Meeting Minutes
Commission Chambers - Room 400
City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett
Place
Thursday, January 18, 2001
1:30 PM
Regular Meeting
PRESENT: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay,
Joe, Mills, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
NOTE: The Commission voted to have Commissioner
Chinchilla act as Chairperson for today's hearing.
THE
MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY COMMISSIONER CHINCHILLA AT 1:40 p.m.
STAFF IN
ATTENDANCE: Gerald G. Green - Director of Planning; Larry Badiner - Zoning
Administrator; Andrea Wong; Thomas Wang; Nora Priego - Transcription Secretary;
Isolde Wilson – Acting Commission Secretary
A. ITEMS PROPOSED FOR CONTINUANCE
1. Election of Officers
(Proposed for
Continuance to January 25, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to January 25, 2001
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay,
Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
2. 2000.1049DDD (WONG: 558-6381)
85 SYCAMORE STREET
- Request for Discretionary Review
for 85 Sycamore Street, Lot 045 in Assessor’s Block 3576, on Building Permit
Application No. 2000.06.20.2307S - a proposal for the construction of a new
3-unit building in a RH-3 zoning and 50-X height/bulk zoning district. The proposal is to remove the two existing, one-story structures
(one two-unit building and one one-unit building) and to construct a new
three-unit building with three legally independent parking spaces, accessed
from Sycamore Street in a RH-3 zoning and 50-X height/bulk zoning district.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed for Continuance
to January 25, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to January 25, 2001
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay,
Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
3. 1999.770DDDDD (WANG:
558‑6335)
567 ‑
569 SANCHEZ STREET, east side between 19th and Hancock Streets; Lot 032
in Assessor's Block 3585. The
proposal is to demolish an existing single‑family dwelling with a
detached garage and construct a new three-story plus attic over garage, two‑family
dwelling, in an RH‑3 (Residential, House, Three‑Family) District
and a 40‑X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed
for Continuance to February 1, 2001)
NOTE: Placed in Calendar in
Error. No Action Required.
4. 2000.654D (YOUNG:
558-6346)
412
LOMBARD STREET, north side between Grant Avenue and Stockton Street, Lot
010 in Assessor’s Block 0062 -- Request for Discretionary Review of Building
Permit Application No. 2000/03/03/3468 to construct a two-story vertical
addition to an existing one-story over basement single-family dwelling in an
RH-3 (Residential, House, Three-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk
District.
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of December 7, 200)
(Proposed
for Continuance to February 1, 2001)
SPEAKER(S):
(-)
Chuck Thomas
- He requests that this
case be continued to February 15, 2001.
- The project sponsor
did not provide the plans necessary for him to be prepared for this hearing.
- The poster did not
state a change of the hearing date.
(+) Amad Mohazed
- He is the project
architect for this project.
- He would like for this
hearing to be heard as soon as possible.
- He does
not oppose a continuance for this item.
ACTION: Continued to February 8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay,
Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
5. 2000.877D (NIKITAS: 558-6306)
240 - 16TH AVENUE
- north side between California and Clement Streets, Lot 037 in Assessor’s
Block 1418. Request for Discretionary
Review for Building Permit Application No.2000/07/25/6060. The proposal would add a four-story
extension to the rear of the existing single family dwelling, and would
reconfigure the building interior to create a second dwelling unit in an RH-2
(Residential, House, Two-Family) Dwelling and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: pending.
