NOTE: On April 21, 2005, following public testimony, the Commission
closed the public hearing and entertained a motion to not take Discretionary
Review and approve the project. The motion failed with a +3-2 vote (Commissioners
Hughes and Olague voted no and Commissioners Alexander and Bradford
Bell were absent). Subsequently, the matter was continued to April 28,
2005 by a +5-0 vote (Commissioners Alexander and Bradford Bell were
absent. Public comment will remain open only to address any new or modified
information or material.
SPEAKER(S): None
MOTION No. 1: Hearing Held. Continue to May 5, 2005.
AYES: Alexander and Hughes,
NAYES: Antonini, S. Lee, W. Lee, Olague
ABSENT: Bradford Bell
RESULT: Motion Failed
MOTION No. 2: Take Discretionary Review and Disapprove Merger
AYES: Alexander, Hughes, Olague
NAYES: Antonini, S. Lee, W. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford Bell
RESULT: Motion Failed
ACTION: Hearing Held. Public hearing closed. Item continued to May
5, 2005 to allow the absent commissioner the opportunity to participate.
AYES: Alexander, Hughes, Olague
NAYES: Antonini, S. Lee, W. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford Bell
16. 2005.0226DDDD (S. VELLVE: (415) 558-6263)
60 CLARENDON AVENUE - north side between the Stanyan Street
right-of-way and Twin Peaks Boulevard; Lot 023 in Assessor's Block 2688
- Requests for Discretionary Review and staff-initiated Discretionary
Review of Building Permit Application No. 2004.04.22.2053 proposing
to construct a new single-family dwelling on a steeply down-sloping
vacant lot. The house would be two stories at the street frontage and
five stories at the rear in an RH-1(D) (House, One-Family (Detached
Dwelling)) District and 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Take Discretionary Review and approve
the project with modifications
(Continued from Regular Meeting of April 14, 2005)
SPEAKER(S):
(-) David Levy - Representing 1st Discretionary Review
Requestor
- They appreciate the changes that the project sponsor has agreed to.
- They appreciate the fact that the project sponsor put up story poles,
although some of the story poles were not accurate.
- This project should receive substantial modifications. The size of
the property is too large and it does not comply with the Residential
Design Guidelines. It does not meet the requirements of the Planning
Code. The building does not step down the hill; it would diminish light
and air; etc.
- They request that the Commission take Discretionary Review and either
deny the project or request modifications so that the project complies
with the Residential Design Guidelines.
(-) Katherine Woof - 2nd Discretionary Review Requestor
- She reviewed the changes to the existing plans and is in accordance
with [most] of it. She still wants five feet to be removed from each
level.
(-) Mr. Zeneli - 3rd Discretionary Review Requestor
- He knew that there were two legal easements recorded.
- The proposed building will put his house into a tunnel like situation.
(-) Arnold Rockford
- He lives on Clarendon Street.
- His main issues are the height and bulk of the building.
(-) Lawrence Ruff
- He is concerned about this project because the scope and scale is
not compatible with the neighborhood.
- He is concerned with the diminished light and air and how that will
affect him.
- The project sponsor should further reduce the height of the building.
(-) Richard Margaise
- He is opposed to the project because it is a "monster"
home and is out of character with the neighborhood.
- He is surprised that the Planning Department would consider a plan
that violates easements.
(+) Jim Reuben - Reuben and Junius
- This is a completely code compliant project.
- There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances here.
- The lot is very small and extremely slopes down hill. It is difficult
to have enough space on each floor.
- There have been a lot of discussions and negotiations.
(+) (did not state name)
- He has known the project sponsor for many years.
- The project will provide much-need housing for the City.
- The project sponsor is a great builder.
- There have been several changes to the plans since the project sponsor
met with several of the neighbors.
(+) Mark McCoin
- He agrees with the previous speaker.
- When the neighbors see what type of quality building this will be,
they will agree with the project.
(+) Lou Barberini
- The project will fit into the neighborhood and actually enhance it.
(+) (did not state name)
- The project sponsor has helped him with many projects and is not
a liar either.
(+) Lou Balance
- The work that the project sponsor does is excellent craftsmanship.
- The project on Clarendon will be quality craftsmanship as well.
(+) Brian McGee
- The project sponsor is constructing a code-compliant building.
- The Commission should consider that the project sponsor has come
a long way.
(+) Greg Clark
- He is a fourth-generation San Franciscan.
- He looked at the legal documents regarding the easement and he did
not understand it.
- This project will be a hope that a family can live in.
- It is not right to limit a person to provide space to live in instead
of living in boxes.
ACTION: Took Discretionary Review and approved the project per staff
recommendations: Require a three foot setback at each floor; a three
foot side setback at lower crawl space, remove stair penthouse and provide
a hatch.
AYES: Alexander, Antonini, Hughes, W. Lee
NAYES: S. Lee and Olague
ABSENT: Bradford Bell
17. 2005.0262D (J. IONIN: (415) 558-6309)
22 JORDAN AVENUE - east side between California and Euclid Streets;
Lot 035 in Assessor's Block 1038 - Request for Discretionary Review
of Permit Application No. 2004.09.01.3170, proposing to construct rear
additions to the existing single-family dwelling at the first and third
levels. The ground floor rear addition would extend the rear building
wall approximately six feet and the third floor rear addition would
extend the third level rear building wall approximately 13 feet 6 inches.
Both additions would be set back three feet from the north side property
line in an RH-1(D) (Single-family Residential, Detached) District and
a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve
as proposed.
SPEAKER(S):
(-) Jeremy Paul - Representing Discretionary Review Requestor
- He does not agree with staff's report.
- The proposal is not code compliant and requires multiple variances.
- The site conditions are not discussed in the project report.
- Lot coverage is made irrelevant; therefore, plans are inaccurate
and misleading.
(-) Sara Estroquen
- It is an unfortunate beginning for a neighbor-to-neighbor relationship.
- The proposed expansion would detract form the character of the neighborhood.
- The area of their home where they spend the most time is the one
that will be most affected by the proposed construction.
(+) Nigel Burns - Project Sponsor
- He wants to do a very modest project.
- He would like to construct a master bath and a kitchen on the ground
floor.
- The concerns of the Discretionary Review requestor are of air and
light and the suggestions by staff would decrease that impact.
(+) Sherril Cooper Burns
- She and her husband were delighted to find this house.
- They have small children and having more space will allow them to
live there for many years.
- Her mom and her husband's parents will be staying with them for extended
periods of time.
ACTION: Take Discretionary Review and approve with modifications by
flipping the third floor horizontal addition and deck from the north
side of the single-family residence to the south side and vice versa.
AYES: Alexander, Antonini, Hughes, S. Lee, W. Lee, Olague
ABSENT: Bradford Bell
18. 2004.1310DD (G. NELSON: (415) 558-6257)
1260 FUNSTON AVENUE (AKA 13TH AVENUE) - east side between
Lincoln Way and Irving Street; Lot 031 in Assessor's Block 1738 - Requests
for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2004.09.27.5238
proposing to construct a three-story addition at the rear of a two-story
single-family dwelling in an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) District,
and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve
project as modified.
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Without hearing, item continued to May 12, 2005
AYES: Alexander, Antonini, Hughes, S. Lee, W. Lee, Olague
ABSENT: Bradford Bell