Minutes
of Meeting
&
Calendar
Commission
Chambers - Room 400
City Hall,
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
Thursday,
April 5, 2001
1:30 PM
Regular
Meeting
PRESENT: Theoharis;
Baltimore; Chinchilla; Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
THE MEETING WAS
CALLED TO ORDER BY PRESIDENT THEOHARIS AT 1:40 PM
STAFF IN ATTENDANCE:
Gerald G. Green – Director of Planning; Larry
Badiner – Zoning Administrator; David Alumbaugh; Jasper Rubin; Kelly LeBlanc;
Alison Borden; Jonathan Lau; Tim Blomgren; Jonathan Purvis; Adam Light;
Ricardo Bressanutti; Tim Woloshyn; Sailesh Mehra; Frank Jones; Paul Lord; Patricia Gerber – Transcription
Secretary; Linda D. Avery – Commission Secretary
A. ITEMS
PROPOSED FOR CONTINUANCE
1. 2001.006DD (DiBARTOLO: 558-6291)
835 LOMBARD STREET - south side of the street between Taylor and Jones Streets,
Lot 020 in Assessor’s Block 0073. Request
for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2000/07/13/5089S.
The subject property contains one structure, a portion of which extends
into the required rear yard. The proposal consists of two components; (1)
to construct a new 425-square-foot rear addition on the fourth floor, within
the permitted build able area, and (2) to remove the gable roof, creating
a flat roof and deck atop the noncomplying structure at the rear of the
subject property. The height of
the roof with proposed deck will be reduced from 20’-4" to 18’. The
site is in an RM-1 (Residential, Mixed, Low Density) District and a 40-X
Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take
Discretionary Review and approve the building permit application with modifications as submitted.
(Continued from Regular Meeting of February 22,
2001)
(Proposed for continuance to April 12, 2001)
ACTION: Continued as proposed
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
2. 2000.1165B (BRESSANUTTI: 558-6892)
2 HENRY ADAMS STREET - west side, between Division Street and Alameda Street;
Lot 1 in Assessor’s Block 3910. Request
under Planning Code Sections 320-322 for project authorization of an office
development consisting of the conversion of up to 49,900 square feet in
an existing building (San Francisco Design Center) from wholesale design
showroom space to office space. This
notice shall also set forth an initial determination of the net addition
of gross square feet of office space, pursuant to Planning Code Section
313.4. The subject property is located
in an M-2 (Heavy Industrial) District and the Industrial Protection Zone,
and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Pending
(Continued from Regular
Meeting of March 22, 2001)
(Proposed for continuance
to April 19, 2001)
ACTION: Continued
as corrected
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
3a. 2000.863BV (WONG: 558-6381)
2712
MISSION STREET - west side, between 23rd and 24th Streets,
lot 003 in Assessor’s Block 3643. The subject property seeks an authorization for a proposed office development
under the smaller building reserve, pursuant to Planning Code Section 321.
The proposal is for a change of use from "Retail" to "Office"
and for the renovation and expansion of an existing 27,831-gross-square-foot
building into a 30,847 gross-square-foot building by enlarging a mezzanine
within the existing structure. The subject property falls within a NC-3 (Moderate Scale Commercial
District) Zoning District and a 50-X/80-B Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Disapproval
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of February 22, 2001)
(Proposed for continuance to April 19, 2001)
ACTION: Continued as proposed
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
3b. 2000.863BV (WONG: 558-6381)
2712 MISSION STREET - west side, between 23rd and 24th Streets, lot 003 in Assessor’s Block
3643. The subject property seeks a parking
variance for the reduction of required off-street parking, pursuant to Planning
Code Section 151. The project proposes
to provide five parking spaces for the conversion of 30,847 gross square
feet of office space on a site, which presently provides no off-street parking
spaces. The subject property falls
within a NC-3 (Moderate Scale Commercial District) Zoning District and a
50-X/80-B Height and Bulk District.
(Continued from Regular
Meeting of February 22, 2001)
(Proposed for continuance to April 19, 2001)
ACTION: Continued
as proposed
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
4a. 2000.190BX (LeBLANC: 558-6351)
201
SECOND STREET - southeast corner of Second Street and Howard Street,
Lot 97 in Assessor’s Block 3736. Request under Planning Code Sections 320-325
for authorization to deduct up to 44,500 square feet of office space from
the City’s Office Development Annual Limit.
The proposal is for the construction of a 12-story, 160-foot-tall
building with a total of approximately 60,000 gross square feet including
up to 44,500 square feet of office space and approximately 7,700 square
feet of retail and/or restaurant space.
The project also includes a minimum of 1,020 square feet of open
space. This project lies within a C-3-O(SD) (Downtown
Office, Special Development) District and within the 350-S Height and Bulk
District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Continued from Regular Meetings of February 8, 2001 and March 8, 2001;
and Re-noticed for March 15, 2001, because of change in project description.
Project added 2 stories and 9,500 square feet of office space by
request of applicant.)