(Continued from Regular
Meeting of December 7, 2000)
(Proposed for
Continuance to February 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to February 8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay,
Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
6. 2000.677C (CHIN: 575-6897)
373 BROADWAY STREET -
southeast corner of Broadway Street and Bartol Street; Lot 018 in Assessor's Block 0164: -- Request for Conditional Use
authorization pursuant to Section 714.83 of the Planning Code to install a
total of twelve antennas and a base transceiver station on an existing
four-story over basement building, as part of AT&T's wireless cellular network in the Broadway
(Neighborhood Commercial) District and a 65-A Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Approval with
Conditions
(Continued from
Regular Meeting of January 11, 2001)
(Proposed for
Continuance to February 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to February 8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay,
Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
7. 2000.1026C (WOODS:
558‑6315)
4314
CALIFORNIA STREET - north side, between Fifth and Sixth Avenues, Lot 14 in
Assessor's Block 1365 ‑‑ Request for Conditional Use Authorization
under Sections 303 and 710.27 of the Planning Code to extend the bar hours of
an existing bar and restaurant establishment (the V Pub Bar and Grill) from
11:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. in an NC‑1 (Neighborhood Commercial Cluster
District) Zoning District and 40‑X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Pending
(Proposed
for Continuance to February 22, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to February 8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay,
Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
8. 2000.739E (BLOMGREN:
558‑5979)
298 SHIPLEY STREET
- northeast corner of Shipley and Sixth Street, Assessor's Block 3753, Lots 122
‑‑ Appeal of a Preliminary Negative Declaration. Proposed construction of a three‑story building
containing a total of 32 live/work units and 32 off‑street parking spaces. The site currently has a vacant one‑story
auto sales building, which would be demolished. The new building would reach a maximum height of 45 feet in a 40‑X
height/bulk district. The site is with
a South of Market RSD (Residential/Service) Mixed Use District, an MUHZ (Mixed
Use Housing Zone) interim zoning district, and a 40‑X Height and Bulk
District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Uphold Preliminary
Recommendation
(Proposed for Continuance to March 8, 2001)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Continued to March 8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay,
Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
B. COMMISSIONERS' QUESTIONS AND MATTERS
9. Consideration of
Adoption - draft minutes of December 7 and 14, 2000
ACTION: Approved with correction advised
by Commissioner Joe.
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay,
Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
10. Proposed adoption of Planning Commission
hearing schedule for 2001
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Approved as amended
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay,
Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
11. Commission
Matters
None
C. DIRECTOR'S REPORT
12. Director's
Announcements
None
13. Review
of Past Week's Events at the Board of Supervisors and Board of Appeals
BOA None
BOS
Re: Live/Work to Loft Housing Legislation
- The Board considered legislation
by Supervisors' Daly, Amiano and Maxwell that would establish a 6-month
moratorium on the consideration of live/work units. A companion piece would prohibit any action on these applications
and would create a retroactive period of 60 days. Any applications that were before the Commission that have not
been approved cannot be approved within that period of time.
- This
legislation was just referred to the Department yesterday (1/17/01).
- This
legislation affects item 16 on today's calendar.
- He would like to have
the Commission consider continuing item 16 to allow the director and the Zoning
Administrator to consider this legislation.
D.
REGULAR CALENDAR
14. (WILSON: 558-6602)
DWELLING UNIT MERGER POLICY
Policy discussion
on the removal of dwelling units.
Consider adopting criteria for Discretionary Review of building permit
applications to remove a legal dwelling unit.
SPEAKER(S):
(-) Dean and Catherine Akazawa
- They purchased a property on
Bush Street last year.
- They would like for the
Commissioners not to penalize projects that are in the pipeline.
- Their project would allow for a
family of six to live as one family by merging units.
- They have spent considerable
time and resources to merge the units.
They are not doing this for business purposes. They have not displaced anyone.
- They were supposed to have
started their project in September.
Their contractor advised them that the project would last about 3 months
but because of this new policy, they haven't been able to even start their
project.
- His wife is expecting twins and
this is causing a lot of hardship and stress to their lives.
(-) Susanne Beilicke – Sanger and
Olson
- They have not had an opportunity
to review the criteria.
- She would like to request that
this matter is continued for two weeks to allow for through revision of the
criteria and allow for a presentation.
(-) Jeremy Paul
- He represents small property
owners.
- He would like to alert this
Commission of the consequences if this policy is approved.
- The courts, City Attorney and
BOA are clear that they will not prevent Ellis Acted properties from being
merged.
- There will be a substantial loss
of housing because of this kind of action.
- Please consider a way to avoid
the loss of housing.
(-) Randy Shaw – Director of the
Tenderloin Housing Clinic
- Housing is lost with mergers.
- Homes should remain with the
original configuration.
- There is a scarcity of rental
housing.
