Meeting Minutes
Commission Chambers - Room 400
City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
Thursday, March 1, 2001
1:30 PM
Regular
Meeting
PRESENT: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
ABSENT: None
THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY PRESIDENT
THEOHARIS AT 1:48 p.m.
STAFF IN ATTENDANCE: Gerald G.
Green, Director of Planning; Larry Badiner, Zoning Administrator; Isolde
Wilson; Catherine Bauman; Jim Miller; Dan DiBartolo; Nora Priego, Transcription
Secretary; Linda Avery, Commission Secretary
A. ITEMS PROPOSED FOR CONTINUANCE
1. 2001.0071D (MEHRA: 558-6257)
2121 DIVISADERO
STREET – west side between Sacramento and Clay streets, Lot 005 in
Assessor’s Block 1004. Request for
Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2000/11/20/6273,
proposing to remodel the 4th floor, construct a 22-foot addition at the rear on
all four levels. The south side
exterior wall between the stairs and garage will be pushed out by four feet so
as to line up with the exterior garage wall.
Lastly, the garage door will be widened to a maximum of 12 feet in an
RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk
District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
2. 1998.281BC (GORDON:
558-6309)
185 BERRY STREET
- bounded by Third, Berry and Fourth Streets and China Basin Landing, in
Assessor’s Block 3803, Lot 5. Request
under Planning Code Sections 320-325 for authorization to deduct up to 120,000
square feet of office space from the City’s office development annual limit. The
proposal is to construct a three-story addition to the existing office
building. The site is located in the M-2 (Heavy Industrial) District, the
Mixed-Use Area of the IPZ (Industrial Protection Zone), the proposed Ballpark
Vicinity Special District’s South-End Office District and the 90-X Height and
Bulk District. This notice serves as
public notification of the Planning Department’s initial determination of the
net addition of gross square footage of office space per Planning Code Sections
313.4 and 314.4. Please note: Under
Case No. 98.281V, an off-street parking variance for the proposed project was
heard before the Zoning Administrator on August 23, 2000. This variance decision is currently pending
before the Zoning Administrator. In addition, a rear yard variance, per
Planning Code Section 134, for the proposed dwelling units at this site will be
heard before the Zoning Administrator on March 28, 2001, under Case No.
2001.0179V.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
3a. 1999.554BCD (PURVIS:
558-6354)
601 KING STREET -
south side between 7th and DeHaro Streets,
Assessor’s Block 3800, Lots 1 and 2. Request under Planning Code Sections
320-325 for authorization to deduct up to 237,500 square feet of office space
from the City's office development annual limit. The proposal is to demolish
two warehouse structures and construct a new office building. The project is
designed as a PUD (Planned Unit Development), pursuant to Section 304, with
exceptions from off-street parking standards under Section 151. This notice serves as public notification of
the Planning Department's initial determination of the net addition of gross
square footage of office space per Planning Code Sections 313.4 and 314.4. The
site is within an M-2 (Heavy Industrial) Zoning District, a 50-X Height and
Bulk District, and is within the interim IPZ (Industrial Protection Zone).
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed
for continuance to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
3b. 1999.554BCD (PURVIS:
558-6354)
601 KING STREET -
south side between 7th and DeHaro Streets, Assessor’s
Block 3800, Lots 1 and 2. Request for Conditional-Use Authorization under
Planning Code Section 304 to construct an office building with up to 237,500
gsf (gross square feet), designed as a PUD (Planned Unit Development), with
exceptions from off-street parking standards under Section 151. The site is
within an M-2 (Heavy Industrial) Zoning District, a 50-X Height and Bulk
District, and is within the interim IPZ (Industrial Protection Zone).
