693 SUTTER - southeast corner at Taylor Street; Lot 009 in Assessor's Block 0297 - Off-street parking variance sought. The proposal is to convert approximately 7,000 square feet of office space on the fifth and sixth floors of the existing building to six dwelling units. There will be no physical expansion of the existing building. The project site lies within a C-3-G (Downtown General Commercial) District and an 80-130-F Height and Bulk District. The parking requirement for the proposed project is two spaces, and the project is proposing zero spaces. The application for variance will be considered by the Zoning Administrator.
SPEAKER(S): Same as those listed in item 14a.
ACTION: Zoning Administrator continued the Item to April 28, 2005.
15a. 2002.0805RTZ (M. FOSTER (415) 558-6362)
MID-MARKET REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL USE DISTRICT - Assessor's Blocks 0341; 0342; 0350; 0351, lot 035; 0355; 3507, lot 039; 3508; 3509, lots 002, 018, 019, 036, 037, 040, 041, 042, and 043; 3510, lot 001; 3701; 3702, excluding lots 015, 016, 029, 031, 032, 033, 034, 035, 036, 055, and 056 (eastern portion); 3703, excluding lots 004, 005, 006, 027, 028, and 029; 3704, lots 025, 026, 049, 050, 051, 052, and 053; 3725, lots 078, 082, 086, 087, 088, 089, 090, 091, and 093; 3727, lots 001, 091, 094, 096, 097, 101, 102, 103, 109, 117, 118, 120, 130, 134, 168, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, and Block 3728, lots 001, 072, 075, 076, 081, 082, 083, 089, and 103. The Commission will consider a Motion of Intent to Initiate Amendments to the Planning Code pursuant to the proposed Mid-Market Redevelopment Plan and Special Use District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Adopt a Motion of Intent to Initiate Amendments to the Planning Code.
SPEAKER(S):
(+) Lisa Zayas Chien - Planner at the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency
- The agency has been contemplating this area since 1994.
- They have been working with a citizen's advisory committee.
- The project area was selected in 1997.
- The project area committee consists of various neighborhood residents that have an interest in what is happening there.
- The agency has gone through a lot to listen and gather the resident's comments and issues.
- This is a very interesting project that brings together various issues.
(+) Anthony Faber - SOMA Leadership
- This initiation should be approved to get the "ball rolling" in order to see what the Commission likes and doesn't like.
(+/-) Susan Bryant
- She has met with several groups and they feel that it is a bit early for initialization.
- The community still has concerns like: housing, more Inclusionary housing, transportation, arts, etc.
- There is a lot more community outreach that should be done.
(+/-) Jakkee Bryson
- Her question is: "What is the rush?"
- Can the arts money be used to expand the building?
(+) Sam Duke
- She pleaded with the Commission to start this now.
- This has been worked on for so long and no one is rushing.
- The PAC meets every week and the main body meets once a month. This project should start.
(-) Robert Ingalls
- He has been living in San Francisco all his life.
- He wants to continue living here even if he has to live in substandard conditions.
(-) Bill Murphy
- He is a third generation San Franciscan living in SOMA.
- SOMA and the Tenderloin are the most negatively affected by this Mid-Market Plan.
- 35% of Inclusionary housing should be rental housing.
- Local businesses and jobs will be lost.
- Community, cultural and arts should be encouraged in the area.
- Mid-Market will be turned into a Manhattan with this proposal.
(-) Bruce Allison
- He is opposed to this proposal. He is disabled and is currently living in SOMA.
- Most of the rooms in these buildings are vacant because people cannot afford it.
- It all started with Moscone when he displaced a lot of people.
(-) Richard Marquez
- This proposal is making SOMA into a Manhattan.
- Who lives there? People who deserve community based services, affordability, etc.
(-) Casey Mills - Center City SRO Collaborative
- There has been a lack of community involvement with this proposal.
- The people that will be most affected were not involved in this proposal.