(Proposed for continuance to April 26, 2001
ACTION:
Continued as proposed
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
4b. 2000.190BX (LeBLANC: 558-6351)
201
SECOND STREET - southeast corner of Second Street and Howard Street,
Lot 97 in Assessor’s Block 3736. Request
under Planning Code Section 309 (Downtown Code) for Determinations of Compliance
and Exceptions, including an exception to the setback requirements of Section
132.1 of the Code for the construction of a 12-story, 160-foot-tall building
with a total of approximately 60,000 gross square feet including up to 44,500
square feet of office space and approximately 7,700 square feet of retail
and/or restaurant space. The project
also includes a minimum of 1,020 square feet of open space. This project lies within a C-3-O(SD) (Downtown
Office, Special Development) District and within the 350-S Height and Bulk
District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of February 8, 2001, and March 8, 2001, and Re-noticed
for March 15, 2001, because of change in project description. Project added 2 stories and 9,500 square feet
of office space by request of applicant.)
(Proposed
for continuance to April 26, 2001)
`
ACTION: Continued as proposed
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
5. 2000.1310C (DiBARTOLO: 558-6291)
1268
GRANT AVENUE - southeast corner of Grant Avenue and Vallejo Street;
Lot 044 in Assessor’s Block 145. Request
for Conditional-Use Authorization to allow amplified live and recorded music
(defined as "Other Entertainment" by Planning Code Section 790.38)
in an existing full-service restaurant and bar, d.b.a. Basta Pasta, as required
by Planning Code Section 722.48, in the North Beach Neighborhood Commercial
Zoning District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed
for continuance to April 26, 2001)
ACTION: Continued
as proposed
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
6. 2000.765E (PULON:
558-5978)
67-69 Turk
Street - Appeal
of Preliminary Negative Declaration: The proposed project would construct
a mixed-use building on the southeast corner of Turk and Taylor Streets.
The proposed building would be approximately 96,984 gross square feet (gsf),
accommodating: 12,432 gsf of mechanical and maintenance space in the basement
floor; 7,207 gsf of retail on the ground floor; 40,484 gsf of parking on
floors 2-4; and 36,861 gsf of office on floors 5-7. The tenant parking garage
would provide 76 parking spaces, without any loading spaces. The building
would be 106 feet tall. Vehicular site access to the proposed parking garage
would be from Taylor Street. Pedestrian street level site access to the
retail and office spaces would be from Turk Street. The existing 84 parking
spaces on a surface- and basement-level garage would be demolished. The
project site, approximately 12,940 sq. ft, is on Assessor's Block 0342 and
Lot 011, in a C-3-G Zoning District and a 120-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Uphold Negative Declaration.
(Proposed continuance to April 26, 2001)
ACTION:
Continued as proposed
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
7. 2001.0141D (CABREROS:
558-6169)
1041 LAKE STREET - between 11th and 12th Avenues, Lot 043 in Assessor’s Block
1371. Request for Discretionary
Review of Building Permit Application No. 2000/09/07/9909, proposing to
construct two additional floors and rear deck onto an existing one-story
over garage single family dwelling. The
proposed addition occurs within the permitted building envelope in an RH-2
(Residential, House, Two-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation:
Take Discretionary Review and disapprove the project.
(Proposed for continuance
to May 17, 2001)
ACTION: Continued
as proposed
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
8. 2001.0102C (WOLOSHYN:
558: 6612)
2238 GEARY BOULEVARD - north side between Broderick and Divisadero Streets; Lot 025 in Assessor's
Block 1079 within the existing Kaiser Medical Office Building. Request for Conditional-Use Authorization under
Planning Code Section 712.43 to operate a Large Fast Food Restaurant on
the first floor of the existing Kaiser office building, located within an
NC-3 District (Neighborhood Commercial Moderate Scale) and The Geary Boulevard/Divisadero
Street Special-Use District.
WITHDRAWN
B. COMMISSIONERS' QUESTIONS
AND MATTERS
9. Consideration of Adoption
– draft minutes of March 22, 2001.
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
10. Commission Matters
Baltimore: Requested staff to schedule a presentation on present process on
expediting housing that will come on line.
Theoharis: Asked Commission secretary
to prepare a letter to the Housing and Land Use Committee regarding their
meetings time conflict with Planning Commission meetings
C.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
11.
Director's Announcements
- 366-368 South Van Ness Avenue – requested
to be move to the beginning of the calendar
- Housing Land Use Transportation Committee
– respond to two request from Sup.
McGoldrick on April 12, 2001
1) Communicate the status of Residential Element of the
General Plan
2) Participating in a discussion about a community planning
effort
- Doggie Dinner Head City will be responsible
for the repair/restoring
12. Review of Past Week's Events at the
Board of Supervisors and Board of Appeals
- 222
El Camino del Mar – Discretionary Review before Commission on 1995, action
was to take discretionary review and
this project ultimately was not built.
- 69 DeHaro Street – Discretionary
Review - Upheld Commission decision by +3 –1.
13.
(GREEN/ARCE: 558-64411/558-6332)
COW HOLLOW NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN GUIDELINES – Director
will give a status report.
SPEAKER(S): None
14. (ALUMBAUGH:
558-6601)
BETTER NEIGHBORHOODS 2002 – Informational presentation regarding
Central Waterfront Neighborhood Plan.
SPEAKER(S): None
D.