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance
to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
3c. 1999.554BCD (PURVIS:
558-6354)
601 KING STREET -
south side between 7th and DeHaro Streets, Assessor’s
Block 3800, Lots 1 and 2. Request for Staff-Initiated Discretionary Review
pursuant to Resolution No. 16079 to demolish two industrial warehouse
structures and construct an office building with up to 237,500 gsf (gross
square feet), designed as a PUD (Planned Unit Development), with exceptions
from off-street parking standards under Section 151 The site is within an M-2
(Heavy Industrial) Zoning District, a 50-X Height and Bulk District, and is
within the interim IPZ (Industrial Protection Zone).
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed
for continuance to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
4a. 2000.277BXC (CRAWFORD: 558-6358)
801 MARKET/44 FOURTH
STREETS - Assessor’s Block 3705
Lot 048, north side of Jessie Street between Fourth and Fifth Streets. Planning
Code Sections 320-325 (Office Development Limitation Program) for allocation of
up to 136,600 gross square feet of
office space for a 12-story building within a C-3-R (Downtown, Retail) District
and within a 160-S Height and Bulk District.
The project will add a third building to the existing Pacific Place
buildings I and II above the existing loading dock on the north side of Jessie
Street between Fourth and Fifth Streets.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
4b. 2000.277BXC (CRAWFORD: 558-6358)
801 MARKET/44 FOURTH
STREETS -
Assessor’s Block 3705 Lot 048, north side of Jessie Street between Fourth and
Fifth Streets. Request under Planning
Code Section 309 (Downtown Code) for Determinations of Compliance, for construction
of a 12 story building including 136,600 gross square feet of office space. This
project lies within a C-3-R (Downtown, Retail) District and within a 160-S
Height and Bulk District. The project
will add a third building to the existing Pacific Place buildings I and II
above the existing loading dock on the north side of Jessie Street between
Fourth and Fifth Streets.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed fro continuance to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
4c. 2000.277BXC (CRAWFORD: 558-6358)
801 MARKET/44 FOURTH
STREETS -
Assessor’s Block 3705 Lot 048, north side of Jessie Street between Fourth and
Fifth Streets. Request
under Planning Code Section 219.c for professional or business offices not
offering on-site service to the public in a C-3-R (Downtown, Retail)
District. This project lies within a
C-3-R (Downtown, Retail) District and within a 160-S Height and Bulk
District. The project will add a third
building to the existing Pacific Place buildings I and II above the existing
loading dock on the north side of Jessie Street between Fourth and Fifth
Streets.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
5a. 1999.603BX (LeBLANC:
558-6351)
555 MISSION STREET
- south side of Mission Street between First and Second Streets, with a
secondary frontage on Minna Street, in Assessor’s Block 3721, Lots 69, 70, 78,
79, 80 and 81. Request under Planning Code Sections 320-325 for authorization
to deduct up to 557,000 square feet of office space from the City’s office
development annual limit. The proposal is to demolish six vacant buildings and
construct a 31-story, approximately 455-foot-tall office tower containing up to
557,000 gross square feet of office
space as well as ground floor retail space, public open space and parking and
loading spaces. This notice serves as
public notification of the Planning Department’s initial determination of the
net addition of gross square footage of office space per Planning Code Sections
313.4 and 314.4. The project lies within a C-3-O (Downtown, Office) District
and within 500-S and 550-S Height and Bulk Districts.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
5b. 1999.603BX (LeBLANC:
558-6351)
555 MISSION STREET
- south side of Mission Street between First and Second Streets, with a
secondary frontage on Minna Street, in Assessor’s Block 3721, Lots 69, 70, 78,
79, 80 and 81. Request under Planning Code Section 309 (Downtown Project) for
Determinations of Compliance and Request for Exceptions, including an exception
to the Separation of Towers requirement (Section 132.1(c)), exceptions to the
Bulk requirements (Sections 270(d)(2), 270(d)(3)(A), and 270(d)(3)(B)), and an
exception to the Reduction of Ground Level Wind Currents requirement (Section
148) for the demolition of six vacant buildings and the construction of a
31-story, approximately 455-foot tall office tower containing up to 557,000
gross square feet of office space,
