of the roof would extend beyond the perimeter walls. The floor area would increase from approximately 350,000 sq. ft. to approximately 390,000 sq. ft. The footprint would decrease from approximately 240,000 sq. ft. to approximately 205,500 sq. ft. This increase in area on a smaller footprint is possible because the plans significantly increase basement level areas. The purpose of the hearing is to facilitate the formulation of the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board's comments on the adequacy of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the proposed project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Speaker(s): Gordon Chung
Board
Comments:
- The Landmarks Board concurred that the description of the project is adequate and accurate in the Report.
- The Landmarks Board concurred that the project would have no negative effect on visual qualities of the project.
- The HABS recordation should be extended to the entire assembly as a mitigation/improvement.
- Encouraged the maximum, feasible reuse of existing fabric and specifically encourage the retention of the star projector on site.
- Finds that Chapter 5 (p. 178), Significant Environmental Effects that Cannot be Avoided, to be adequate.
- Basically, the Landmarks Board concurs with the findings of the Draft EIR, with the exception of the additions as noted regarding the reuse of fabric and the star projector.
Tape No(s).: 1b
Informational Presentation
6. 2002.0809E (AHMADI: 558-5966)
Tape No(s).: 1b
Review and Comment - Section 106
7. 2002.0809F (M. CORRETTE: 415/558-6295)
VALENCIA GARDENS HOPE VI PUBLIC HOUSING PROJECT. The project site is located at 340-370 Valencia Street, west side of Valencia Street, north side of 15th Street, and the east side of Guerrero Street. Assessor's Block 3546, Lot 2. The proposed project involves the demolition of the Valencia Gardens public housing project (246 units). The project also proposes the new construction of up to 290 public housing units; a community center (5,400 sq. ft.); a child care center (3,500 sq. ft.); a computer learning center (3,000 sq. ft.); an outdoor child play space (2,300 sq. ft.); other semi-public community open space; and 86 surface parking spaces. The Mayor's Office of Housing is conducting a section 106 review of the proposed project, and has requested the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board (Landmarks Board) to review and comment on the materials it has prepared for the section 106 review. A letter containing the comments of the Landmarks Board will be addressed to the Director of Planning. The Director will then forward the comments of the Landmarks Board and the comments of the Planning Department to the lead Federal Agency (Department of Housing and Urban Development), and send copies to the California Office of Historic Preservation, Mayor's Office of Housing, and any other interested parties.
Speaker(s): Kenneth Jones
Board
Comments:
Tape No(s).: 1b & 2a
Review and Comment - EIR
Tape No(s).: 2a
Review and Comment - PA
Speaker(s): None
Board
Comments:
- The Landmarks Board stated that they find the proposed process to be substantially similar to the existing process, and agrees that the Section 106 review process will be streamlined by allowing Caltrans staff to consult directly with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and to transmit materials directly to the SHPO.
Tape No(s).: 2a
Certificate(s) of Appropriateness
Speaker(s): None
Action: It was moved by Member Shatara (seconded by Finwall) to recommend approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness based on Staff Findings. The vote was unanimous.
Ayes: Cherny, Finwall, Ho-Belli, Kelley and Shatara
Noes: None
Absent: Dearman, Kotas, Samuels and Skrondal
Tape No(s).: 2a
ADJOURNMENT: 3:30 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION COMMITTEE
ROLL CALL: Chair: Jeremy Kotas
Ex-Officio: Tim Kelley
REPORT
CHAIR'S REPORT AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
N/A
PUBLIC COMMENT
ADJOURNMENT
Adopted: August 20, 2003
N:\LPAB\MINUTES\ APRIL 16 2003 FIN.MIN