18a. 2002.1295DD (R. CRAWFORD: (415) 558-6358)
567 SANCHEZ STREET - east side between 19th and Hancock Streets. Assessor's Block 3585 Lot 032 - Mandatory Discretionary Review under the Planning Commission's policy requiring review of housing demolition, of Demolition Permit Application No. 2002.07.31.2751 and a Mandatory Discretionary Review under the Planning Commission's Policy requiring review of demolitions, proposing to demolish an existing one story single-family dwelling in an RH-3 (Residential House, 3 Family) District, and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do Not Take Discretionary Review and Approve the Permit.
(Continued from Regular Meeting of May 22, 2003)
SPEAKER (S):
(-) Joseph Butler - Representing all five Discretionary Review Requestors
- There has been a settlement that was accepted by the project sponsor.
- He requested that the Commission take Discretionary Review to make the settlement agreement modifications part of the project.
- He displayed graphics of the issues that formed the settlement.
(-) David Cincotta - Representing Project Sponsor
- The Project Sponsor does concur with this agreement.
- He thanked the Planning Department for advising them of this settlement.
ACTION: Did not take Discretionary Review and approved the demolition.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
18b. 2002.1297DDDDD (R. CRAWFORD: (415) 558-6358)
567 SANCHEZ STREET - east side between 19th and Hancock Streets. Assessor's Block 3585 Lot 032 - Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2002.07.31.2759, to construct a new 4 story (three over garage) one family dwelling in an RH-3 (Residential House, 3 Family) District, and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Take Discretionary Review and Approve the Project with Modifications.
(Continued from Regular Meeting of May 22, 2003)
SPEAKER (S): Same as those listed for item 18a.
ACTION: Took Discretionary Review and approved the project subject to the condition that the permit reflect the new agreed upon plans.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
19a. 2003.0458D (G. CABREROS: (415) 558-6169)
463 - 26TH AVENUE - west side between Geary Boulevard and Clement Street, Lot 013 in Assessor's Block 1458 - Mandatory Discretionary Review under the Planning Commission's policy requiring review of all residential demolitions, of Demolition Permit Application No. 9714256 proposing to demolish a one-story, single-family residence in an RM-1 (Residential, Mixed, Low Density) District with a 40-X Height and Bulk District. Construction of a four-story building with 18 senior housing units and four parking spaces is also proposed on Lots 013, 014 and 015 under a separate permit.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve demolition.
SPEAKER (S)
(-) Ok Soon Key - Discretionary Review Requestor
- She requested that the proposed building not be tall.
- The proposed building will block all the sunlight to her house.
- There is a problem with parking in the area already.
- The Planning Department should have sent information, but she just received it yesterday.
- There are other people who wanted to come to the hearing but were unable to come because of the short notice.
(-) Patrick Key
- She read a letter from Ms. Del Carlo of the 400 Committee who is opposed to the demolition and proposed project.
(+) Shawn Gordon - Project Architect
- The Discretionary Review requestor states that with the proposed construction, her views will be blocked--but the Planning Department does not protect views.
- This project will not have a negative impact on the DR requestor's property in regards to sunlight.
- Senior housing is desperately needed in the City.
- This project meets all the criteria and will allow seniors to remain in their community.
- This project meets all the code requirements.
(+) Nicolas Hidechenko
- He and his wife have lived in San Francisco for 47 years.
- They are members of the parish.
- His mother lives by herself and this project would provide the adequate housing for his mother and allow her to remain in the parish.
- Senior housing in this location is very much needed by the parish.
(+) Nicolas Loukianoff - Holy Virgin Community
- He is the project manager of the parish.
- The community will own the project.
- Over 100 people who wish to be located at this new project have contacted him.
- Funding for this project comes from private organizations.
(+) Michael Klestoff - Russian Center
- Many of the members are up in their years and there are not many alternatives for them.
- He hopes that the Commission will help get very much needed housing.
(+) Myra Troyan
- They provide services to many documented senior citizens
- They are ready to provide legal, social and community services to the residents.
