To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body
December 04, 2002

FINAL ACTION MINUTES
OF THE
SAN FRANCISCO
LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING

CITY HALL

1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE, ROOM 400

DECEMBER 4, 2002

12:40 P.M. ROLL CALL

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE

MEMBERS PRESENT: FINWALL, KELLEY and KOTAS

MEMBER(S) ABSENT: PEARLMAN and SHATARA

  • 1. 2002.0925A (W. HASTIE: 415/558-6381)

    639-699 2ND STREET, east Side between Brannan and Townsend Streets. Assessor's Block 3789, Lots 4 and 5. Constructed in 1882, the California Warehouse is a concrete and brick building that was originally a storage warehouse and is now used as office space. The property is contributory to the South End Historic District, is separately listed in the National Register of Historic Places, is a rated building in the South of Market Area Plan, has a "B" rating from Heritage, and is listed in the UMB Survey. The subject property is zoned SSO (Service/Secondary Office) and is in a 50-X Height and Bulk District. Request for Architectural Review Committee review and comment on a proposal to construct a horizontal and vertical addition to create 111 dwelling units.

    ARC comments and recommendations:

    Speaker(s): Jared Eigerman

    David Sternberg

    Charles Chase

    Douglas Rosenberg

  • Commented that there are problems with the scale.

  • Color is key to the historic building.

  • Concerned with the loss of retail space.

  • Proposed plan does not include street trees.

  • Suggested that project sponsor continue in dialog with Planning Staff and Heritage.

Tape No(s).: 1a

  • 2. 2002.1042A (K. SIMONSON: 415/558-6321)

    890 GROVE STREET, north side between Fillmore Street and Webster Street. Assessor's Block 797, Lot 19. 890 Grove is a two-story, shingle-clad Edwardian building, built circa 1917. It is a 19-room bed and breakfast inn. The building contributes to the Alamo Square Historic District, is included in the 1976 Architectural Survey, and is within an RH-3 (House, Three-Family) District, and a 50-X Height and Bulk District. Request for Architectural Review Committee on the proposal to construct a third floor addition on the roof of the existing building, containing approximately 1,980 square feet, for use as an owner's apartment; to construct an elevator and stair addition on the west facade; to construct a stair addition on the east facade; and to add a 4-car garage in the north portion of the basement.

    ARC comments and recommendations:

    Speaker(s): Mark Topetcher

    Claus Zimmerman

  • One member of the ARC commented that the addition is very prominent and would overwhelm the existing building.

  • One member of the ARC commented that the proposed project was not consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.

  • One member of the ARC commented that the proposed addition would result in a loss of integrity for the historic resource.

  • One member of the ARC commented that they found the proposed project to be attractive and felt it would be a good fit for the neighborhood.

  • A couple of members of the ARC expressed support of the proposed project because the facades of the existing building would be left intact.

  • It was suggested that the project sponsor have Alamo Square Neighborhood Association review the project and provide comments.

Tape No(s).: 1a & b

ADJOURNMENT: 2:00 P.M.

2:15 P.M. ROLL CALL

FOR FULL BOARD CONSIDERATION

MEMBERS PRESENT: FINWALL, KELLEY, KOTAS, PICON and SKRONDAL

MEMBER(S) ABSENT: DEARMAN, HO-BELLI and SHATARA

PUBLIC COMMENT

None.

REPORTS

1. STAFF REPORT AND ANNOUNCEMENTS

Neil Hart, Chief

Neighborhood Planning:

  • Discussed his trip to Australia and his victories (silver -1500 meter freestyle and bronze - 800 meter freestyle medals).

  • Thanked Preservation Technical Staff for covering the hearings in his absence.

  • Informed the Landmarks Board and members of the public of the transitions taking place on the Landmarks Board - Board Member Jonathan Pearlman has resigned and Board Member Theresa Picon is moving on to the Film & Video Commission.