(-) Kim Stryker
- She is one of two-co chairs of
- She is amazed at the amount of
interference the City puts for homeowners.
- They supply 1/3 of the City's
rental housing.
- They end of taking their units
off the market because of all the policies that need to be adhered to.
- Homeowners should be able to use
their homes for growing families.
- Homeowners would like to merge
illegal units in order to make them legal.
- It's not of the City's business
how much these rental units are.
- She would like the Commission to
reevaluate the policy and not put so many burdens on property owners.
(-) Courtney Clarkson
- She purchased a 2-unit building
recently which was originally a 1 unit home and her intention was to make as it
was before.
- It seems like the Commission is
making it difficult for a small amount of people to merge rental housing.
- At the corner of Fillmore and
Lombard there was a gas station, a 1-story building was constructed there. Enormous volume spaces are being built as
lofts instead of rental housing units.
(-) Andrew Zaks
- He is an attorney for small
property owners.
- There will be unintended affects
that this policy will produce.
- There will be more Ellic Act
cases.
- He would like the Commission to
reconsider this policy.
- He believes that this policy is
a bad policy.
(-) J.B. Alijani
- He is a small property owner.
- This policy gives the reason to
not add rental units in a house.
- He agrees with the previous
speaker that homeowners Ellis Acts units.
- It will be bad for San Francisco
to have all these Ellis Act buildings.
- Ways should be looked for so people
can have rental housing.
(-) Will Spritzma
- He is upset that he has to take
time out of his life to come here and protect his property.
- If these types of policies are
going to be implemented, properties who were started from a certain date should
not qualify for Discretionary Review.
(-) Joe O'Donahue
- He sympathizes with families who
want to merge units because their family is growing.
- This policy should be addressed
at the Board of Supervisors.
- This Commission should not try
to solve this problem.
(-) Robin Levit
-
He owns property just a few blocks from here.
- He purchased the property with
the intention of merging the units.
- His parents are very old and
they saw this as providing housing for them.
- People, who have bought these
buildings, purchased them with the idea of merging the units.
- Small property owners should not
be penalized.
(-) Andy Esparza
- He owns property. He purchased the property after renting it
for a few years.
- These types of regulations are
causing him to get education on how these policies work.
- He will find out what the Ellis
Act means to him and what the implications are.
- He has tenants that have lived
in the property for many years. He
won't hesitate to Ellis Act the tenants he has currently.
(-) Lou Lecnito
- This is terrible to have such
hard restrictions on small people that can help their children.
(-) Brett Gladstone
- He is an attorney. He has had a number of calls from homeowners
so he can represent them.
- The costs for people to go
through a Discretionary Review is quite high.
- People get nervous and have a
hard time speaking before the Commission.
- He would like the Commission to
consider this policy.
(-) Craig Lipton
- He is a small property owner.
- He is affected by this policy.
- He understands that there is a
housing crisis map.
(-) Linda Allen
- She is a small property owner.
- She is confused and uncertain to
question the intelligence of this policy or the sincerity of the Commissioners.
- This new rule will cause more
Ellis Acts and not apply to the Commission at all. There will be more illegal units created.
(-) John Bardis
- The people who have spoken today
have all mentioned that there is a housing crisis.
- The existing housing stock is
the more affordable housing stock in the City.
- What is the better
solution? Maybe the City has not been
clear in the way the City has developed this policy.
- This is something that should be
followed up by the Board.
- A clear solution, in ordinance
form, should be established.
- People, who purchased prior to
adoption of first policy, should receive priority to go before the Commission.
- Staff should provide help to
property owners to fill out forms, get information, etc.
ACTION: Approved with modifications. Staff to report on January 25, 2001 on the
status of DR's, which are in the pipeline for dwelling unit mergers. A special hearing would probably be
scheduled just for these types of cases in order to expedite these cases.
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay,
Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
15. 1999.346TZ (MALTZER:
558-6391)
ADOPTION
OF NEW POLICIES REGARDING OFFICE USE AND CONVERSION OF LIVE/WORK (LOFT HOUSING)
WITHIN INTERIM INDUSTRIAL PROTECTION ZONES AND MIXED USE HOUSING ZONES -
Consideration of adopting new policies to discourage office development and to
further discourage the conversion of live/work to office within the Interim
Controls boundary area. These new
policies are to supplement existing policies previously adopted August 5, 1999
(CPC Res. 14861).