(+) Michael Wen
- He has lived in San Francisco for many years.
- Senior housing is very much needed and his father would greatly appreciate it.
- There are a lot of amenities near by as well as parking.
(+) Tamara Kotar
- She belongs to the Russian community.
- It is important for this project to be approved.
(+) Linda Tern - Russian-American Community Services
- It is important for lonely seniors to be involved in their community.
- Most seniors do not drive so they provide transportation to church.
- The location of this project is very good because it is close to the church, transportation and amenities.
(+) Stan Koloboff
- He belongs to a senior organization located on Geary Street.
- There is a need for senior housing in the area and urges the Commission to approve the project.
(+) Alexander Idome
- He is a member of the Russian/American community.
- The Discretionary Review requestor's building is on the east side of the street, so it will not give him any shadows.
- He hopes that the Commission will approve the project.
ACTION: Did not take Discretionary Review and approved the demolition.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford-Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
19b. 2003.0460D (G. CABREROS: (415) 558-6169)
469 - 26TH AVENUE - west side between Geary Boulevard and Clement Street, Lot 014 in Assessor's Block 1458 - Mandatory Discretionary Review under the Planning Commission's policy requiring review of all residential demolitions, of Demolition Permit Application No. 9714258 proposing to demolish a two-story, single-family residence in an RM-1 (Residential, Mixed, Low Density) District with a 40-X Height and Bulk District. Construction of a four-story building with 18 senior housing units and four parking spaces is also proposed on Lots 013, 014 and 015 under a separate permit.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve demolition.
SPEAKER (S): Same as those listed for item 19a.
ACTION: Did not take Discretionary Review and approved the demolition.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford-Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
19c. 2003.0459D (G. CABREROS: (415) 558-6169)
471-473 - 26TH AVENUE - west side between Geary Boulevard and Clement Street, Lot 015 in Assessor's Block 1458 - Mandatory Discretionary Review under the Planning Commission's policy requiring review of all residential demolitions, of Demolition Permit Application No. 9714257 proposing to demolish a two-story, two-family residence in an RM-1 (Residential, Mixed, Low Density) District with a 40-X Height and Bulk District. Construction of a four-story building with 18 senior housing units and four parking spaces is also proposed on Lots 013, 014 and 015 under a separate permit.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve demolition.
SPEAKER (S): Same as those listed for item 19a.
ACTION: Did not take Discretionary Review and approved the demolition.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford-Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
19d. 2003.0512D (G. CABREROS: (415) 558-6169)
463-473 26TH AVENUE - west side between Geary Boulevard and Clement Street, Lots 013, 014, 015 in Assessor's Block 1458 - Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 9714255 proposing to construct a four-story building with 18 senior housing units and four parking spaces in an RM-1 (Residential, Mixed, Low Density) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve as submitted.
SPEAKER (S): Same as those listed for item 19a.
ACTION: Did not take Discretionary Review and approved as submitted.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford-Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
20. 2003.0234D (G. CABREROS: (415) 558-6169)
156 - 12TH AVENUE - east side between California and Lake Streets, Lot 030 in Assessor's Block 1371 - Mandatory Discretionary Review under the Planning Commission's policy requiring review of all residential demolitions, of Demolition Permit Application No. 2002.10.15.9004 proposing to demolish a three-story, single-family residence in an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) District with a 40-X Height and Bulk District. Construction of a four-story, two-unit building with two parking spaces is also proposed under separate permit.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve demolition.
SPEAKER (S):
(+) Jim Ruben - Representing Project Sponsor
- Staff is correct, there is no opposition to this project.
- Neighbors are glad to see the homes come down.
- He would like to proceed with demolition.
(+) (name unclear)
- His issues relate to the fact that there are three homes on the same block that have recently been sold. He wonders if they are from the same owner.
- The subject property will be loosing light and air if there is a new adjacent construction.
