SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Without hearing, item continued to November 13, 2003
AYES: Antonini, Feldstein, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford Bell, Boyd, W. Lee
3a. 20003.0904DV (J. MILLER: (415) 558-6344)
937 - 939 JACKSON STREET - south side between Powell and Mason; Lot 028 in Assessor's Block 0191 - Mandatory Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2003 0724 0318 proposing the demolition of a two-family dwelling and its replacement with a new building containing nine dwelling units. The subject property is located in an RM-3 (Mixed Residential, Medium Density) District and a 65-A Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do Not Take Discretionary Review and approve the Demolition Permit.
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Without hearing, item continued to November 20, 2003
AYES: Antonini, Feldstein, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford Bell, Boyd, W. Lee
3b. 2003.0535DV (J. MILLER: (415) 558-6344)
937 - 939 JACKSON STREET - south side between Powell and Mason Streets, Lot 028 in Assessor's Block 0191, in an RM-3 (Mixed Residential, Medium Density) District and a 65-A Height and Bulk District. The proposal is to construct a new four-story residential building containing nine dwelling units with a ground-floor garage containing nine off-street parking spaces, after demolition of the existing two-family dwelling. A portion of the garage level (only) is proposed to project approximately 19 feet five inches into the otherwise-required rear-yard area, leaving an area open and clear (from the ground up) of 15 feet behind it. This proposed space would be devoted to three additional bedrooms and bathrooms, which would be appended to the two two-bedroom dwelling units at the rear of the floor above, making one of them a for-bedroom unit and the other a three-bedroom unit. The upper surface of this rear projection would be finished off as a usable open space. The application requesting a Variance will be heard by the Zoning Administrator.
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Without hearing, item continued to November 20, 2003
AYES: Antonini, Feldstein, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford Bell, Boyd, W. Lee
4. 2003.0873D (G. CABREROS: (415) 558-6169)
2524-2540 ANZA STREET - north side between 16th and 17th Avenues; Lot 023 in Assessor's Block 1528 - Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2002.12.10.3209, proposing to add a new fourth floor to the existing three-story, four-unit building in an RM-1 (Residential, Mixed, Low-Density) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Pending
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Without hearing, item continued to January 8, 2004
AYES: Antonini, Feldstein, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford Bell, Boyd, W. Lee
5. 2003.0193D (R. CRAWFORD: (415) 558-6358)
244 GRANADA AVENUE - east side between Ocean and Holloway Avenues in Assessor's Block 6942 Lot 039 - Mandatory Discretionary Review, under the Planning Commission's policy requiring review of housing demolition of Demolition Permit Application No. 2002.10.28.0113, to demolish the existing one family house, in an RH-2 (Residential House, Two Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk district. There is a related proposal to construct a new two-family building.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do Not Take Discretionary Review and Approve the Demolition Permit.
(Continued from Regular Meeting of October 16, 2003)
(Proposed for Continuance to January 8, 2004)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Without hearing, item continued to January 8, 2004
AYES: Antonini, Feldstein, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford Bell, Boyd, W. Lee
6. 2003.1079D (R.CRAWFORD: (415) 558-6358)
3344 MARKET STREET - northeast side between Glendale and Clayton Streets. Assessor's Block 2717 Lot 004F. Mandatory Discretionary Review, under the Planning Commission's policy requiring review of housing demolition of Demolition Permit Application No. 2003.06.26.8149, to demolish the existing one family house and construct a new one family house in an RH-2 (Residential House, Two Family) District, and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review, and approve the Demolition Permit.
(Proposed for Continuance to January 8, 2004)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Without hearing, item continued to January 8, 2004
AYES: Antonini, Feldstein, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford Bell, Boyd, W. Lee
7. 2002.0418T (P. LORD: (415) 558-6311)
SECONDARY UNITS - Consideration of an Ordinance amending the San Francisco Planning Code by repealing Section 207.2 [Second Unit] in its entirety, adding new Section 207.2 and amending Section 209.1 to authorize one additional secondary unit limited to 750 square feet of gross floor area on a lot within 1250 feet of a Primary Transit Street or Transit Center and also within 1250 feet of a Neighborhood Commercial or Commercial zoning district, and constructed for the elderly or persons with physical disabilities and to prohibit the owner from legalizing an illegal unit pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance; by amending Sections 135(d), Table 151 of Section 151 and 307(g) to establish the amount of open space and adopting findings.
Preliminary Recommendation: Pending
SPEAKER(S):
Eileen Boken
- This legislation is unnecessary.
- The exemptions of 1984 are not "old" legislation.
- She is in favor of the continuance.
Marilyn Amini
- This legislation needs to be continued until the NCT rezoning legislation is put on the table at the same time for public review.
- She displayed a map of the NCT and Secondary Unit areas.
- Documentation shows that the Secondary Units legislation and the NCT legislation were drafted to implement and enable the Housing Element transit corridor proposal.
- Putting it in a mathematical formula: transit corridors equal secondary unit legislation plus the NCT legislation.
Jean Thomas
- She has lived in the Sunset district for about 30 years.
- She recently heard about this legislation.
- This item should definitely be continued and the Commission should be specific about what will happen after today.
Kate White - Housing Action Coalition
- She is disappointed that this item will be continued.
- She looks forward to hearing this item in the future.
- This legislation has made a lot of sense.
Frank Bauman
- This legislation should be continued.
- He believes that the public has not been very well informed.
- He just found out about it.
ACTION: Without hearing, item continued indefinitely
AYES: Antonini, Feldstein, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford Bell, Boyd, W. Lee
8. 2003. 0918D (E. TOPE: (415) 558-6316)
SPEAKER(S): None
ACTION: Discretionary Review Withdrawn.