  • Announced that the December 18th Landmarks Board hearing is canceled; the next hearing will be held on January 15, 2003. Elections of Officers will take place at that hearing.

  • A holiday dinner party has been scheduled for Tuesday, December 17, 2001.

2. PRESIDENT'S REPORT AND ANNOUNCEMENTS

President Kelley:

  • Expressed regrets of the loss of Board Members Pearlman and Picon and thanked them for their service to the Landmarks Board.

  • He continues to have on-going discussions with owners of three buildings in Japantown regarding potential landmark status.

3. MATTERS OF THE BOARD

None.

Tape No(s).: 1a

REGULAR CALENDAR ITEMS

  • Section 106 Review

4. 2002.0439F (K. SIMONSON: 415/558-6321)

DOYLE DRIVE REPLACEMENT, southern approach of US 101 to the Golden Gate

Bridge, Assessor's Block 1300, within the City of San Francisco, and the Presidio of San Francisco, part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area. Project limits extend eastward along Doyle Drive for approximately 1.1 miles, from the Park Presidio Interchange to the proposed Presidio National Park Access in the vicinity of Girard Road. East of Girard Road, improvements would be made to Richardson Avenue in the vicinity of Lyon and Francisco Street under selected alternatives. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), is conducting a Section 106 Review of the proposed replacement of Doyle Drive. The Focused Area of Potential Effect (APE) includes the Palace of Fine Arts, Doyle Drive, San Francisco National Cemetery, Park Presidio Boulevard, Richardson Avenue, and the cultural landscape and 270 historic resources in the Presidio National Historic Landmark District. At this time, Caltrans is seeking comments on the Historic Architecture Survey Report, dated August 29, 2002. The Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board (Landmarks Board) will, as a consulting party in the Section 106 review process, review and comment on the Historic Architecture Survey Report. A letter containing the comments of the Landmarks Board will be sent to the Director of Planning. The Director will then forward the comments of the Landmarks Board and the comments of the Planning Department to the State Historic Preservation Officer.

Speaker(s): Elizabeth Krase

Board

Comments:

  • The Landmarks Board concur with the description of the undertaking, the boundaries of the focused Area of Potential Effect (APE), and the assessment of eligibility of historic resources in the APE, including the Presidio National Historic Landmark District, the Palace of Fine Arts, and the Marina.

  • The Landmarks Board thanked Caltrans staff for providing additional material.

Tape No(s).: 1b

  • Informational Presentation

5. 2002.0805E (C. ROOS: 415/558-5981)

MID-MARKET REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). The Project Area includes 14 Assessor's Blocks in part or in their entirety: 341, 342, 350, 355 (North of Market), 3507, 3508, 3509, 3701, 3702, 3703, 3704, 3725, 3727, and 3738 (South of Market); the Special Use District (SUD) also includes Assessor's Block 351 (North of Market). A background informational presentation on the proposed San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (SFRA), Mid-Market Redevelopment Plan (Mid-Market Plan) and a Mid-Market SUD zoning overlay. The proposed Mid-Market Redevelopment Project Area (Project Area), located in downtown San Francisco, generally from Fifth Street to Tenth Street along the Market and Mission Streets corridor. The Mid-Market Plan is a 30-year program that would authorize the SFRA to participate in certain projects and programs to help alleviate blighting conditions in the Project Area. It is proposed as an incremental, urban infill and rehabilitation program for private properties and public facilities within the Project Area. The proposed Mid-Market Plan is designed to encourage and assist in the development of a more land-use intensive mixed-use district than currently exists with emphasis on increasing residential development; expanding existing arts, cultural and entertainment activities; aiding existing businesses and attracting new commercial development; and rehabilitating existing commercial and residential space in historic buildings. The SFRA has identified potential development sites in the Project Area, which provide a development scenario. They include Development Opportunity sites and Rehabilitation Opportunity sites. Development sites include vacant sites, parking lots, and sites that would be developed after existing buildings were demolished. Development Sites might include new construction, accompanied by retention and re-use of structures, or portions of structures, of historic or architectural merit. Because specific projects for Development Opportunity Sites are not identified in this program DEIR, it is not know, at this time, if buildings of historic or architectural merit would be affected. The DEIR assumes, conservatively, that such resources could be affected. Rehabilitation Sites include buildings that are considered to have architectural merit or are otherwise suitable for rehabilitation and re-use without major new construction on the site. Plan implementation would include about 5,970,000 square feet of new and rehabilitated space; including about 2,890,000 square feet of housing, 1,200,000 square feet of office space, 548,000 square feet of parking, 106,000 square feet of institutional space, 394,000 square feet of retail space, 385,000 square feet of hotel use, and 351,500 square feet of theater and art space. The overall development assumed in the Mid-Market Plan would occur over a 30-year time period. The DEIR analyzes overall changes in land use in the Project Area for the year 2020. It does not assume detailed plans for specific development sites.