CONSIDERATION OF FINDINGS AND FINAL ACTION -- PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
15a. 1999.603BX (LeBLANC:
558-6351)
555
MISSION STREET - south side of Mission Street between First and Second
Streets, with a secondary frontage on Minna Street, Lots 69, 70, 78, 79,
80 and 81 in Assessor’s Block 3721. Request
under Planning Code Section 309 (Downtown Project) for Determinations of
Compliance and Request for Exceptions, including an exception to the Separation
of Towers requirement (Section 132.1(c)), exceptions to the Bulk requirements
(Sections 270(d)(2), 270(d)(3)(A), and 270(d)(3)(B)), and an exception to
the Reduction of Ground Level Wind Currents requirement (Section 148) for
the demolition of six vacant buildings and the construction of a 31-story,
approximately 455-foot-tall office tower containing up to 557,000 gross
square feet of office space, approximately 8,000 square feet of ground
floor retail space, 11,140 square feet of public open space and 150 parking
spaces. The project lies within
a C-3-O (Downtown, Office) District and within 500-S and 550-S Height and
Bulk Districts.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
(Continued
from March 8, 2001 Regular Meeting)
Note:
On March 8, 2001, following public testimony, the Commission closed the
public hearing and passed a Motion of Intent to approve the project with
499,000 gross square feet of office space, and requested staff to prepare
draft Motions for the Commission’s consideration on April 5, 2001.
SPEAKER(S): None -
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
MOTION NO.: 16129
15b. 1999.603BX (LeBLANC: 558-6351)
555
MISSION STREET - south side of Mission Street between First and Second
Streets, with a secondary frontage on Minna Street, Lots 69, 70, 78, 79,
80 and 81 in Assessor’s Block 3721. Request under Planning Code Sections
320-325 for authorization to deduct up to 557,000 square feet of office
space from the City’s office development annual limit. The proposal is for
the demolition of six vacant buildings and the construction of a 31-story,
approximately 455-foot tall office tower containing up to 557,000 gross
square feet of office space as well as ground floor retail space,
public open space and parking and loading spaces.
The project lies within a C-3-O (Downtown, Office) District and within
500-S and 550-S Height and Bulk Districts.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
(Continued from Regular Meeting of March
8, 2001)
Note: On
March 8, 2001, following public testimony, the Commission closed the public
hearing and passed a Motion of Intent to approve the project with 499,000
gross square feet of office space, and requested staff to prepare draft
Motions for the Commission’s consideration on April 5, 2001.
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
MOTION NO.: 16129
E.
REGULAR CALENDAR
16. (BORDEN: 558-5979)
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research
Institute Abbreviated Institutional Master Plan - 2318 Fillmore Street, Assessor’s Block 612, Lot 19,
2209 Webster Street, Assessor’s Block 612, Lot 7, 2232 Webster Street, Assessor’s
Block 613, Lot 28, 2238 Webster Street, Assessor’s Block 613, Lot 15, 2244
Webster Street, Assessor’s Block 613, Lot 16, 2250-52 Webster Street, Assessor’s
Block 613, Lot 17, 2389 Washington Street, Assessor’s Block 613, Lot 18
and 2472 Clay Street, Assessor’s Block 612, Lot 17. The Planning Department
received an Abbreviated Institutional Master Plan (Abbreviated IMP) for
the Smith-Kettlewell Eye Institute on January 5, 2001. Per the requirements
of Planning Code Section 304.5(d), this filing is being reported to the
members of the Planning Commission. The
Commission may decide either to hold or not hold a public hearing on the
plan at a later date. A hearing would be for the receipt of public testimony
only and subject to the same notice requirements as a conditional use, as
set forth in Planning Code Section 306.3.
Please note that the Smith-Kettlewell Eye Institute submitted
this document to the Zoning Administrator as part of an ongoing enforcement
action involving some of their properties in the Webster Street Historic
District.
SPEAKER(S):
(+) Steve
Nicholson
-
Like many San Franciscan recognize
the importance of our historical resources in creating the City unique image
and world image
-
Last year in the annual meeting
of the National Trust for Historic Preservation was a little dishearting
hear some of the speakers mentioned the City of San Francisco as a example of a city that failed to effectively
protect its historic resources
-
The Webster Street Historical District
is one of the few effort for preservation that we had made, and without
the public participation, particularly in the form of the Friends of Webster
Street Historical District.
-
Smith Kettlewell failured to comply
with the requirements of that historic district, it would have gone unnoticed
to the Department and unknown to this Commission
-
On the institution past behavior,
it is only reasonable to expect that the neighborhood and the public at
large, would be skeptical of their future behaviors
-
Urge Commission to schedule
a public hearing, so the Smith Kettlewell master plan can be heard, evaluated for appropriateness and determined
that are true and effective means for enforcement that would be put in place.
-
People who brought this issue to
your attention, needs to participate in the process
(-)Ian
Berke
-
35 years ago Kettelwell was giving
permission to build an enormous out scale ugly concrete building on a handsome
residential block
-
One of the conditions was not to
expand in further north from this building
-
No content with these institutions
began to buy five more Victorian houses, all in the City's first designated
historic district.
-
The neighborhood curious, why these
houses were deteriorating, discovered that these houses were using for offices
and housing
-
Neighbors organized and petitioned
the Planning Department, who ordered this institution to stop this usage
and submit an abbreviated master plan
-
Master Plan is very abbreviated;
it is conspicuous for what it does not say.