approximately 8,000 square feet of ground floor retail space, 11,140 square
feet of public open space and 150 parking spaces. The project lies within a C-3-O (Downtown, Office) District and
within 500-S and 550-S Height and Bulk Districts.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
6. 2000.319B (LeBLANC: 558-6351)
235 SECOND STREET
- east side of Second Street between Howard and Folsom Streets, with secondary
frontages on Tehama and Clementina Streets, on Assessor’s Block 3736, Lots 60,
61, 62, 64, 65, 66, and 67. Request
under Planning Code Sections 320-325 for authorization to deduct up to 49,500
square feet of office space from the City’s office development annual
limit. The proposed project would
convert 49,500 square feet of light manufacturing, production and distribution
space into office space. The site is
located in the C-3-O (SD) (Downtown, Office, Special Development) District, and
within 200S and 350S Height and Bulk Districts.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
7a. 2000.986XBCH (LIGHT: 558-6254)
150 POWELL STREET
- east side at the southeast corner of O’Farrell Street, Lot 22, in Assessor’s
Block 327. Request under Planning Code
Section 309 (Downtown Code) for
Determination of
Compliance and Exceptions, including an exception for the off-street freight
loading requirement (Section 132.1(c)), an exception to the sunlight access
requirement (Section 146), a height exception in the 80-130-F height and bulk
district (Section 263.8), and a bulk
exception (Section 272), in a C-3-R (Downtown Retail) zoning district and a
80-130-F height and bulk district. The
proposal is to seismically upgrade and expand an existing four-story Category
IV building in the Kearny-Market-Mason-Sutter Conservation District. The expansion will include the demolition of
three smaller adjacent buildings fronting on O’Farrell Street, a seven-story
horizontal addition and a three-story vertical addition, to the existing
Category IV building. The expanded
building would contain two stories of retail and five stories of office.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to March 15, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
15, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
7b. 2000.986XBCH (LIGHT: 558-6254)
150 POWELL
STREET - east side at the southeast corner of O’Farrell Street,
Lot 22, in Assessor’s Block 327.
Request under Planning Code Sections 320-325 (Office Development
Limitation Program) for a 7-story, 122-foot tall building with up to 70,000
gross square feet office space, approximately 40,000 square feet of which would
be net new office space, and approximately 41,000 square feet of retail space,
in a C-3-R (Downtown Retail) zoning district and a 80-130-F height and bulk
district. Pursuant to Planning Code
Section 313, the Department has determined that the project would result in the
net addition of approximately 40,000 square feet of gross floor area office
use, requiring compliance with the Office of Affordable Housing Production
Program. The proposal is to seismically upgrade and expand an existing
four-story Category IV building in the Kearny-Market-Mason-Sutter Conservation
District. The expansion will include
the demolition of three smaller adjacent buildings fronting on O’Farrell
Street, a seven story horizontal addition and a three-story vertical addition,
to the existing Category IV building.
The expanded building would contain two stories of retail and five
stories of office.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to March 15, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
15, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
7c. 2000.986XBCH (LIGHT: 558-6254)
150 POWELL
STREET - east side at the corner of O’Farrell Street, Lot 22, in
Assessor’s Block 327. Request under
Planning Code Section 219(c) for a Conditional Use Authorization for office
uses in a C-3-R zoning district and a 80-130-F Height and Bulk District. The proposal is to seismically upgrade and
expand an existing four-story Category IV building in the
Kearny-Market-Mason-Sutter Conservation District. The expansion will include the demolition of three smaller adjacent
buildings fronting on O’Farrell Street, a seven-story horizontal addition and a
three-story vertical addition, to the existing Category IV building. The building would contain two stories of
retail and five stories of office.
Preliminary Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to March 15, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
15, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
7d. 2000.986XBCH (LIGHT: 558-6254)
150 POWELL
STREET - east side at the southeast corner of O’Farrell Street,
Lot 22, in Assessor’s Block 327.