ACTION: Did not take Discretionary Review and approved the demolition.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford-Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
21. 2003.0588D (G. CABREROS: (415) 558-6169)
1532-1534 COLE STREET - east side of the street and south of the intersection of Cole and Carmel Streets, Lot 016 in Assessor's Block 1293 - Mandatory Discretionary Review under the Planning Commission's policy requiring review of all residential demolitions, of Demolition Permit Application No. 2002.12.20.4027 proposing to demolish a two-story, two-unit dwelling in an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) District with a 40-X Height and Bulk District. Construction of a two-story, two-unit building with two parking spaces is also proposed under separate permit.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve demolition.
SPEAKER (S):
Re: Continuance
(+) Jeremy Paul
- He is in favor of continuing this item, and if possible, giving it full consideration of placing if at the beginning of the Discretionary Review calendar.
-
ACTION: Without hearing, item continued to July 10, 2003.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford-Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
22a. 2002.1171DV (M. WOODS: (415) 558-6315)
2312 WEBSTER STREET - east side between Washington and Jackson Streets; Lot 22 in Assessor's Block 604 - Mandatory Discretionary Review, under the Planning Commission's policy requiring review of all dwelling unit mergers, of Building Permit Application No. 2002.09.04.5572S, proposing to reconfigure the existing two-unit building to a single-family configuration with a new small auxiliary unit at the garage level in an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) District and 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Take Discretionary Review and disapprove the proposed reconfiguration of units.
(Continued from Regular Meeting of June 12, 2003)
SPEAKER (S):
(+) Lou Blazej - Representing Project Sponsor
- He displayed a photo of the current home and the proposed project.
- He also displayed maps of the interior of the proposed home.
- This project will restore a home to its original single-family configuration.
(+) Joe O'Donoghue - Residential Builders
- It is important to maintain facades as much as possible.
- Mergers are not approved yet; this home was originally a single-family home.
- Family housing will be taken away if this project is not approved.
- This project should be approved because it will allow a large family to live there.
- Policies seem to be contradictories.
- There is no inconsistency if this project is approved.
-
ACTION: Hearing held and public hearing closed. Item continued to July 17, 2003.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford-Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
22b. 2002.1171DV (M. WOODS: (415) 558-6315)
2312 WEBSTER STREET - east side between Washington and Jackson Streets; Lot 22 in Assessor's Block 604 - Rear yard and non-complying structure Variances sought: Approximately fifty percent of the rear building wall of the lower two floors of the existing three-story over garage, two-unit building is within one foot of the rear lot line and the existing rear exit stairs are less than two feet from the rear lot line, thus making the building non-complying. The proposal is (1) to expand the garage level such that the entire garage level is within one foot of the rear lot line; (2) to rebuild the rear exit stairs in the southeast corner with one-hour fire rated walls up to the third floor level; and (3) to construct new fire escape stairs in the northeast corner with one-hour fire rated walls at the fourth floor level. The subject property is within an RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) District and 40-X Height and Bulk District.
(Continued from Regular Meeting of June 12, 2003)
SPEAKER (S): Same as those listed for item 22a.
ACTION: Zoning Administrator closed the public hearing and continued this item to July 17, 2003.
23a. 2003.0346DV (D. DIBARTOLO: (415) 558-6291)
Avenue, Lot 001 in Assessor's Block 0074 - Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2001.12.20.5662S, a proposal to demolish a parking lot and to construct a new four-story, mixed-use building containing nine dwelling units, ground floor retail, and nine off-street parking spaces. The subject property is located in the North Beach Neighborhood Commercial District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve the project as revised.
SPEAKER (S):
(-) Marc Bruno - Telegraph Hill Dwellers Association
- The height of this building has been altered because of the Discretionary Review.
- The proponents of the project, with the consent of the Planning Department, determined that the project should be 1-1/2 feet less.
- He has been working on this project for almost a year.
- One of his concerns of having a wall that surrounds the building on the ground floor is that it invites crime and graffiti.
- He requests that the commercial space on the ground floor be developed.
- There should be something positive done in the neighborhood.