-
This is organization that has a
long history or arrogance and duplicity
-
If you think his characterization
of them as arrogant is exaggerated, consider that the appealing the Planning
Department requirements that seize the illegal use of one this building,
it is at the Board of Appeals right now.
-
This organization has a huge impact
in the surrounding neighborhood and literally affect hundreds of people
-
Urge Commission to schedule a public
hearing
(-) Ruth
Poole, Chief Operating Officer at Smith Kettlewell Institute
- Sad
that the neighborhood feel the way that they do
- We have tried to have a good harmony with neighborhood and hid anything
from the neighborhood or the Planning Commission
- Renovated
the building on Webster Street
- No intention
of these buildings been thorn down
-
We have done everything that has
been possible
-
Urge the Commission to approve their
master plan
(-) Donald
Langley
-
Since them abbreviate the General
Plan is not a plan at all, does not show clue to the institute future, its
development, its use of existing houses or its intention regarding other
houses in the area
-
A full must held to learn what this
institute is going to do
- They
had fixed the houses after pressure from the neighbors
- There
is a notice of violation regarding meeting at Board of Permit Appeals
- Notice
was received a day before the deadline
- Suggest
enforcing restrictions
- This
a friendly neighborhoods
- All
the houses have been converted into offices
(-) Beverly
McCallister
1996 when
the Planning Commission allowed this institute to build this concrete research
building, stated that shouldn't be not further north structural expansion
or the in hospital related activities, because the fragile nature of the
historic nature surrounded, They expanded north anyway.
- Violated
the Planning Code
- This
is a historic district
- Request a full hearing, due to neighbors no knowing how this institution
planning to use this buildings
(-) John
Sanger, Sanger and Olson
- Speaking
on behalf of the Institute
- Institute
has done everything that had been required by the Zoning Administrator
-
Institute would go by the Planning Code and the Building Code as a been
interpreted by the Zoning Administrator
-
The only reason anything is on appeal to the Board of Permit Appeals is
because we can not determine what more is to be done with respect to outstanding
notice of violation
-
Despite the fact every building on Webster Street has been vacated and the
institute master plan has committed that they would in the future be occupy
for residential purposes in accordance with Planning Code is still an outstanding
notice of violation
-
ZA indicated that would like to
withdrawn the appeal, if someone is send to inspect to determine that compliances
have been achieved.
-
Allegations that have made regarding
the institute to disrespect for the neighborhood are really outrageous,
this like re-living the hearing that occurred before the Commission in 1961.
(-) John
Barbey
-
We have difficulty of enforcement
from the Planning Department and Landmarks Board
- There
is not budget for enforcement
- This
obviously illustrate the vulnerability of an historic district in San Francisco
This
institute has been very disingenuous
- Offices
are not residential uses
-
They have to re-establish the confidence
of the public that they are going to be good neighbors
- We should
hold a full hearing
ACTION: Full Hearing on 5/1/7/01
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
MOTION NO.: 16130
17. 2000.407Z
(J. LAU: 558-6383)
INNER SUNSET NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT MAP
AMENDMENT -Consideration of a draft resolution recommending amendments to the Zoning
Map to reclassify thirty-five commercial parcels in the vicinity of Irving
Street between 5th Avenue and 19th Avenue from current Small-Scale Neighborhood
Commercial District (NC-2) to Inner Sunset Neighborhood Commercial District
(NCD), and to reclassify one commercial parcel from current Inner Sunset
NCD Zoning to NC-2.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
MOTION NO.: 16131
18. 1999.210E (BLOMGREN: 558-5979)
3620 ‑ 19th STREET - within the block bound by 18th
Street, Guerrero Street, 19th Street and Oakwood Street, Assessor's Block
3587, Lots 18, 68, and 70. Appeal
of a Preliminary Negative Declaration. Proposed new construction of
five two‑, three‑, and four‑story buildings containing
a total of 43 dwelling units. The site currently has a 32-space parking
lot, which is accessed by a gate on Oakwood and a facade of an industrial
building at the 3620 19th Street frontage, which would be demolished.
The new buildings would reach a maximum height of 40 feet in a 40‑X
height/bulk district. Lots 68 and
70 are located in a RH‑2 (Residential House, Two‑Family) zoning
district. Lot 18 is located in a
RH‑3 (Residential House, Three‑Family) zoning district.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Uphold Preliminary Negative Declaration
(Continued from Regular Meeting
of March 22, 2001)
SPEAKER(S):
(+) John Barbey
- Many years a proposal half the size of this one was rejected
- In emergencies it will be a very difficult street to access
- Architect presented complete revised plans
- Very small cosmetics changes were made
- Concerned regarding safety
- Seismically this building has not been refurbish
- This will be very dangerous
(-) Cynthia Arnold
-
Lived in the are since
1988
-
Sidewalk have been parking
lots
-
Sunday two inner lanes,
are used as parking lot
-
During Summer our neighborhood
is bombarded with a lots traffic
-
Building on Oakwood
Street, will contain to her knowledge 8 two bedroom units
There are only 8 parking spaces
available
-
Allow the same parking
spaces as the same of apartments buildings
-
Negative Declaration
says that traffic is horrible
-
It is disrespectful
and insulting to the neighbors
-
Support housing, but
this project is not a good idea to our neighborhood
-
Size of this building
should be decrease
(-) Nick Pasquariello
-
Lived in the area since
1979
-
Only the southern portion
of it was able to build on this model, it shows what it is proposed to be
build
-
Formerly on this lot
was a warehouse, it walls were 14 feet high, this warehouse was there for
70 years, and this whole neigborhood was built around it.