- Now they are forced to approve a plan that is totally against them.
- This plan will increase subsidized gentrification.
(-) April Veneracion - South of Market Community Action Network
- More can be done at Mid-Market in regards to jobs and community based services.
- She urges the Commission not to initiate this plan until further discussions have been done.
(+) Byron Yee - Member of the Mid-Market PAC
- They have done extensive outreach in the area and everyone has to be heard.
- This plan has nine to ten years in the works. No one is rushing.
- The community is representative of the PAC and vice-versa.
(+) C.J. Higley - Reuben and Junius
- They do think that the time has come to initiate this plan.
- After ten years, the time has come.
(-) David Wilbur
- He is a recent PAC member.
- He is one of two people that voted against this plan.
- This was not a very open process. Most of the meetings were held at the Flood building in back rooms.
- Most of the powerful land use attorneys have developed this plan.
- It is important that there is review of all the community impacts.
(-) Carolyn Blair - SF Tree Council and the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition
- The coalition is concerned. This will generate increased automobile traffic and be hazardous for bicycle riders.
- Market Street is the busiest bicycle corridor.
- There are existing heavily used bicycle lanes on 7th and 9th streets.
- The Transportation Authority Market Street study calls for decreasing car traffic and increasing pedestrian and bicycle riders' safety.
- They oppose residential parking in areas that are rich in public transportation.
- Cars can live underground but not people.
- This plan should be amended.
(-) Jeremy Nelson - Transportation for a Livable City
- There are outstanding concerns with this plan.
- The mid-market area has one of the lowest ownership of cars in the City.
- Despite having low ownership of cars, the area has high transit of cars.
- There are high statistics of people getting killed by cars.
- They oppose one to one parking, allowing three stories of aboveground parking, etc.
- This plan is not ready for "prime time."
ACTION: Initiated
AYES: Antonini, Hughes, S. Lee, W. Lee
NAYES: Bradford Bell and Olague
ABSENT: Alexander
MOTION: 16984
15b. 2002.0805RTZ (M. FOSTER (415) 558-6362)
MID-MARKET REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL USE DISTRICT - Assessor's Blocks 0341; 0342; 0350; 0351, lot 035; 0355; 3507, lot 039; 3508; 3509, lots 002, 018, 019, 036, 037, 040, 041, 042, and 043; 3510, lot 001; 3701; 3702, excluding lots 015, 016, 029, 031, 032, 033, 034, 035, 036, 055, and 056 (eastern portion); 3703, excluding lots 004, 005, 006, 027, 028, and 029; 3704, lots 025, 026, 049, 050, 051, 052, and 053; 3725, lots 078, 082, 086, 087, 088, 089, 090, 091, and 093; 3727, lots 001, 091, 094, 096, 097, 101, 102, 103, 109, 117, 118, 120, 130, 134, 168, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, and Block 3728, lots 001, 072, 075, 076, 081, 082, 083, 089, and 103. The Commission will consider a Motion of Intent to Initiate Amendments to the Zoning Map pursuant to the proposed Mid-Market Redevelopment Plan and Special Use District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Adopt a Motion of Intent to Initiate Amendments to the Zoning Map.
SPEAKER(S): See Speakers for Item 15a.
ACTION: Initiated
AYES: Antonini, Hughes, S. Lee, W. Lee
NAYES: Bradford Bell and Olague
ABSENT: Alexander
MOTION: 16985
16. 2005.0076T (D. SIDER: (415) 558-6697)
ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL AFFORDABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SRO UNITS - Consideration of an Ordinance amending Planning Code Section 890.88 to define a Single Room Occupancy (SRO) unit as a unit that is affordable to very low income or extremely low income households and making findings of consistency with Planning Code Section 101.1 and the General Plan
Preliminary Recommendation: Pending
(Continued from Regular Meeting of March 24, 2005)
SPEAKER(S):
Sue Hestor
- She would like to have this case continued a few weeks out.