- He hopes that the Commission will take Discretionary Review and come to a compromise with the builders.
(-) Elizabeth Malloy
- She lives three blocks from the proposed site.
- There is a library across the street from the proposed project
- She read a letter from the librarian who is against this project because it will cast shadows.
- She read another letter from the Executive Director of the Telegraph Hill Dwellers Association who is also not in support of the project.
(-) Brad Willmore
- His concern is how this process has developed.
- He feels that the project sponsor has not been very honest with the neighbors.
- It is important that when a developer presents a project to a neighborhood, they should be open and honest.
- There seems to be a discrepancy with the height of the building.
- He urges the Commission to deny the project in its entirety.
(-) Mary Joe Ellen - Telegraph Hill Dwellers Association
- She is a resident of North Beach.
- She requests that the Commission take Discretionary Review and reduce the height and bulk of the building.
- The design of the building is not compatible with adjacent buildings.
(-) Michael Penner
- This building exceeds the height requirements.
- One of the major problems with the project is the rush to approve it, therefore not giving the opportunity for public comment.
- He urges the Commission to re-notice this project.
(-) Nan G. Roth - Telegraph Hill Dwellers Association
- This is a very tall and bulky structure.
- There should be some standards for which to measure this building.
- She urges the Commission to take Discretionary Review and allow more investigation on this project.
(-) Fritz Terplan - Telegraph Hill Dwellers Association
- He remembers when there was a gas station at this location.
- There seems to be confusion with the height. Either way, it is too large for the neighborhood.
- The library needs more space, modernization, etc.
- The library would be able to use the space at the proposed site.
(-) Jenne Milligan - Telegraph Hill Dwellers Association
- This project is too bulky, dense, and is not particularly useful for small businesses.
- There is a need to have a building that will be viewed by thousands of visitors.
- This is an eyesore because of the bulk and the height.
(-) (Did not state name)
- There are hundreds of tourists that go down Columbus Avenue.
- He would rather see a park at this location.
- This space, if this is approved, will never come back.
(-) Song Lee
- She lives in the neighborhood
- She feels that the proposed project is too large and out of character.
- North Beach is grossly underserved for public spaces for children.
- She would rather have a service that could be used by everyone in the neighborhood.
(-) (name unclear)
- He opposed the project.
- He would rather have open space or a library.
(-) Paul Scott - President of the Telegraph Hill Dwellers Association
- This project is too large for the space.
- It is important to get the architects together and come to a solution.
- The top level of the structure should be set back and there would be two penthouses.
- It would help to have more open space in the ground floor for retail.
(-) Jeffrey Graham - Telegraph Hill Dwellers Association
- They are concerned with the height and bulk.
- He is an architect.
- He displayed a diagram of an alternative structure and the interior of it.
(+) Jim Reuben - Reuben and Alter - Representing Project Sponsor
- There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances.
- The lot is on Columbus Street and this street is the widest in the area.
- The building has a lot of support.
- The Telegraph Hill Dwellers have had over a year to present him with an alternative design.
- Forty feet would require four stories and this project is only three stories.
- This building is code complying and the project sponsor should be allowed to proceed.
(+) Dave Steinberg - Project Architect
- He displayed a photograph of the proposed project.
(+) Supervisor Tony Hall
- The Board of Supervisors has received a rash of appeals, some without any support and others with the signatures of his colleagues.
- He hears the arguments on both sides.
- Comments usually discredit the reputation of the sponsors.
- This project falls within the regulations. It is a good project.
(+) Bryan O'Flynn
- He has a lot of emotional interest in this project.
- He has done extensive research. It is a relatively small site.
- There are a lot of people who support the project.
- There is exaggerated and distorted information.
(+) Keith Wilson
- He is a managing partner of a building he owns in North Beach.
- He has analyzed the plans and visited the site. He has determined that this is a good project and is compatible with the buildings in the area.
- There are a lot accusations and contradictions within the members of the Telegraph Hill Dwellers Association.