-
There was no zoning
during those years
-
When this warehouse
was put there, it was put there with the sense that there were livable units,
in the west side of this building on Guerrero St.
-
This proposed building
will block the light coming into his apartment
(-) Ginny Pryor
-
Lived right across from
the proposed project
-
Unbelievable that they
will bring a 100 people to live in this neighborhood when is already overcrowded
-
There won't be any green
space available,
-
Fire engine could no
access this street
(-) Richard Illig
-
Urge to look the proportional
and negative consequence that this project would have on his surroundings
and vote against as it stand
-
The consequences that
this project would have in this residential are phenomenal
-
Instead of two comparable
house of single block 140 and 144 units we would have two very lot sided
house 183 and 144 units
-
We would a very limited
open space
-
Urge to vote against
this project
-
Developer should reduce
the number of units to something truly in keeping with its urban context.
(-) Adam Klein
-
Hydro Geologist with
15 years of experience
-
Former neighbor of the
proposed project
-
Deficiencies in the
site mitigation plan
-
Thank the Department
of Public Health for scrutiny that they applied to this project, specially
in consideration of the sensitive nature of this development
-
Lacks a certain amount
of specificity in particular with respect to the analysis that are proposed
-
Previous analysis at
the site did not include analysis for the most toxics components associated
with petroleum hydro carbons which are the type of contaminants that have
detected at the site
-
The mitigation plan
does not include provisions to monitor dust during construction, would recommend
putting three mini ramp devices, these aerosol monitoring devices up around
the perimeter of the site, to ensure that residents are not exposed to dust
or potential hazards quimical at an unacceptable concentration
-
The site mitigation
plan indicate the soil sampling plan would be submitted, once the building
design is complete, he believes, that this is inappropriate, the soil sampling
should be incorporated as a part of the site mitigation plan
-
Concerned about the mismanagement of the soil
(-) Dallas Haynes
-
Concerned about the
mechanical exhaust and make up air ventilation fence and system, that will
house on the top of the gateway building on 19th Street
-
Fans of these nature
produce a lots noise
-
It is difficult to find
an engineering solution
-
Giving the system would
be a carbonixide sensor it should be assume that can kick anytime during
a 24 hours period
-
Commission should require
that noise level should be far below that maximum levels allow
-
All materials, debris
boxes, construction vehicles, should be kept of sidewalks, and have our
weekends free of construction
(+) Michael Stanton, Architect
- Addressing specifically the issues
that were raised during the appealing, the emergency access is been reviewed
by the Fire Marshall and the Department is in received of a letter from
him concurrent with the appropriateness emergency vehicle access
-
Ventilation of the garage
is under study, the information we has is that the carbonmonixed sensor
will in fact will keep the fan off most of the time
-
Model that the appellant
shows here, has the bldg., On 19th Street on a location has no
longer in, it had shifted 20 feet to the west to address the specific concern
of light and air to the building on the back
ACTION: Upheld Preliminary Negative Declaration
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
MOTION NO.: 16132
19. 1999.210C (PURVIS: 558-6354)
3620 - 19TH STREET - north side between
Oakwood and Guerrero Streets, a through lot with frontage on Oakwood Street;
Lots 18, 68 & 70 in Assessor's Block 3587. Request for Conditional-Use Approval under
Planning Code Section 304 to develop an up to 43-unit residential PUD (Planned
Unit Development), with exceptions from the rear yard requirements of Section
134 and density standards of Section 209.1(g) & (h), within an RH-2
(Residential, House, 2-Family) Zoning District and an RH-3 (Residential,
House, 3-Family) Zoning District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation:
Approval with conditions
(Continued from Regular Meeting
of March 22, 2001)
SPEAKER(S):
(+) Michael
Stanton, Architect
- Gave
an overall description of the building
(-) Patricia Kenney
- Preservation
of the character and flavor of the neighborhood
- Their
neighborhood stopped the demolition of one the building in the area
- Point
out that they had tried to have a quality life
- Developers
didn't take in consideration any of the neighbors concerns
(-) Leslie
Chin
- This
development is too large
- Would
cause a impact in privacy
- There
is not yard space
- Obstructing
with the quality of our neighborhood
- If this developer could consider scaling down
this building
(-) Eileen Gold
- On 19th
Street block has a total 29 homes owners
-
We would like to retain the stability of the neighborhood
Proposed
project would have a destabilizing impact because of the density and the number of bedroom
- There
is a lots traffic on Guerrero Street, that had a lots of drug traffic
- This
property has a history of no compliances
(+) Jim
Chappel
- Lived
in Guerrero Street
- There
is tremendous shortage of housing
- Commended
the Commission for been very responsible
- This
site is ideal
- It
is accessible to public transportation
- This
is one the most valuable neighborhoods in San Francisco
- Density
is very appropriate for this infield site
- Support
parks, open space
(-) Steve Secret
- Strongly urge no to approve this project
- Concerned
about the number of houses to be build
- Creation
of parking structures
- The excessive number of housing units that not
conform to the PC
- Would
increase noise, traffic a lots of lights for the neighbors
- This
is a monster construction
- Improper
parking garage
- Parking
structure of this size, is not appropriate for this neighborhood
- Concerned
about fume, exhaust, noise, etc.