Request under Section 1111.6 for a Permit to Alter for major alterations
to a Category IV building in the Kearny-Market-Mason-Sutter Conservation
District. The proposal is to
seismically upgrade and expand an existing four-story Category IV building in
the Kearny-Market-Mason-Sutter Conservation District. The expansion will include the demolition of three smaller
adjacent buildings fronting on O’Farrell Street, a seven-story horizontal
addition and a three-story vertical addition, to the existing Category IV
building. The building would contain
two stories of retail and five stories of office.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to March 15, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
15, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
8. 2000.183D (MILLER: 558-6344)
800
POWELL STREET (aka 105 MILES) – east side, north
of California Street between Powell and Stockton Streets, Lot 54 in Assessor’s
Block 243. Request for Discretionary
Review of Building Permit Application No. 2000‑06‑21‑3244S
proposing to construct a one‑story addition to an existing sports
facility in conjunction with the adjacent University Club (800 Powell Street),
pursuant to a Conditional-Use Authorization on August 20, 1998, by Planning
Commission Motion No. 14681 (Case No. 1997.358C). The addition would accommodate squash courts, an exercise and fitness
center, as well as shower and locker facilities. This property is within an RM‑4 (Mixed Residential, High
Density) District, the Nob Hill Special Use District, and a 65‑A Height
and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Do not take
Discretionary Review and approve the project as submitted.
(Proposed for continuance to March 15,
2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March
15, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
9. 2000.1310C (DiBARTOLO: 558-6291)
1268
GRANT AVENUE - southeast corner of Grant Avenue and Vallejo Street; Lot 044
in Assessor’s Block 145. Request for
Conditional-Use Authorization to allow amplified live and recorded music
(defined as "Other Entertainment" by Planning Code Section 790.38) in
an existing full-service restaurant and bar, d.b.a. Basta Pasta, as required by
Planning Code Section 722.48, in the North Beach Neighborhood Commercial Zoning
District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for continuance to April 5, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to April
5, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
10. 2000.1058E (DEAN: 558-5980)
1598
DOLORES STREET - located at the northwest corner of Dolores and 29th Streets; Assessor's Block 6618; Lots 7,
9, 38. Appeal of a Preliminary Negative Declaration. The proposed construction consists of two, four-story
residential buildings with a total of 13 units (two of which would be
affordable units) and demolition of an existing two-story mortuary building. The project would provide 13 off-street
parking spaces. The proposed project
site is 10,500 sq. ft. and is located in the NC-1 (Neighborhood Commercial
Cluster) District. The project would
require Conditional-Use Authorization by the City Planning Commission.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Uphold Negative
Declaration
(Proposed for continuance to April 12,
2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to April
12, 2001
AYES: Baltimore,
Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
B. COMMISSIONERS' QUESTIONS AND MATTERS
11. Consideration of Adoption - draft minutes
of February 15, 2001.
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
12. Commission
Matters
Commissioner Theoharis:
She
requested an update on whether or not the Planning Director or the Commission
Secretary contacted BOS regarding the scheduling conflict of hearings between
the Land Use Committee and the Planning Commission.
C. DIRECTOR'S
REPORT
13. Director's
Announcements
Re:
Commissioners' Training
- The
Commission desires to have some sort of training.
- The
Friends of City Planning (FOCP) is prepared to underwrite the attendance at the
League of California Cities which will be held from March 21 to 23, 2001. This will provide training on recent laws
and will enable the Commissioners to speak to other Commissioners and network.
- Although
this might not accommodate all the Commissioners, the FOCP is prepared to fund
six Commissioners (@ $350 per Commissioner) to attend this or other training.