(+) David Chan
- He owns property across the street from the proposed site.
- He is a member of the North Beach Neighbors Association.
- The project sponsor has given a great presentation on this project.
- They have been quite honest with him.
- He urges the Commission to approve this project.
(+) Sal Busalacahi
- He lives within 300 feet of the proposed site.
- He has lived there for 58 years.
- He is shocked at the pictures the Discretionary Review requestors have displayed.
- He is also a member of the Telegraph Hill Dwellers Association.
- He is speaking on behalf of the North Beach Neighbors who have approved the development of this project just as it stands.
(+) James Lou
- The Board of Directors of the North Beach Neighbors have looked at this project very closely and has determined that they support this project.
(+) Kate Murphy O'Flynn
- She had an office near the project site.
- She feels that this is a big attraction for housing and aesthetic duty.
(+) Jim Byrne
- He is a native San Franciscan and owns property near the area.
- This project will allow families to live in a very good area.
- This is a wonderful opportunity for nine families to enjoy.
(+) Sven Lavime - Sven Lavime Design
- He did the renderings of the project.
- He displayed renderings of the project and explained how they took measurements and verified dimensions.
(+) Bruce Bauman
- He is in support of this project.
- This is the 19th month that this project has been in progress, so it has not been rushed through.
- This is a very complicated project.
- It is important to not look at the number of stories, but to look at the height.
(+) Joe O'Donoghue
- There will be 9 units available here on this transit corridor.
- The elevator in this project is very important for people to be able to reach the roof.
- As a transit corridor, the height of the proposed project should not be a problem.
-
ACTION: Did not take Discretionary Review and approved the project.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford-Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
23b. 2003.0346DV (D. DIBARTOLO: (415) 558-6291)
SPEAKER (S): Same as those listed for item 23a.
ACTION: Zoning Administrator closed the public hearing and granted the variance.
24. 2003.0079D (D. DIBARTOLO: (4150 558-6291)
1120-1124 CLAY STREET - north side between Taylor and Mason Streets; Lot 033 in Assessor's Block 0213 - Mandatory Discretionary Review, under the Planning Commission's policy requiring review of all dwelling unit mergers, of Building Permit Application No. 2002.11.14.1411, proposing to merge two units each on both the first and
second floors, converting the five-unit building to a three-unit building. The site is in a RM-3 (Residential, Mixed, Medium-Density) District and a 65-A Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Take Discretionary Review and disapprove the Permit Application.
SPEAKER (S):
(+) Cristine Patterson - Project Sponsor
- They purchased their home in 1996. Originally, the building was built with three units.
- There are two units on the lower floor and two units on the middle floor and one unit on the top.
- The Rent Board gave the approval in 1996 to merge the top two units into one and this has been their home ever since.
- The property has been in disrepair.
- There has been a lot of tenant turnover in the units, because the units offer livability for only one or two people. There have been many young married couples renting the units, but whey they had children they had to move because the units are so small.
- If they were able to merge the units and bring it back to a full floor unit that would accommodate a family or roommates, it would be more convenient for the tenants.
(+) Michael Parrett
- He realizes that the Commission has a policy to review all merger cases, but sometimes there are exceptions and this is one of them.
- The merger would not cause any displacement.
ACTION: Took Discretionary Review and approved the merger of the first floor units. They delayed the merger of the 2nd floor units until the tenants voluntarily move out.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford-Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
25. 2003.047D (D. SIDER: (415) 558-6697)
1415-1417 GUERRERO STREET - east side between 26th and Army (Cesar Chavez) Streets, Lot 011B in Assessor's Block 6568 - A Discretionary Review Request of Building Permit Application Number 2001.07.02.2861, a proposal to (1) raise the existing structure by approximately three feet and excavate portions of the site to accommodate a new four-car parking garage at semi-below-grade level and (2) perform interior and exterior alterations including but not limited to the construction of a new rear deck and stairs and an expansion of habitable area in the rear of the structure. The property is within an RH-3 (Residential, House, Three-Family) Zoning District and a 50-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve the project as proposed.