Preliminary
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution creating new policies within Interim Zones
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of December 14, 2000)
SPEAKER(S):
(-) Art Evans
- He showed a map of a property on
King and Berry Streets (AKA 601 King Street).
- In 1998 they were approved to
build these housing units.
- They have spent millions of
dollars on this project.
- Had there not been this backup
of these allocations, they would have received an allocation.
- Their project would have
received a permit before December 31, 2000.
- There is no opposition to this
project.
(-) Arthur Chan
- He is the owner of properties of
7th and King Streets.
- They bought a warehouse about 30
years ago to provide for their import/export business.
- The property is set for
retirement since it's in poor physical condition.
- It is not good economic sense to
renovate the property.
- Although they might relocate to
another part of the Bay Area since their business requires it be located on a
pier.
- E.F. Evans has agreed to
purchase the site.
- He has been a loyal businessman
of San Francisco and it's not fare that this decision will have a tremendous
impact on him.
(-) Steve Vettel
- This is a rather unusual case.
- The EIR of this project was
certified in August. The project
sponsor was not able to develop this property because the office allocation had
run out so they had to wait for this year in order to qualify.
- He submitted a paragraph, which
he would like to have the Commission consider as an amendment.
- He would like cases to be
considered which were ready to be considered by the Commission before the
policy was enacted.
(-) Robert Meyers
- He is an architect and a
city-planning consultant.
- He would like to place an
operative date of November 7 so projects before this date should be exempt.
(-) Joe O'Donahue
- There are cases, which should be
exempt of this policy.
- Many cases have been at the
Planning Department for many years.
- If an exemption is made, the
Commission will not set a precedent.
- He agrees with the Director of
the Planning Department on this policy.
(-) Sue Hestor
- This approval of this policy is
ridiculous based on the history of the department.
- There have been huge
controversies on Industrial Zones.
- The Department is discouraging
offices in the Mixed Use Housing Zones.
- The language of Potrero Hill was
totally eliminated.
- She does not think that this is
such a great thing.
ACTION: Approve project with the exception of the Evans
Project.
AYES: Baltimore
NAYES: Chinchilla, Joe, Fay, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
ACTION: Approved as per staff recommendation
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Joe, Fay, Salinas
ABSENT: Thoharis
MOTION: 16079
16. 2000.1007T (LORD:
558-6311)
LIVE-WORK
TO LOFT HOUSING AMENDMENT - Consideration of adoption of amendments to Part
II, Chapter II, of the San Francisco Municipal Code (Planning Code) by amending
Sections 102.7 and 102.13 redefining "live/work" units as "loft
housing" and classifying them as residential uses; repealing Section 233
regarding live/work; adding Section 232 to establish requirements for loft
housing that would subject it to some existing live/work controls except that
there would be no restriction on the nature of work which could be performed in
the unit so long as the use is permitted in the SSO (Service/Secondary Office)
Zoning District and no requirement that the occupant(s) work in the unit, would
require loft housing to comply with existing inclusionary housing policies,
would require loft housing in residential areas to comply with all requirements
for residential uses including the residential design guidelines, would require
loft housing constructed in areas not zoned residential to comply with
non-residential design guidelines and all requirements for residential uses
except for front setback and open space requirements, would establish
procedures for converting live/work units to non-residential uses, and would
establish loft housing, rear yard exposure requirements. This ordinance supersedes any inconsistent
Planning Commission policies.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Adopt the Draft Ordinance
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of January 11, 2001)
Item taken out of order. Followed item 13.
SPEAKER(S):
Joe O'Donahue
- He would suggest that item 15 be
looked at also and considered to be continued as well since both items are
related.