14. Review
of Past Week's Events at the Board of Supervisors and Board of Appeals
BOS
- The Planning Director and
Hillary Gitelman, Chief, Environmental Planning, attended the Public Health and
Environment Committee for the purpose of responding to questions on server
farms, / computer hotels. It was a
very worthwhile hearing and a lot of information came out of that hearing. Items discussed were related to energy
consumption, how the department was reviewing these types of requests, etc.
BOA
None
15. (GREEN: 558-6411)
Status Report on Annual
Office Limit
SPEAKER(S):
Sue Hestor
- She would like to know when the public would be allowed to have input on this
item.
- Is the public testimony on the 15th or the 22nd of March?
- She would just like to have some sort of information in writing for the
public.
Jeff Heller
- He has concerns about having outside architects consider the projects.
- Bringing outside people created several major problems in the past.
- The people who came in were not substantially educated in regards to Master
Plans, etc. Eventually, this idea was abandoned.
Joe O’Donaghue
- Responding to Commissioner Baltimore’s question regarding housing and what we
can expect regarding low cost housing, not affordable housing--we should look
to the past. In the past, a certain amount of housing and millions of dollars
were collected for extraction fees from downtown developers. We need to see
what we did with those millions of dollars.
- Part of the analysis of today is to look at what worked before.
- We also need to see who were the benefactors of that non-profit housing.
John Bardis
- Mr. O’Donaghue has a very interesting analysis.
- The Commission needs to look deeply in the process of fees being asked as
mitigation measures for the housing impacts of these developments that are
being submitted for application.
- This has been a problem the City has had for 30 to 40 years. The imbalance
between what we are providing in terms of construction of facilities that can
expand the construction work force and the construction of the housing to house
that work force.
- Because of that imbalance we have the problems we have today.
David Cincotta
- He is one of the participants of the projects being considered next week.
People are wondering how much time they have available, how these projects will
be presented, etc
D. CONSIDERATION
OF FINDINGS AND FINAL ACTION -- PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
16. 1999.770DDDDD (WILSON:
558‑6602)
567 ‑ 569
SANCHEZ STREET - east side
between 19th and Hancock Streets; Lot 032 in Assessor's Block 3585. The
proposal is to demolish an existing single‑family dwelling with a
detached garage and construct a new three-story plus attic-over-garage, two‑family
dwelling, in an RH‑3 (Residential, House, Three‑Family) District
and a 40‑X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Take Discretionary Review and approve the project with
modifications.
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of February 1, 2001)
Note: On February 1, 2001, after public testimony, the
Commission closed the public hearing. A
motion of intent to take Discretionary Review and approve the staff
recommendations and reduce the height of the project, passed by a vote
+5 –1, Commissioner Joe voted No.
Project will be brought back to the Commission on February 22,
2001. Public comment will only be
allowed on accuracy of plans.
Note: Without
further Hearing/Consideration, the project was continued from Regular Meeting
of February 22, 2001.
SPEAKER(S):
(+) Alice Barkley
- At the
end of the first hearing the Commission made a motion of intent to make certain
revisions. One of the staff
recommendations was a setback to match the lightwell of Mr. Moran. This has been done. The sponsor would lower the building. The building has been redesigned to be
lower.
- The
building has been lowered 5½ feet from the first design.
- All the
conditions the Commission requested have been met.
(+) Joe O'Donaghue
- There
have been substantial reductions made to the building.
- This is
a single family who would just like to have their family together.
- The
opposition will always be in opposition.
The Commission just needs to bring a closure to this. To string it out further will just be a
great detriment to this family.
(+) Patrick McGrew – Project Architect
- There
has been a considerable amount of compromise in the changes of design to meet
the request of the neighbors.
- There
have been many changes done already to the design to match the design of the
neighborhood.
- No
matter what is done, the opposition will always be in disagreement.
(-) Joe Butler – DR Requestor
- What he
is asking for is what is in their brief, which was distributed a week ago. He doesn't understand why the Planning
Director just viewed it last night.
(-) John Litgo
- He would
like to thank the Commission for taking all this testimony into consideration.