SPEAKER (S):
(-) Jennifer Fong - Discretionary Review Requestor
- Since she filed the Discretionary Review, the project sponsor has revised his plans, but there are still issues that need to be dealt with.
- There is a street tree that will be affected with this construction.
- The tree is the major green space on the street.
- She questioned the health of the new replacement tree.
- She wants to contest the Planning Department's review of the parking situation caused by the garage.
- She is concerned that there will be structural damage to her property when the proposed property is raised.
(+) Lisa Nakajara
- She has three areas of concerns: 1) safety and an increase in traffic congestion; 2) negative impact on street noise and beautification of the area; 3) direct impact on her building.
- There are a very large number of cars traveling at high speeds in the area.
- She would love to see the buildings cleaned up, but she is concerned about the tree that will be lost.
- She is at home during the day. She is concerned that she will not be able to continue living there because there might be construction damage, and because there is a shared wall with the proposed project.
(-) Ana Sears
- She and her husband have lived on Guerrero Street for the last 20 years.
- They have seen many serious accidents.
- The garage in their building has been impossible to use. In order to maneuver a vehicle into the garage entrance, which is 6 feet from the corner of Cesar Chavez and only 12 feet wide, the vehicle also has to be perpendicular to the flow of traffic.
- During commute hours, there are is even a larger number of cars coming around the corner, almost blindly.
(-) David Jon
- He has lived on Guerrero Street since 1968.
- He has worked with the Police Department for 23 years.
- If this project is built, there will be three parking spots taken away and this will affect the neighbors.
- The construction will cause an indentation on the sidewalk.
- There is a senior day program nearby and there are a lot of seniors that come participate. The proposed construction could have a negative effect on them.
(-) Michelle Gettos
- She has lived on Guerrero Street for many years.
- She contests the Planning Department's review on parking.
- She has a concern of the increased traffic on the street.
- She hopes that the Commission will disapprove the project.
(-) Gary Nathan
- He is concerned that the character of the neighborhood will not be maintained with the proposed project.
(-) Jorge Morashima
- There is traffic safety issue with this project.
- He feels that these issues have extraordinary and exceptional circumstances.
- The proposed project is a mirror image of the adjacent house, so it will definitely not look good for one to be higher than the other.
- The loss to the street is one of the beautiful characteristics of the street.
(+) Simon Quan - Project Architect.
- The project sponsor was not able to come to the hearing.
- He explained the architectural aspects of the project.
- It is very difficult to lift the building and provide parking, but it will add quality to the building.
- From a construction point of view the building will be reinforced and made safer.
- To accommodate this construction there will be professional construction and structural companies to do the work.
- The reason to move the tree is to be able to maneuver cars into the garage.
-
ACTION: Took Discretionary Review and disapproved the project.
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford-Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
26. 2003.0349D (M. SMITH: (415) 558-6322)
1212 DOLORES STREET - west side of the street between Clipper and 25th Streets, Lot 006 in Assessor's Block 6550 - Mandatory Discretionary Review, under Planning Commission's policy requiring review of housing demolition, of Demolition Application No. 2002.09.25.7478, proposing to demolish an existing one-story single-family dwelling (the project also proposes the construction of a new three-story over garage, three family dwelling) in a RH-3 (Residential, House, Three-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve the
Demolition.
SPEAKER (S): None
ACTION: Without hearing, continued to August 21, 2003
AYES: Antonini, Boyd, Hughes, S. Lee
ABSENT: Bradford-Bell, Feldstein, W. Lee
27. 2003.0395D (M. LI: (415) 558-6396)
1441 MONTGOMERY STREET - west side between Filbert and Greenwich Streets, Lot 001C in Assessor's Block 0086 - Request for Discretionary Review of Building Permit Application No. 2002 0927 7630, proposing the installation of a motorized chair lift within an RH-3 (Residential, House, Three-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District.
Preliminary Recommendation: Do not take Discretionary Review and approve the project as proposed