Proposed design no way conform with incomparability of building façade
according with the Planning Code, the plan unit should only be approve
if offers an outstanding design compliment ting to the design and values
of the surround neighborhood
-
It totally out of character
with the neighborhood
- It should
be approve with out substantial modifications
(+) Ron
Miguel
- Referred
to a letter of support for the project sent by the Housing Coalition
- It
had made a creative use of this very unusual infill site
- Maintain
itself within reasonable density for this City
- It
is ideal as far as density and public transportation
-
Neighbors do not need more parking
spaces
-
Urge Architect and Developer to
work closely with the neighborhood
-
Regret that has not been a landscape
plan submitted at this point, and think that it is very important aspect
of it
(-) Laura Haynes
-
Read a letter of opposition to the
Commission
(+) Ray Sharpateer
-
16 year resident of the community
-
Discuss the issue of great level
at the interior mid-block of the proposed site
-
The great level slope down to 19th
or 18th Street and nearly 5 feet above the adjacent property at the mid
block level
-
The height of the proposed structures
is already taller than any of the structures that they are going to block.
- Would
create a great loss of light
- In
addition of loss of privacy
- There
would be lots of noise
- This
a long time residents area
- Project
is too big, needs to scale down
(+) Joel
Luke
- No financial
or professional benefit
- His interest
is that all people has a quality living
- Community that he loves and cherishes
- Community
character should be saved
- Closely
community that cares about the neighborhood
- Density is a form quality
well plan residences, which has the potential to enhance this community
- Density of this development
is less than other developments, which faced initial opposition, and ultimately
become assets to the community
- This
industrial site is currently a scar on a beautiful neighborhood
(+) Steve Nicholson-
-
Take in consideration as you deliver
on this, and if in fact, a Planning Commission in the City shows to denied
a project significantly smaller than this in 1979, there had to be some
good reasons
- Project needs to be scale down
(-) John
Barbey
-
Lived on Liberty Street, 2 blocks away from the proposed project
for 17 years
- Do not think that a former non compliance use,
should be use like this cottage houses, there are several of them, that
were made into residential units should be use as an excuse to introduce
new non compliance structures into the mid block.
- These houses were built before there
was any zoning
- There
is not open space, it is very minimal
-
This do not seems a fair argument
for introducing these houses, there are huge density
(-) Nick Pascoriello
- Lived in the area for 20 years
- There is a section in the Planning Code that say that is the obligation
of the City to protect the affordable housing
- Project has to be scale back
-
This would be cause of a terrible impact to this neighborhood
- Architect
has little sensitivity in accommodating the concerns of the neighborhood
(-) Jan Newfield
- Our
building's windows would be blocked
(-) David
Ball
- Feel
this project as proposed is unsuitable
- Do not
approve this project
- Density
proposed will have an adverse effect in the environment we are residing
- - Some
of the areas most concerns is the emergency access path
- How
people would move into this proposed building
- Height
is out the context with its neighboring buildings
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
MOTION NO.: 16133
20a. 2000.1268XCV (LIGHT: 558-6254)
663-665 SUTTER STREET
- south side between Mason and Taylor Streets, Lot 11, in Assessor’s
Block 297. Request under Planning Code Section 309 (Downtown Code) for Determinations
of Compliance and Exceptions, including an exception for a building exceeding
80 feet in a 80-130-F District (Section 263.8), and an exception to the
bulk limit (Section 270) for a new building in a C-3-G District (Section
138). The proposal is to build an
88’-0" high, 10-level (3 below grade, 7 above grade) structure containing
a total of 92,380 square feet, including 212 parking spaces, and approximately
41,880 square feet of recreation space (swimming pool, gymnasium, and women’s
locker room facilities) that will connect to the rear of the existing Olympic
Club which faces on Post Street.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval
with Conditions
(Continued from Regular Meeting
of March 22, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
(+) Bob
McCarthy
-
The site is a garage that was built
in 1939
-
In order to make accommodations
for the changes in demographic, the real heart and soul of this proposed
site is preserving the parking, it is really to accommodate that dynamic
-
Creates a code compliance structure
-
Comparable design
-
Now provides off street loading
-
Its is pedestrian friendly
-
Donating $60,000 to the Open Space Fund
John C. Davis, Principal Architect
- Gave a description of the project
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
MOTION NO.: 16134
20b. 2000.1268XCV (LIGHT: 558-6254)
663-665 SUTTER STREET
- south side between Mason and Taylor Streets, Lot 11 in Assessor’s Block
297. Request for a Conditional-Use
Authorization for a parking garage in a C-3-G District (Section 223(n)).
See description in item (a) above.