ACTION: Continued Indefinitely
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay, Salinas
NAYES: Joe
17a. 2000.265CV (WONG:
558-6381)
2940
FOLSOM STREET - west side, between 25th and 26th Streets; Lot 008 in
Assessor’s block 6525: Request for Conditional Use Authorization for a
Community Facility (kitchen incubator program) in a RH-2 (Residential, House,
Two-Family) Zoning District, under Planning Code Section 209.4 (a), and for the
creation of three new dwelling units at a density not to exceed 1 unit per
1,500 square feet of lot area in a RH-2 Zoning District, under Planning Code
Section 209.1 (g). The subject property also falls within a 40-X Height/Bulk
District. The proposal is to renovate
the existing commercial property into a kitchen incubator program, run by the
Women’s Initiative for Self-Employment.
This 4,270 gross square foot community facility will run programs to
assist participants with starting and operating catering/food production micro
enterprise businesses. Three new dwelling units are proposed for construction
at the rear of the property. Each new
unit will provide a required parking space, accessed from Horace Street.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
SPEAKER(S):
(+) Jane Seagal – Project Sponsor
- She purchased this property
about a year and a half ago.
- This project would help women
begin their own catering business.
- She is not motivated solely by
profit.
- She would like to have the
Commission consider approving this project.
(+) Barbara Johnson – Co-Founder
and Executive Director of the Womens Initiative for Self-Employment.
- Womens Initiative will lease the
commercial kitchen space from Jane Seagal.
- This project is referred to as
MIKI (Mission Kitchen) and will help low-income women receive self-employment,
industry-specific training and be able to start their own businesses.
- In 1990, Womens Initiative
started ALAS (Alternativas para Latinas en Autosuficiencia).
(+) Paula Artager – Project
Architect
- They have met with neighbors and
neighborhood groups regarding this project.
- Displayed a model of the
proposed project.
(+) Elizabeth Milos
- She works with ALAS.
- She has two clients who are in
support of the project and live near the project site.
(+) Etelina Sanchez
- Spoke in Spanish
- She is a member of ALAS.
- Submitted a translation of her
statement to the Commissioners.
(+) Guadalupe Avila
- Spoke in Spanish
- She is also a member of ALAS.
- She believes that this is a very
important project for the community.
- She has tried many times to
establish her own catering business but has not had the opportunity to do so.
- This site is perfect because
it's close to her family.
- Submitted a translation of her
statement to the Commissioners.
(+) Patty Chan
- President of the Women's
Foundation
- The Women's Foundation has
provided funds of various projects in the Mission District.
- This project will provide a
great opportunity for women of Latino descent to be able to start their own
businesses.
- She urges the Commission to
approve this project.
(+) Julie Dorff
- She has lived in the Mission
District for many years.
- Her main point is that the
neighborhood is healthier and safer.
- She would be proud to have the
incubator project on her block.
- This is a great opportunity for
Latino women to start their own business and survive in this economy.
- She agrees to have this project
in her back yard.
(+) Wilma Espinoza – Board Member
of Womens Initiative
- She has participated in the ALAS
project since it's initiation.
- This is such a wonderful project
for providing economic opportunities for Latino Women.
(-) Luisa Bradley
- The area is a residential area
and she would like to keep it that way.
- Although the idea is a good one,
it should be constructed in another place.
(-) Agustin Acedo
- This is the first time he speaks
in public so he is a little nervous.
- This area is not good for a
project, which involves cooking.
- This area could be done in any
other place.
(+) Brett Gladstone
- He won't speak unless the
Commission has any questions.
ACTION: Approved
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
MOTION: 16080
17b. 2000.265CV
(WONG: 558-6381)
2940
FOLSOM STREET - west side, between 25th and 26th Streets; Lot 008 in
Assessor’s block 6525: Request for a
rear yard variance to construct three new dwelling units in the required rear
yard, under Planning Code Section 134 (a) (2).
SPEAKER(S): See Item 17a.
ACTION: Variance taken under advisement by Zoning Administrator
18. 1997.433A (KOMETANI:
558-6478)
22 ALTA
STREET - north side between Montgomery and Sansome Streets. Lot 34A in Assessor’s Block 106 -- Request
for Certificate of Appropriateness authorization, under Article 10 of the
Planning Code, to construct a new, one-unit, residential building, two-stories
at the front (Alta Street) elevation and five-stories at the rear in the
Telegraph Hill Historic District. The
subject property is zoned RH-3 (House, Three-Family) District and is in a 40-X
Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with
Conditions
(Continued
from Regular Meeting of November 16, 2000)
ACTION: Continued to February 8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
E.