ACTION: Without hearing, item continued to May 19, 2005
AYES: Antonini, Bradford Bell, Hughes, S. Lee, W. Lee, Olague
ABSENT: Alexander
17. 2003.0029E (C. ROOS (415) 558-5981)
ONE RINCON HILL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (425 FIRST STREET) - Public Hearing On Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would demolish the former Bank of America three-story office building, clock tower, and two-story parking garage, and construct a 720-unit development as follows: a 450-ft.-tall, 45-story north tower with about 312 units; a 550-ft.-tall. 54-story south tower with about 354 units; about 14 stacked townhouses, 45-ft.-tall fronting Harrison Street and First Street; lobbies, management office, fitness center; about 3, 220 gross square feet (gsf) of retail; accommodation for 720 parking spaces with attendants and lifts, accessible on First Street; four loading spaces accessible on Harrison Street; about 49,000 gsf of residential open space; and an additional 19,000 gsf of publicly accessible open space along Harrison Street and in the First Street public right-of-way. The project would total about 1,217,315 gsf, a net increase on the site of about 1,133,399 gsf. The site includes Lots 1, 9, and 15, in Assessor's Block 3765, on the block bounded by Harrison, First and Fremont Streets and the Bay Bridge West approach. The north part of the site is in an RC-4 Use district, and Residential Subdistrict of the Rincon Hill Special Use District (SUD). The south part is zoned M-1, and is in the Commercial/Industrial Subdistrict of the Rincon Hill SUD. The north part of the site is zoned 200-R, and the south part is zoned 84-X for Height and Bulk. The project requires the following approvals: 1) rezoning (including Height/Bulk and Use district reclassification for the site), if the proposed Rincon Hill Plan and Downtown Residential (DTR) Use District and proposed Height and Bulk districts were not adopted and/or proceed as scheduled; 2) Conditional Use authorization should the proposed Rincon Hill Plan and Downtown Residential (DTR) Use District not be adopted and/or proceed as scheduled, or proposed Section 309.1 authorization should the Rincon Hill Plan and DTR Use District be approved; 3) demolition and building permits from the Department of Building Inspection; 4) a revocable encroachment permit or street improvement permit from the Department of Public Works (DPW), approval from DPW and the Department of Parking and Traffic for street improvements; and 5) approval from DPW and coordination with Caltrans for use of the First Street right-of-way, and a lot merger, approvable by DPW.
Preliminary Recommendation: Public Hearing to Receive Comments. No Action Required.
NOTE: Written comments will be received at the Planning Department until 5 pm, April 19, 2005.
SPEAKER(S):
(-) Dick Millet
- He lives in Potrero Hill.
- He is opposed to the tall walls, the large towers, and land used for storage.
- Demolition of an architecturally significant building is not acceptable.
- Affordable Housing should not be excluded.
- High rises on the waterfront are an abuse that should not be tolerated.
(-) John Carney
- He lives on Rhode Island.
- He is appalled at this plan.
- There is a one-inch thick volume of paper that emits a lot of things.
- No one has spoken about the historical significance of the building that will be demolished.
ACTION: Hearing held. Public hearing closed. No action required at this time.
18. 2005.0226DDDD (S. VELLVE: (415) 558-6263)
60 CLARENDON AVENUE - north side between the Stanyan Street right-of-way and Twin Peaks Boulevard; Lot 023 in Assessor's Block 2688 - Requests for Discretionary Review and staff-initiated Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2004.04.22.2053 proposing to construct a new single-family dwelling on a steeply down-sloping vacant lot. The house would be two stories at the street frontage and five stories at the rear in an RH-1(D) (House, One-Family (Detached Dwelling)) District and 40-X Height and Bulk District.
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Without hearing, item continued to April 28, 2005
AYES: Antonini, Bradford Bell, Hughes, S. Lee, W. Lee, Olague
ABSENT: Alexander