- Although
they are very disappointed with the fact that the Commission didn't accept
their settlement envelope, they certainly respect the opinion of the
Commission.
- At the
previous hearing, Commissioner Fay asked how much could the building be
lowered. Department of Public Works has
determined that the house could be lowered without disrupting the sewer.
- If the
Commission were to accept the project sponsor's new design, the Commission
would be rewarding them for failing to provide correct information.
(-) Ron Slain
- He lives
across the street from the project sponsor.
- He
resents that Mr. O'Donaghue has to speak badly about the neighborhood.
- Even
with the changes made by the Commission, there is still a negative impact.
- This
does nothing to improve the light and air issues.
- They
feel that they are back at square one!
(-) Bob Nelson
- He and
his wife live on the same block as the proposed site.
- The
offer the new design proposed will still have a shadow impact on his house.
- It is
still possible to lower f the building three more feet.
- If a
north lightwell could be built, it would allow a lot more sunlight to his
property.
- Please
adopt their settlement offer.
(-) Joann Nelson
- She
lives next door to the proposed building.
- She and
her husband have done a lot of renovations to their home in order to let more
light come into their home. This has
taken a lot of money and effort.
- The
proposed construction will block much sunlight into their home.
- There
will also be a considerable amount of heat lost. It will be very cold.
- It is a
very noble cause to take an elderly parent into your home yet it doesn't have
to be such a tall home.
(-) Michael Moran
- He is
also a next-door neighbor on the uphill side.
- He would
like the Commission to require that all deck rails on the proposed project be
as open as possible in order to have more sunlight come into his property.
- Another
request would be that all the vertical walls should be set back five feet.
- Please
adopt their settlement envelope.
(-) Joe Butler
-
Displayed a design, which shows the spirit and intent of the Commission.
- The
fifth level still needs to be mitigated regarding the light and air issues.
ACTION: Take
DR and approve project with open railings (all around) and a 15-foot setback on
vertical wall.
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
NAYES: Fay
E. REGULAR CALENDAR
17a. 2000.1269RB (BAUMAN:
558-6287)
INDIA
BASIN INDUSTRIAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA PLAN AMENDMENT/ 3433 THIRD STREET)
- Request for a finding of consistency with the General Plan for an amendment
to the Redevelopment Plan for the India Basin Industrial Park. The amendment would apply to Lot 23 in
Assessor’s Block 5203, 3433 Third Street at the southeast corner of Cargo
Way. It would allow up to 50,000 gross
square feet of Retail and Business Services uses (a category that includes
business and professional offices) and would reduce the parking requirement to
one space for each 1,000 occupied square feet of Business Services space, and
one space for each 7,000 gross square feet of telecommunication space. It would reduce the loading requirement to
one space for each 100,000 square feet of Retail, Business Services, and
Telecommunications space. This
amendment would enable the construction of a proposed development at 3433 Third
Street, described below.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Find the proposed amendment of the Redevelopment Plan
consistent with the General Plan.
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of February 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S):
(+)
Stanley Miraoka – Project Manager
- The proposed plan came about as a result of the
Agency processing the allocations of this building.
- The existing plans permit up to 196,000 square feet
of retail and business space.
- The bulk exists at Bay View Plaza.
- This is an appropriate plan amendment.
- They have made a determination that the limitation
on the parking and loading requirements are fine.
- The building will be mixed use--commercial and
retail.
(-) Sue
Hestor
- At the hearing of the BOS some important
information came up. This building will
take about 25 megawatts of electricity.
- In San Francisco there has been a proposal to
replace the power station in the Bay View Hunters Point area.
- If the Potrero Hill plan comes about, this power
station will not be able to be closed and many people will still suffer from
health problems.
- This project has to abide by the energy standards
imposed on the City.
(+) Steve
Vettel
- The energy demand on this project will be 7
megawatts of electricity not 25.
- What's before the Commission is the office and the
retail plan.