SPECIAL DISCRETIONARY REVIEW HEARING
At
Approximately 5:00 PM the
Planning Commission will convene into a Special Discretionary Review (DR)
Hearing to hear and act on Discretionary Review matters. Procedures governing Special DR Hearings are
as follow: DR Requestor(s) are provided with up to five (5) minutes for a presentation and those in
support of the DR Requestor(s) are provided with up to three (3) minutes
each. The Project Sponsor is then
provided with up to five (5) minutes for a presentation and those in support of
the project are provided with up to three (3) minutes each. At the conclusion, each side (not each
person) is provided with 2 minutes for a rebuttal. Those cases that are scheduled on this calendar prior to 5:00 PM,
but have not been called or heard by 5:00 PM, could be continued to a later
time or date as determined by the Commission.
19. 2000.923DD (WANG:
558‑6335)
575
VALLEY STREET - south side between Castro and Diamond Streets; Lot 019 in
Assessor's Block 7536. The proposal
is to demolish an existing single‑family dwelling and construct a new two‑story
over garage and basement, single‑family dwelling, in an RH‑1
(Residential, House, Single‑Family) District and a 40‑X Height and
Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve the project as
submitted.
SPEAKER(S):
(-) Allan Kessler - DR Requestor
- The proposed structure is larger
than the other homes in the neighborhood.
- The design of the structure
makes it appealing yet it is too large for this neighborhood.
- He showed a diagram of the
homes, which have a rear deck.
- He has lived in this
neighborhood for many years and has seen the neighborhood change throughout the
years, yet this house is just too large.
- The DR requestors spent time
with the developers. The revisions made
to the original plans are merely cosmetic and not related to the bulk of the
house.
- Showed an image of a shadow
study made.
(-) Richard Peterson
- The proposed project is totally
out-of-scale in comparison to the rest of the houses.
- This house will have 6
bathrooms, where the rest of the houses in the neighborhood only have one.
- Revisions made to the plans are
only cosmetic.
- An area in the house where a bar
is planned could easily be converted into a kitchen. There are other areas of the house, which could easily be
converted to other things; therefore, the property could be converted into an
apartment building.
- The height of this house will
impact the public open space.
- This is the perfect example of a
mega mansion.
(-) Richard Estes Richardson
- He is one of a few people who
object to this project.
- He lives down the hill of the
proposed project.
- He has lived there for about 30
years
- This project will change the
character of the neighborhood.
- The height of the house will be
intrusive.
- He supports the design review.
- He would have liked to have more
neighbors receive notification of this project.
(-) Harvey Rudman
- He lives in the neighborhood.
- He feels that the developers
have address some of his concerns.
- The building will create a wall,
which will run across most of the property.
- There was no attempt to contact
homeowners regarding this project.
- The homeowners and not the
developers requested the meetings that were set up.
(+) Brett Gladstone
- There were a total of 5 meetings
with the neighbors. Two were formal and
3 were informal.
- Most of the cut backs were on
the side of the project.
- Bay windows were removed
- Many people are coming to him
because they can't seem to find a house that is large enough for growing
families.
(+) Steve Antenaros - Project
Architect
- December 21 (Winter Solstice)
would be the worst-case scenario which is when the sun is at its lowest
therefore shadows at anytime during the day are the worst that it would be
during any other day of the year.
- All the revisions of the
original plan were taken into consideration in regards to impact to the
neighbors.
(+) Joe O'Donahue
- Every building this architect
has designed has been good to the neighborhood.
- This building does not max out.
- This project should be approved.
ACTION: Do not take DR and approve project as submitted.