The proposal is to build an 88’-0" high, 10-level (3 below grade,
7 above grade) structure containing a total of 92,380 square feet, including
212 parking spaces, and approximately 41,880 square feet of recreation space
(swimming pool, gymnasium, and women’s locker room facilities) that will
connect to the rear of the existing Olympic Club which faces on Post Street.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval
with Conditions
(Continued from Regular Meeting of March 22, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
MOTION NO.: 16135
20c. 2000.1268XCV (LIGHT: 558-6254)
663-665 SUTTER STREET
- south side between Mason and Taylor Streets, Lot 11 in Assessor’s Block
297. Request for a variance from the open space requirements for a new building
in a C-3-G District (Section 138). The
applicant does not propose any public open space for this project and would
like to make an in-lieu payment to the open space fund.
See description in item (a) above.
The proposal is to build an 88’-0" high, 10 level (3 below grade,
7 above grade) structure containing a total of 92,380 square feet, including
212 parking spaces, and approximately 41,880 square feet of recreation space
(swimming pool, gymnasium, and women’s locker room facilities) that will
connect to the rear of the existing Olympic Club which faces on Post Street.
(Continued from Regular Meeting
of March 22, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
ITEM # 21 TAKEN OUT OF ORDER FOLLOWED
ITEM #13
21. 2000.1179C (BRESSANUTTI:
558-6892)
366-368 SOUTH
VAN NESS AVENUE - west side
between 14th Street and 15th Street; Lot 61 in Assessor's
Block 3616 – Request for Conditional-Use Authorization to enlarge a two-unit
residential building, increasing the floor-to-ceiling height of the ground
floor by 6'-6 and the overall height of the building from 32'-0 to approximately
38'-6 , extending the ground floor to the rear property line, and modifying
the façade of the building, requiring Conditional-Use Authorization per
Section 215(a) of the Planning Code. No
change in the number of dwelling units is proposed. The project is located in a C-M (Heavy Commercial)
District and a Mixed-Use Housing Zone, and a 50-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval
with conditions.
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Approved as amended
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
MOTION NO.: 16128
22. 2001.0034C (WOLOSHYN: 558-6612)
1290 CHESTNUT
STREET - north side at northeast corner of Van Ness Avenue, Lot 011 in Assessor’s
Block 0478. Request for Conditional-Use Authorization under Planning Code
Section 209.8(d) to allow office use above the ground story in an RC (Residential-Commercial
Combined) District. The proposal
is to alter an existing three-story office building (currently 30 feet in
height) by adding a new fourth story to contain 262 square feet of office
space resulting in a new height of 40 feet. The total net increase in floor area is 48
square feet. The subject property is located in an RC-3 (Residential-Commercial
Combined, Medium Density) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval
with Conditions
(Continued from Regular Meeting of March 22, 2001)
SPEAKER(S):
Project Architect
Description
of the project
(-) Don Shepard
- Concerned about commercialization of the neighborhood
- More
offices, there will be more traffic
- There
is a lot of illegal parking
- Lost of light into their bedroom
(-) Julie
Shepard
- Comercial intensification
of the neighborhood
- Major part of this project would in our side
of their building
- Height
of the project
- Parking
is horrible problem in this part of town
- A
lots people park on the sidewalks
- Air
and light is the major concerns
(-) Madeline Camisa
- Long time resident of this neighborhood
- Improvement
of this particular property is out of proportion
- It
is the only commercial property on this block
- Brings
down the character of the neighborhood
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe,
NAYES: Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
MOTION NO. 16136
23a. 2000.264CD
(MARTIN: 558-6616)
1087
MISSISSIPPI STREET
- east side, between 23rd and 25th Streets, Lot 049 in Assessor’s Block
4224. Request for a Conditional-Use Authorization to allow the construction
of two dwelling units in an M-1 (Light Industrial) Zoning District and the
Industrial Protection Zone Buffer, per Planning Code Section 215(a) and
Planning Commission Resolution No. 14861, and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Approval with conditions
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of March 22, 2001)
ACTION: Continued to 4/19/01
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
At Approximately 6:46 p.m. the Planning Commission
convened into a Special Discretionary Review (DR) Hearing to hear and act
on Discretionary Review matters.
23b. 2000.264CD (MARTIN: 558-6616)
1087 MISSISSIPPI
STREET - east side between 23rd and 25th Streets, Lot 049 in Assessor’s
Block 4224. Staff-initiated request
for Discretionary Review for the demolition of an existing, vacant industrial
building and construction of housing and space for production, distribution
and repair businesses in an existing industrial building space in an M-1
(Light Industrial) Zoning District and the Industrial Protection Zone Buffer
per Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 14861 and 16079; and a 40-X Height
and Bulk District. NOTE: This project was previously noticed on February
8, 2001, and has since been modified. The
previous notice stated that the ground and second stories would be occupied
by office space.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review
(Continued from Regular Meeting
of March 22, 2001)
ACTION: Continued to 4/9/01
AYES: Theoharis, Baltimore, Chinchilla,
Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
24. 2000.1047D (SMITH: 558-6322)
4023-4025 – 25TH STREET - south side
of the street between Noe and Sanchez Streets, Lot 040 in Assessor's Block
6548. Request
for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2000/11/08/5161 proposing to merge Units
4023 and 4025 in order to reduce the number of dwelling units in the building
from two to one in an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) District and
a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation:
Do not take Discretionary Review and approve the project as submitted.