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas,
Theoharis
RESOLUTION: 16106
17b. 2000.1269RB (BAUMAN: 558-6287)
INDIA
BASIN INDUSTRIAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA PLAN AMENDMENT/ 3433 THIRD STREET)
– Lot 23 in Assessor’s Block 5203.
Authorization of up to 42,000 square feet of office space from the
"Reserve for Smaller Buildings" established in Planning Code Section
321 (Office Development Annual Limit).
This notice shall also set forth an initial determination of net
addition of gross square feet of office space, pursuant to Planning Code
Sections 313.4 and 314.4. The
proposal is the construction of 3433 Third Street (at the southeast corner of
Cargo Way), a five-story building containing an approximately 111,000 square
feet of telecommunications switching facility; 42,000 square feet of office
space; 7,500 square feet of retail space; a 6,000-square-foot public plaza and
73 parking spaces. The site is in the
India Basin Industrial Park Redevelopment Area, and in the M-2 Zoning District
and the 65-J Height and Bulk District
Preliminary
Recommendation: Allocate up to 42,000 square feet of office space from the "Reserve for
Smaller Buildings."
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of February 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): Same as those listed in item 17a.
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas,
Theoharis
RESOLUTION: 16107
18a. 2000.171CX (MILLER:
558-6344)
466
BUSH STREET - north side between Grant Avenue and Kearny Street, Lot 42 in
Assessor’s Block 270. Request for
Determination of Compliance pursuant to Section 309 with respect to a proposal
to construct a ten-story Hotel approximately 99 feet in height and containing
approximately 91 guest rooms, also involving a request for exceptions to Planning
Code standards for building height and bulk (Sections 263.8 and 272, et seq.) in a C-3-R (Downtown Retail)
District and a 80-130-F Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Approval with conditions
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of February 22, 2001)
SPEAKER(S):
(+)
Steve Nixon
- He is available to answer any questions.
(+)
Alice Carrey
- She is the owner of the adjacent building.
- There were several points missed by the
planner.
- The project sponsor shall protect various
parts of her building.
- The project sponsor and she agreed on various
items.
- There is a fence, which is badly
deteriorated, and posters are always being posted.
- People who post posters on the fence of
the empty site at 466 Bush make a mess and get glue on the stone of her bldg.
ACTION: Approved Under Section 309.
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas,
Theoharis
MOTION: 16108
18b. 2000.171CX (MILLER:
558-6344)
466
BUSH STREET - north side between Grant Avenue and Kearny Street, Lot 42 in
Assessor’s Block 270. Request for
authorization of a Conditional Use for modification of a previously imposed
condition (time limit for start of construction Motion No. 14797) for a hotel
containing approximately 91 rooms in a C-3-R (Downtown Retail) District and a
80-130-F Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Approval with conditions
(Continued from Regular
Meeting of February 22, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): Same as those listed in item 18a.
ACTION: Approved with amended
conditions (in addition to the Jobs Housing Linkage).
AYES: Baltimore, Fay, Joe, Salinas, Theoharis
NAYES: Chinchilla
MOTION: 16109
F. SPECIAL
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW HEARING
Following
the Regular Calendar, the Planning Commission convened into a Special
Discretionary Review (DR) Hearing.
Note: The
next item followed item 17a and b.
19. 2001.0078D (DiBARTOLO:
558-6291)
1831 - 1837 STOCKTON - west side between Lombard and Greenwich Streets, Lot 005 in
Assessor’s Block 0076. Request for Discretionary
Review of Building Permit Application No. 2000/10/12/2890, to convert a
four-unit building to a three-unit building in an RM-1 (Residential, Mixed Low
Density) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District. Specifically, the proposal will merge two
dwelling units on the third floor. No
exterior alterations are proposed.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve building permit
as submitted.
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of February 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S):
(+) Michael Levit – Project Sponsor
- During
the previous hearing, he presented signatures of about 50 neighbors expressing
support for this project.