Speaker(s): Lisa King

Janet Carpinelli

Anthony Faber

David Siegel

Board

Comments:

  • Asked how were the Sites of Opportunity determined?

  • Thanked Redevelopment staff for the informational presentation.

Tape No(s).: 1b & 2a

  • Review and Comment

6. 2002.0805E (C. ROOS: 415/558-5981)

MID-MARKET REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). The Project Area includes 14 Assessor's Blocks in part or in their entirety: 341, 342, 350, 355 (North of Market), 3507, 3508, 3509, 3701, 3702, 3703, 3704, 3725, 3727, and 3738 (South of Market); the Special Use District (SUD) also includes Assessor's Block 351 (North of Market). The San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (SFRA) proposes a Mid-Market Redevelopment Plan (Mid-Market Plan) and a Mid-Market SUD zoning overlay. The proposed Mid-Market Redevelopment Project Area (Project Area), located in downtown San Francisco, generally from Fifth Street to Tenth Street along the Market and Mission Streets corridor. The Mid-Market Plan is a 30-year program that would authorize the SFRA to participate in certain projects and programs to help alleviate blighting conditions in the Project Area. It is proposed as an incremental, urban infill and rehabilitation program for private properties and public facilities within the Project Area. The proposed Mid-Market Plan is designed to encourage and assist in the development of a more land-use intensive mixed-use district than currently exists with emphasis on increasing residential development; expanding existing arts, cultural and entertainment activities; aiding existing businesses and attracting new commercial development; and rehabilitating existing commercial and residential space in historic buildings. The SFRA has identified potential development sites in the Project Area, which provide a development scenario. They include Development Opportunity sites and Rehabilitation Opportunity sites. Development sites include vacant sites, parking lots, and sites that would be developed after existing buildings were demolished. Development Sites might include new construction, accompanied by retention and re-use of structures, or portions of structures, of historic or architectural merit. Because specific projects for Development Opportunity Sites are not identified in this program DEIR, it is not know, at this time, if buildings of historic or architectural merit would be affected. The DEIR assumes, conservatively, that such resources could be affected. Rehabilitation Sites include buildings that are considered to have architectural merit or are otherwise suitable for rehabilitation and re-use without major new construction on the site. Plan implementation would include about 5,970,000 square feet of new and rehabilitated space; including about 2,890,000 square feet of housing, 1,200,000 square feet of office space, 548,000 square feet of parking, 106,000 square feet of institutional space, 394,000 square feet of retail space, 385,000 square feet of hotel use, and 351,500 square feet of theater and art space. The overall development assumed in the Mid-Market Plan would occur over a 30-year time period. The DEIR analyzes overall changes in land use in the Project Area for the year 2020. It does not assume detailed plans for specific development sites. The purpose of the hearing is to facilitate the formulation of the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board's comments on the adequacy of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the proposed project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Speaker(s): Lisa King

Board

Comments:

  • Commented that the DEIR does not identify historic buildings very well.

  • The DEIR is not complete enough.

  • Alleyways should be an integral part of the project.