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S):
Patrick
Avanan, Property Owner
- Nice neighborhood
that would like to raise his family in it
- Loves the sunlight and the beautiful weather of
the area
- Worked hard and saved money to be able to become a property owner,
and now it seems that this is going to be taken away
Bill Patchan, Project Architect
- Gave a
description about the project
-
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe,
NAYES:
Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
25. 1999.811D (PUTRA:
558-6233)
1660
MISSION STREET - west side between South Van Ness Avenue
and Thirteenth Street, lots 5 and 6 in Assessor’s Block 3512. Request for
Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2000 0515 0033,
to construct a six-story above grade level, approximately 76-feet-tall addition
with 25,365 gross square feet of office and 5,073 square feet of parking
at grade level. This is an addition to the existing 92,000-gross-square-foot
city office building, of which 22,610 square feet are in an underground
garage, in a C-M (Heavy Commercial) District; and a 105-J Height and Bulk
District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary
Review and approve the Building Permit Application as revised.
(Continued from Regular Meeting of March 1, 2001)
ACTION: Continued to 5/3/01
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
26. 2000.657D (MEHRA:
558-6257)
2531-33
BAKER STREET - west side between Vallejo and Green Streets, Lot 004
in Assessor’s Block 0956. Requests
for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2000/01/28/559
proposing to alter the existing building containing two dwelling units
by adding a horizontal extension towards the front of the lot, and by merging
the two dwelling units into one in an RH-1 (Residential, House, Single-Family)
District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do
not take Discretionary Review and approve the application as revised.
Note:
On March 22, 2001, after public testimony, the Commission closed public
hearing. The Commission voted to
continue this matter to April 5, 2001 by a vote of +6 –0, in order for staff
to provide the following information: 1)
date the building was built; 2) what was the original use; 3) what do the
plans look like now that the neighbors have signed off; 4) what is the current
condition of the building; 5) what are the practical implications of approving
an expansion of the building envelope to make it a conforming, noncomplying
use.
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe,
NAYES: Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
27. 2001.0153D (JONES: 558-6477)
160
YERBA BUENA/166 YERBA BUENA - south side between Santa Paula Avenue
and Maywood Drive, adjusted lots 38, and 37 (was lot 8 and 7) for Assessor’s
Block 3078. Request for Discretionary Review on Building Permits Applications
2001/11/17/9921 and 2001/01/17/9957. Both permits are for the construction
of a driveway and a retaining wall on two separate lots in an RH-1(D)
(One-Family
Detached Dwelling) and a 40-X Height and Bulk District
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve
the project as submitted.
SPEAKER(S):
(-) Terry
Norenberg, DR requestor
-
Speaking on behalf of the home owners
in San Francis Woods
- Live two streets away from the project
-
There is obviously a significant
real estate development on the way
-
This will have an effect on the
home owners of the Association
-
Asked for a full review of the project
-
This is strictly a property development
matter
-
Project is situated in a steep hill
side made out of pour soil
-
Only access to the site is on Yerba Buena Avenue, and it is already
heavily over traffic local street
-
Permit is been contested provide
for the building of a road way , which will sit in an unsafe distance from
the residential house, and because it will facilitate the over building
on the site
-
This is a crucial point on the project,
if the site has 55 foot access road, which currently does, it could be develop
in a less dense degree if it has the 21 foot exit road
-
Drawings submitted showed that the
lot was been subdivided
-
No notice was given to the neighborhood
-
A wall was been build without permit
-
We must anticipate that the lot
must not be saleable considering the conditions of the hill side
(+) Michael
Acrobado, Project Sponsor
-
Lived at 160 Yerba Buena
-
Had a battle going on with the Home
Owners Association pertaining to the driveway and light pillar that was
situated in an area that is hazards for coming in and out of our driveway
-
Board of Supervisors, and Public
Works unanimously voted that this voted had to be removed
-
Got support from over 100 home owners
from the neighborhood
-
Some property owners in the neighborhood
combined their driveways so that they can easy access to their garage
(+) Mike
Donbraski
-
We are not asking for rights that
any other neighbor in the area
-
This is safety issue
-
Our garage is at the foot of the
that driveway, it is literally impossible to get into our garage, we had
to do a five to a seven point turn every time we want to get out
-
Moving the wall over and widen the
driveway it widens the radius of getting in and out the driveway
-
We feel that this is not inconveniencing
anybody
(+) Peter
Straton
- Supports project
(+) Milton
Honeywood
- Supports project-
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Theoharis,
Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Fay
G. PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of the public may address
the Commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject
matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Commission
will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception.
When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing
at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Commission
has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Commission
must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the Calendar.
Each member of the public may address the Commission for up to three
minutes.
The Brown Act forbids a commission from taking
action or discussing any item not appearing on the posted agenda, including
those items raised at public comment. In
response to public comment, the commission is limited to:
(1) responding to statements made
or questions posed by members of the public; or
(2) requesting staff to report
back on a matter at a subsequent meeting; or
(3) directing staff to place the
item on a future agenda. (Government
Code Section 54954.2(a))
Adjournment: 7: 45
THE DRAFT MINUTES WERE PROPOSED FOR ADOPTION AT THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THURSDAY, JUNE 7, 2001.