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay, Salinas
NAYES: Joe
ABSENT: Theoharis
20. 2000.1029D (WONG:
558-6381)
481
ARKANSAS STREET, Request for Discretionary Review
for Building Permit Application No. 200003245373 for the property at 481
Arkansas Street, Lot 012A in Assessor’s Block 4068. The proposal is to add one dwelling unit to an existing single
family, two-story residence by constructing a one floor plus penthouse vertical
addition. The subject property falls
within a RH-2 (Residential, Two-family) Zoning District and a 40-X Height /
Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Take Discretionary Review and approve the project with
modifications.
SPEAKER(S):
(-) Tom Davie
- He lives on the block of the
proposed construction.
- He read a timeline of events
since September of 2000.
- He objects to the side yard
entrance to the proposed lower unit.
- People who will be coming up and
down the stairs will be able to look into his kitchen and dining room.
- Even if the stairs were
enclosed, the design would just not fit in that space.
- Most of the new houses on this
street are two-stories over garage.
- He does not feel that he is
incorrect in quoting something that Mr. De La Cruz sent to him.
(-) Craig Forrestor
- He has lived in Potrero Hill
since 1989.
- He has objections about this
project: this will cause a negative affect on the look of the neighborhood; the
construction is too large for the neighborhood; the structure will impact
sunlight; privacy of adjacent neighbors.
- He strongly believes in wanting
to keep the look of the neighborhood.
- The conversion of two units will
be a loss of dwelling for San Francisco.
- Because of the fact that the new
construction is about double compared to the other houses, it will impact the
sunlight to these houses.
(-) Heather Fitzgibons
- This project will not add any
positive value to the other homes in this neighborhood.
- This large structure will change
the feeling of the neighborhood.
- She works at home and spends a
lot of time there; this construction will invade her privacy and block the
sunlight coming into her home.
(-) Alain Demour
- He lives in the neighborhood.
- He purchased his property there
because of the look of the neighborhood.
- The construction will invade his
privacy.
(+) Phil De la Cruz
- He owns the property with his
son.
- Staff has requested that this
project be modified.
- Since November of 2000, he
hasn't been able to come before the Commission because of family emergencies.
- The construction would add value
to the other properties.
- Displaced a diagram comparing
the height of the adjacent homes.
ACTION: Take DR and approve project with modifications proposed
by staff.
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
21. 2000.1118DDDD (NIKITAS:
558-6306)
33
WALNUT STREET, between Pacific Avenue and Jackson
Streets, Lot 002 in Assessor’s Block 0972, Request for Discretionary Review of
Building Permit Application No. 2000/05/01/9654, proposing to demolish existing
rear deck and bay window, and to add a rear extension 19’-10" deep at the
first floor and crawl space level below and extending 15’-10" deep at the
second-story with a roof deck above and a new attic level dormer at the front
of the house, in an RH-1 (Residential, House, One-Family) District and a 40-X
Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary
Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve project as
submitted
ACTION: Continued to February 8, 2001
AYES: Baltimore, Chinchilla, Fay, Joe, Salinas
ABSENT: Theoharis
F. PUBLIC
COMMENT
At this time, members of the public may address the
Commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject
matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your
opportunity to address the Commission will be afforded when the item is reached
in the meeting with one exception. When
the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members
of the public were allowed to testify and the Commission has closed the public
hearing, your opportunity to address the Commission must be exercised during
the Public Comment portion of the Calendar.
Each member of the public may address the Commission for up to three
minutes.
The Brown Act forbids a commission from taking
action or discussing any item not appearing on the posted agenda, including
those items raised at public comment.
In response to public comment, the commission is limited to:
(1)
responding to statements made or questions posed by members of the public; or
(2)
requesting staff to report back on a matter at a subsequent meeting; or
(3)
directing staff to place the item on a future agenda. (Government Code Section 54954.2(a))
Abdalla Megahed
Re: Homelessness and a new San Francisco Flea
Market
- He is of American-Egyptian
descent.
- He has
spent various years as a human rights activist.
- He has
become the strongest advocate of the homeless.
- He is
thankful to President Clinton for giving this City 1 billion dollars to help
the homeless.
- His plan
is to start a flea market where people would pay $25.00 for a space; therefore,
he would be able to raise money for the homeless.
Adjournment:
6:18 p.m.
THE DRAFT
MINUTES ARE PROPOSED FOR ADOPTION AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2001.