- He and
his fiancée began looking for a single-family home and after a while came to
the conclusion that this was not going to happen.
- They
were finally able to make a down payment on this property.
- The
project would be vacant without having done any evictions or Ellis Act.
- Merging
the two units didn't seem to be a problem.
- They
have gone through all the proper procedures.
- They are
pouring a lot of money into a home that they are not sure will continue to be
their home.
- They ask
that the Commission approve their project as designed.
(+) Joe O'Donaghue
- The
space where this couple will be living is not a lot.
- They are
also renovating the other unit in order to have some rental income.
- It is
hard for couples to be able to afford to live in this City.
ACTION: Do
not take DR and approve project as proposed.
Motion Failed.
AYES: Baltimore, Fay, Joe
NAYES: Chinchilla,
Salinas, Theoharis
ACTION: Because the request for discretionary
review (DR) did not obtain a majority vote of the Commission, the request for
DR fails.
20. 1999.811D (PUTRA:
558-6233)
1660 MISSION STREET,
west side between South Van Ness Avenue and
Thirteenth Street, Lots 5 and 6 in Assessor’s Block 3512. Request for
Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2000 0515 0033, to
construct a six-story above grade level, approximately 76-feet-tall addition
with 25,365 gross square feet of office and 5,073 square feet of parking at
grade level. This is an addition to the existing 92,000-gross-square foot city
office building, of which 22,610 square feet are in an underground garage, in a
C-M (Heavy Commercial) District; and a 105-J Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve the Building
Permit Application as revised.
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of February 22, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Without hearing, continued to April 5, 2001
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas,
Theoharis
G. PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of the public may address the
Commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject
matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your
opportunity to address the Commission will be afforded when the item is reached
in the meeting with one exception. When
the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members
of the public were allowed to testify and the Commission has closed the public
hearing, your opportunity to address the Commission must be exercised during
the Public Comment portion of the Calendar.
Each member of the public may address the Commission for up to three
minutes.
The Brown Act forbids a commission from taking
action or discussing any item not appearing on the posted agenda, including
those items raised at public comment.
In response to public comment, the Commission is limited to:
(1)
responding to statements made or questions posed by members of the public; or
(2)
requesting staff to report back on a matter at a subsequent meeting; or
(3)
directing staff to place the item on a future agenda. (Government Code Section 54954.2(a))
Joe O'Donaghue – Residential Builders
Re:
- When
left-wing groups take power they become more reactionary than their right-wing
counterparts.
- This is
not a progressive City -- it is regressive.
- Both of
these contentions were validated at a Board of Supervisor's hearing recently.
- The Land
Use Committee holds hearings at the same time as the Planning Commission
hearings. This is an unprecedented
move.
- The
Board staff guaranteed him personally that because of the large body of people
expected, the hearing would be held in the large hearing room.
- Three
minutes per person have always been allocated to both sides.
- Ms.
Hestor has come before the Planning Department requesting that the public
receive due notice on information regarding land use matters 10 to 30 days in
advance, something that the new Board of Supervisors has conveniently forgotten
about.
-
Regardless of what the press has said, what happened was that he and other
members arrived early for the moratorium hearing and were sitting quietly in
the large Board of Supervisor's chambers.
They were then informed that the hearing was changed to a smaller
hearing room. He left the chambers and
went to the smaller hearing room. He
requested a point of order on the parliamentary rule. Mr. McGoldrick denied his point of order since the meeting had
not yet begun. He asked Mr. McGoldrick
why the meeting had been moved to a smaller hearing room. Mr. McGoldrick refused to answer but later
mentioned that it was for security reasons. He then later asked the sheriff to
escort me out of the hearing room.
- His
organization has never been disruptive in any of the meetings they attend.
Adjournment: 4:40
p.m.
THE DRAFT MINUTES ARE PROPOSED FOR ADOPTION AT THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THURSDAY, MARCH 22, 2001.