Tape No(s).: 2a

  • Historic District Designation

7. 2002.0775L (W. HASTIE: 415/558-6381)

DOGPATCH HISTORIC DISTRICT, an area bounded by Mariposa Street to the north, Minnesota Street to the west, Tubbs Street to the south, and 3rd Street to the east. Including Assessor's Block 3996: Lots 004, 005, 006, 007; Block 4043: Lots 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 005A, 006, 011B, 014, 015, 016; Block 4060: Lots 001, 004, 006-063; Block 4106: Lots 001A, 002, 003, 004, 005, 005A, 006, 007, 008, 009, 009A, 010, 011, 012, 013, 014, 015; Block 4107: Lots 001B, 002A, 002B, 002C, 002E, 002F, 002G, 002H, 002I, 002J, 002K, 002L, 002M, 002N, 003, 0004, 005, 006, 007, 008, 009, 010, 011, 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 017, 018, 019, 020, 021, 022, 023, 026-057; Block 4108: Lots 001, 003A, 003C, 003D, 003E, 003G, 003H, 003O, 003P, 004, 005, 006, 008, 009, 010, 011, 012, 013, 014, 014A, 015, 017, 018, 019, 020, 021; Block 4171: Lots 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007, 014, 015, 017; Block 4172: Lots 001, 002, 003, 015, 016, 018, 018A, 019, 020, 021, 025, 027, 028, 029, 032, 034, 034A, 034B, 035, 036, 041, 044-046, 047, 048, 049, 050, 051, 052, 053. The district encompasses several zoning districts, including: RH-2 (Residential, Two-Family), RH-3 (Residential, Three-Family), NC-2 (Small-Scale Neighborhood Commercial), M-2 (Heavy Industrial), and P (Public Use) districts. Request for the Landmark Preservation Advisory Board's recommendation to the Planning Commission on the proposed Dogpatch Historic District designating ordinance, which was introduced by the Board of Supervisors on November 12, 2002 as File No. 021476. This ordinance would create Appendix L to Article 10 of the Planning Code.

Speaker(s): Janet Carpinelli

David Siegel

Board

Actions and

Comments:

  • After hearing public comments, Board Member Finwall moved (seconded by Picon) to recommend approval of the proposed Dogpatch Historic District designating ordinance, based on Staff recommendation. The vote was unanimous -Finwall, Kelley, Kotas, Picon and Skrondal; absent: Dearman, Ho-Belli and Shatara.

Tape No(s).: 2a

  • Certificate(s) of Appropriateness

8. 2002.1037A (W. HASTIE: 415/558-6381)

750 2ND STREET, west side between Townsend and King Streets. Assessor's Block 3794, Lot 2A. The concrete building is non-contributory to the South End Historic District. The subject property is zoned M-2 (Heavy Industrial) District and is in a 105-F Height and Bulk District. Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove existing plywood panels which cover windows at the mezzanine level, to replace two roll-up garage doors with fixed wood window units to match existing, and to install a new, paired door wood entry system at the north bay opening.

Speaker(s): None

Action: It was moved by Member Kotas (seconded by Finwall) to recommend approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness based on Staff Findings. The vote was unanimous.

Ayes: Finwall, Kelley, Kotas, Picon and Skrondal

Noes: None

Absent: Dearman, Ho-Belli and Shatara

Tape No(s).: 2a

ADJOURNMENT: 4:00 P.M.

PUBLIC COMMUNICATION COMMITTEE

ROLL CALL: Chair: Jeremy Kotas

Ex-Officio: Tim Kelley

Committee Members: Ina Dearman, Paul Finwall, Elizabeth Skrondal

No quorum.

REPORT

CHAIR'S REPORT AND ANNOUNCEMENTS

N/A

PUBLIC COMMENT

N/A

ADJOURNMENT

Adopted: March 19, 2003

  • N:\LPAB\MINUTES\ DECEMBER04FIN.MIN

Last updated: 11/17/2009 9:59:40 PM